[
Jackson, Frank [1982]. “Epiphenomenal qualia”. The Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–36. DOI: 10.2307/2960077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
James, William [1890]. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, C. B. & Heil, John [1999]. “The ontological turn”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23: 34–60. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4975.00003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morch, Hedda Hassel [2017]. “The evolutionary argument for phenomenal powers”. Philosophical Perspectives 31: 293–316. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Connor, Timothy [2008]. “Agent-causal power”. In Dispositions and Causes, edited by T. Handfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 189–214.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popper, Karl & Eccles, John C. [1977]. The Self and Its Brain. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purves, Dale et. al. (ed) [2001]. Neuroscience. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, William [2007] “Evolution and epiphenomenalism”. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 14: 27–42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saad, Bradford [2019]. “A teleological strategy for solving the meta-problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 26: 205–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wasserman, Gerhard D. [1979]. “Reply to Popper’s attack on epiphenomenalism”. Mind 88: 572–5. DOI: 10.1093/mind/lxxxviii.1.572
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, John [2015]. “On James’s argument for epiphenomenalism”. William James Studies 11: 69–85. DOI: 10.26181/6100b7c9312fc
]Search in Google Scholar