[Bonardi, Paolo. 2018. A farewell to the creatures of darkness. Manuscript.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonardi, Paolo. 2019. Manifest validity and beyond: an inquiry into the nature of coordination and the identity of guises and propositional-attitude states. Linguistics and Philosophy 42(5): 475–515.10.1007/s10988-018-9245-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonardi, Paolo. 2020. Rational belief and dialetheism. Manuscript.10.1515/ip-2021-2016]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonardi, Paolo. Forthcoming. Coordination, understanding, and semantic requirements. In Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine, ed. by M. Dumitru. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, David. 1998. Understanding belief reports. Philosophical Review 107(4): 555–95.10.2307/2998375]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, David. 2002. Cognitive significance, attitude ascriptions, and ways of believing propositions. Philosophical Studies 108(1): 65–81.10.1023/A:1015760114297]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, David. 2006. Illogical, but rational. Noûs 40(2): 376–9.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00616.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, David and Saul, Jennifer. 2002. Simple sentences, substitutions, and mistaken evaluations. Philosophical Studies 111(1): 1–41.10.1023/A:1021287328280]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, John. 1987. Is sense transparent? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88: 273–92.10.1093/aristotelian/88.1.273]Search in Google Scholar
[Cumming, Sam. 2013. Creatures of darkness. Analytic Philosophy 54(4): 379–400.10.1111/phib.12028]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 2007. Semantic Relationism. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470690826]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 2010. Comments on Scott Soames’ “Coordination Problems”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81(2): 475–84.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00405.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 2014. Recurrence: a rejoinder. Philosophical Studies 169(3): 425–8.10.1007/s11098-013-0189-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. Forthcoming. Comments on Paolo Bonardi’s “Coordination, understanding, and semantic requirements”. In Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine, ed. by M. Dumitru. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. Translated as “On Sense and Reference” in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by P. Geach and M. Black. London: Blackwell, 1952.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodsell, Thea. 2014. Is de jure coreference non-transitive? Philosophical Studies 167(2): 291–312.10.1007/s11098-012-0051-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, Keith. 2013. Acquaintance and mental files. Disputatio 5(36): 119–32.10.2478/disp-2013-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 1968. Quantifying in. Synthese 19(1/2): 178–214.10.1007/BF00568057]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, ed. by J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 1989a. Afterthoughts. In Themes from Kaplan, ed. by J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein, 565–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 1990. Words. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64(1): 93–119.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/64.1.93]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 2011. An idea of Donnellan. In Having in Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnellan, ed. by J. Almog and P. Leonardi, 122–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199844845.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, Saul A. 1979. A puzzle about belief. In Meaning and Use, ed. by A. Margalit, 239–83. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-1-4020-4104-4_20]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murez, Michael. 2011. Mental files and the dynamics of identity. Manuscript.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pagin, Peter. 2013. The cognitive significance of mental files. Disputatio 5(36): 133–45.10.2478/disp-2013-0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Papineau, David. 2006. Phenomenal and perceptual concepts. In Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, ed. by T. Alter and S. Walter, 111–44. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195171655.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinillos, Angel. 2011. Coreference and meaning. Philosophical Studies 154(2): 301–24.10.1007/s11098-010-9543-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Priest, Graham. 2016. Towards Non-Being. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783596.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Pryor, Jim. 2016. Mental graphs. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7(2): 309–41.10.1007/s13164-015-0280-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Quiroga, Rodrigo Quian. 2012. Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(8): 587–97.10.1038/nrn3251]Search in Google Scholar
[Quiroga, Rodrigo Quian, Leila Reddy, Gabriel Kreiman, Christof Koch and Itzhak Fried. 2005. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435(7045): 1102–7.10.1038/nature03687]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. 2012. Mental Files. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659982.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. 2013. Mental files: replies to my critics. Disputatio 5(36): 207–42.10.2478/disp-2013-0018]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. 2016. Mental Files in Flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790358.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. Forthcoming. Mental files. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, ed. by P. Stalmaszczyk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sainsbury, Mark and Michael Tye. 2012. Seven Puzzles of Thought and How to Solve Them: An Originalist Theory of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695317.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sainsbury, Mark; Michael Tye and Ruth G. Millikan. 2011. Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 85: 101–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 1989. Illogical belief. Philosophical Perspectives 3: 243–85.10.2307/2214270]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 1993. Analiticity and apriority. Philosophical Perspectives 7: 125–33.10.2307/2214118]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 1993a. Relative and absolute apriority. Philosophical Studies 69(1): 83–100.10.1007/BF00989625]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 1998. Nonexistence. Philosophical Perspectives 1: 49–108.10.2307/2214143]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 2006. The Resilience of illogical belief. Noûs 40(2): 369–75.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00615.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Salmon, Nathan. 2012. Recurrence. Philosophical Studies 159(3): 407–41.10.1007/s11098-011-9773-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Saul, Jennifer. 2007. Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219155.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiffer, Stephen. 1990. The mode-of-presentation problem. In Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind, ed. by C.A. Anderson and J. Owens, 249–68. Stanford: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soames, Scott. 1987. Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content. Philosophical Topics 15(1): 47–87.10.5840/philtopics198715112]Search in Google Scholar
[Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195145283.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Soames, Scott. 2014. Two versions of Millianism. In Analytic Philosophy in America: and Other Historical and Contemporary Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691160726.003.0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Soames, Scott. 2015. Rethinking Language, Mind, and Meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400866335]Search in Google Scholar