Indispensability Arguments and Their Quinean Heritage

Baker, Alan. 2005. Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena? Mind 114: 223-238.10.1093/mind/fzi223Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Alan. 2009. Mathematical Explanation in Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60: 611-633.10.1093/bjps/axp025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chihara S. Charles. 2004. A Structural Account of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 2001. The Indispensability of Mathematics. Oxford-New-York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019513754X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 2006. Scientific Realism and Mathematical Nominalism: A marriage made in Hell. In Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave, edited by C. Cheyne & J. Worrall, Dordrecht: Kluwer, Australasian Studies Series. 225-237.10.1007/1-4020-4207-8_12Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 2007. Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge. In Mathematical Knowledge, edited by M. Leng, A. Paseau & M. Potter, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 109–122.Search in Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark & Lyon, Aidan. 2008. The Explanatory Power of Phase Spaces. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 16: 227–243.10.1093/philmat/nkm025Search in Google Scholar

Dieveney, Parick. 2007. Dispensability in the indispensability argument. Synthese, 157: 105-128.10.1007/s11229-006-9035-ySearch in Google Scholar

Field, Hartry. 1980. Science without Numbers. Oxford. Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Field, Hartry. 1982. Realism and Anti-Realism about Mathematics. Philosophical Topics. 13: 45-69; also in Field (1989): 53-78.10.5840/philtopics19821313Search in Google Scholar

Field, Hartry. 1989. Introduction. In H. Field, Realism, Mathematics and Modality, Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Folina, Janet. 1999. Review, Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 40: 455-472.10.1305/ndjfl/1022615622Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, Alvin & Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1947. Steps Towards a Constructive Empiricism. The Journal of Simbolic Logic 12: 105-122.10.2307/2266485Search in Google Scholar

Leng, Mary. 2002. What’s Wrong With Indispensability? (Or, The Case for Recreational Mathematics). Synthese 131: 395–417.10.1023/A:1016141509719Search in Google Scholar

Liggins, David. 2008. Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine-Putnam’ indispensability argument. Erkenntnis 68: 113–127.10.1007/s10670-007-9081-ySearch in Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope. 1992. Indispensability and practice. Journal of Philosophy 89: 275-289.10.2307/2026712Search in Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo. 2008. Quine and Tarski on Nominalism. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics IV: 22–55.10.3917/oj.bouve.2008.01.0055Search in Google Scholar

Panza, Marco & Sereni, Andrea. Forthcoming. Plato’s Problem. An introduction to Mathematical Platonism. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Panza, Marco & Sereni, Andrea. Unpublished. The Indispensable Premises of the Indispensability Argument. Draft available online at: http://unisr.academia.edu/AndreaSereni/Papers/494906/Panza_M._Sereni_A._On_the_Indispensable_Premises_of_the_Indispensability_Argument,Search in Google Scholar

Parsons Charles. 1978. Quine on the Philosophy of Mathematics. In C. Parsons, Mathematics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983, also in The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, edited by Hahn L. Schilpp P., La Salle (Ill): Open Court, 1986: 369-395.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1971. Philosophy of logic. New York: Harper & Row. reprinted in H. Putnam, Mathematics, Matter and Method, Philosophical Papers vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975 (2^nd ed. 1985), ch. 20.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1998. The Greatest Logical Positivist. London Review of Books 10.8: 11-13, reprinted in H. Putnam. Realism with a Human Face, ed. James Conant, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. Forthcoming. Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In H. Putnam, Philosophy in an Age of Science, edited by M. De Caro & D. Macarthur, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1939. Designation and Existence. The Journal of Philosophy 36: 701-709, also in Readings in Philosophical Analysis, edited by H. Feigl & W. Sellars, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.10.2307/2017667Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1948. On What There Is, Review of Metaphysics 2: 21-38, also in W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, New York: Harper & Row, 1953 (2^nd edition1961), ch. 1.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1953. On Mental Entities. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 80, Contributions to the Analysis and Synthesis of Knowledge 3, 1953: 198-20310.2307/20023652Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1957. Scope and Language of Science. The British Journal for the philosophy of Science 8: 1-1710.1093/bjps/VIII.29.1Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1966. Posits and Reality. In S. Uyeda (ed.), Basis of Contemporary Philosophy, Waseda University Press, Tokyo 1960, reprinted in W.V.O Quine, The Ways of Paradox and other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966 (2^nd edition1976).Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1969. Existence and Quantification. in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 91-113.10.7312/quin92204-005Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1981. Carnap and Logical Truth. In The Ways of Paradox. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1986. Reply to Charles Parsons. In The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, edited by L. Hahn & P. Schlipp, La Salle (Ill): Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1995. From Stimulus To Science. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Resnik, Michael D. 1995. Scientific Vs Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 3: 166-174.10.1093/philmat/3.2.166Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar