[
Baxley, Anne M. 2003. “The beautiful soul and the autocratic agent: Schiller’s and Kant’s ‘children of the house’”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41: 493–514.10.1353/hph.2003.0048
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baxley, Anne M. 2008. “Pleasure, freedom and grace: Schiller’s “completion” of Kant’s ethics”. Inquiry 51: 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baxley, Anne M. 2010. “The aesthetics of morality: Schiller’s critique of Kantian rationalism”. Philosophy Compass 5: 1084–95.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00350.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Schiller as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019928282X.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beiser, Frederick. 2008. “Schiller as philosopher: a reply to my critics”. Inquiry 51: 63–78.10.1080/00201740701858977
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deligiorgi, Katarina. 2006. “Grace as guide to morals? Schiller’s aesthetic turn in ethics”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 23: 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dorsch, Fabian. 2017. “Aesthetic reasons and aesthetic obligations”. Estetika LIV/X(1): 3–19.10.33134/eeja.153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eaton, Marcia Muelder. 2001. Merit, Aesthetic and Ethical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1794/95. “Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre / Foundations of the entire science of knowledge”. In Fichte, Science of Knowledge (Wissenschaftslehre). Translated by Peter Heath. Peter Heath and John Lachs (eds.). New York: Century-Crofts, 1970.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gauthier, Jeffrey. 1997. “Schiller’s critique of Kant’s moral psychology: reconciling practical reason and an ethics of virtue”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27: 513–43.10.1080/00455091.1997.10717484
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guyer, Paul. 2006. “The ideal of beauty and the necessity of grace: Kant and Schiller on ethics and aesthetics”. In Friedrich Schiller und der Weg in die Moderne, Walter Hinderer (ed.). Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann: 187–204.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamburger, Käte. 1956. “Schillers Fragment “Der Menschenfeind” und die Idee der Kalokagathie”. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 30: 367–400.10.1007/BF03374905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henrich, Dieter. 1957. “Der Begriff der Schönheit in Schiller’sÄsthetik”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 11: 527–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henrich, Dieter. 1982. “Beauty and freedom: Schiller’s struggle with Kant’s aesthetics”. In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 237–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Houlgate, Stephen. 2008. “Schiller and the dance of beauty”. Inquiry 51: 37–49.10.1080/00201740701858936
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. “Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals”. In Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 1790. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer, P. and Eric Matthews, Paul Guyer (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 1793. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Edited and translated by Allen Wood and George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubala, Robbie. 2018. “Grounding aesthetic obligations”. British Journal of Aesthetics 58(3): 721–85.10.1093/aesthj/ayy015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2018. Being for beauty: aesthetic agency and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198827214.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matherne, Samantha and Riggle, Nick. 2020. “Schiller on freedom and aesthetic value: Part I”. British Journal of Aesthetics 60(4): 375–402.10.1093/aesthj/ayaa006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matherne, Samantha and Riggle, Nick. 2021. “Schiller on freedom and aesthetic value: Part II”. British Journal of Aesthetics 61(1): 17–40.10.1093/aesthj/ayaa005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGonigal, Andrew. 2018. “Aesthetic reasons”. In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Daniel Star (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 908–35.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.40
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray, Patrick. 1994. The Development of German Aesthetic Theory from Kant to Schiller: Philosophical Commentary on Schiller’s “Aesthetic Education of Man”. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plato, Levno von. 2017. “Kant’s ideal of beauty as the symbol of the morally good and as a source of aesthetic normativity”. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 9: 412–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plato, Levno von. 2018. The Aesthetic Expression of Moral Character: Moral Beauty in the Eighteenth Century. Münster: Mentis.10.30965/9783957438324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plato, Levno von. 2020. “Rechtsprinzipien und ästhetische Normenbegründung”. In Rechtsästhetik in rechtsphilosophischer Absicht. Untersuchungen zu Formen und Wahrnehmungen des Rechts. Eva Schürmann and Levno von Plato (eds.). Baden-Baden: Nomos: 119–47.10.5771/9783748908784-119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roehr, Sabine. 2003. “Freedom and autonomy in Schiller”. Journal of the History of Ideas 64(1): 119–34.10.1353/jhi.2003.0016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, Friedrich. (NA). Schillers Werke: Nationalausgabe (NA). Petersen, Julius et al. (eds.), 43 vols. Weimar: Verlag Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1943ff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, Friedrich. 1793a. “Kallias or concerning beauty: letters to Gottfried Körner”. In Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Translated by Stefan Bird-Pollan. Jay Bernstein (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 145–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, Friedrich. 1793b. “On grace and dignity”. In Schiller’s “On Grace and Dignity” in its Cultural Context. Edited and translated by Jane Curran and Christophe Fricker. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2005:. 123–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schiller, Friedrich. 1794. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters. Edited and translated by Elisabeth Wilkinson and Leonard Willoughby. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmalzried, Lisa Katharin. 2017. “‘All grace is beautiful but not all beauty is grace’. A critical look at Schiller’s view on human beauty”. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 9: 533–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simoniti, Vid. 2021. “Art as political discourse”. British Journal of Aesthetics 61(4): 559–74.10.1093/aesthj/ayab018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiese, Benno von. 1959. Friedrich Schiller. Stuttgart: Metzlersche Verlagsbuchandlung.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilcox, Kenneth. 1981. Anmut und Würde: Die Dialektik der menschlichen Vollendung bei Schiller. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
