Evaluation of Enriched Learning Environment in the Context of Mathematical Reasoning from the Perspective of the Students and their Teacher

Algani, Y. M., & Eshan, J. (2019). Reasons and suggested solutions for low-level academic achievement in mathematics. International e-Journal of Educational Studies (IEJES), 3(6), 181–190. doi: 10.31458/iejes.60488410.31458/iejes.604884Search in Google Scholar

Çetin, Y., & Mirasyedioglu, Ş. (2019). Teknoloji destekli probleme dayalı öğretim uygula-malarının matematik başarısına etkisi [The effects of the technology supported problem-based learning activities on students’ achievement in mathematics]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 13–34. doi: 10.18009/jcer.49490710.18009/jcer.494907Search in Google Scholar

Dovis, S., Van der Oord, S., Wiers, R. W., & Prins, P. J. (2013). What part of working memory is not working in ADHD? Short-term memory, the central executive and effects of reinforcement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(6), 901–917.10.1007/s10802-013-9729-9Search in Google Scholar

Erdem, E., Fırat, T., & Gürbüz, R. (2019). Improving mathematical reasoning and mathematics attitude of disadvantaged children in rural regions. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(14), 673–697. doi: 10.18009/jcer.62874210.18009/jcer.628742Search in Google Scholar

Erdem, E. (2015). Zenginleştirilmiş öğrenme ortamının matematiksel muhakeme ve tutuma etkisi [The effect of enriched learning environment on mathematical reasoning and attitude]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.Search in Google Scholar

Erdem, E., Gürbüz, R., & Duran, H. (2011). An investigation of mathematics used in daily life from past to present: Theory out practice in. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 232–246.Search in Google Scholar

Ertem-Akbaş, E. (2019). Eğitim bilişim ağı (EBA) destekli matematik öğretiminin 5. sınıf kesir konusunda öğrenci başarılarına etkisi [The impact of EIN (educational informatics network) assisted mathematics teaching in 5^th grade fractions on students’ achievements]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 120–145. doi: 10.18009/53195310.18009/jcer.531953Search in Google Scholar

Gencel, İ. E. (2007). Kolb’ün deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı öğrenme stilleri envanteri–III’ü Türkçeye uyarlama çalışmasi [Inventory of learning styles based on the experiential learning theory of Kolb – a study of adapting III to Turkish]. Dokuz Eylul University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(2), 120–139.Search in Google Scholar

Gök, M. (2020). Sınıf öğretmeni adayları.nın bir mobil oyun deneyimi: aritmetiğin temel teoremi [A mobile game experience of pre-service elementary teachers: The fundamental theorem of arithmetic]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(15), 41–74. doi: 10.18009/jcer.64373210.18009/jcer.643732Search in Google Scholar

Heasly, B., Lindner, J., Iliško, Dz., & Salīte, I. (2020). From initiatives, to insights, to implementation of the sustainability and securitability Agenda for 2030. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 1–4.10.2478/dcse-2020-0001Search in Google Scholar

Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87.10.1080/0305569032000159750Search in Google Scholar

Kasmer, L., & Kim, O. K. (2011). Using prediction to promote mathematical understanding and reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 111(1), 20–33.10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00056.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-Version 3.1: 2005 technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.Search in Google Scholar

Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning style inventory-version 3.1. Boston: Hay Group.Search in Google Scholar

Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2–3), 77–82.10.1080/09523980110041458Search in Google Scholar

Kramarski, B., & Zoldan, S. (2008). Using errors as springboards for enhancing mathematical reasoning with three metacognitive approaches. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 137–151.10.3200/JOER.102.2.137-151Search in Google Scholar

Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Lieberman A. (2001). Effects of multilevel versus unilevel metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 292–300.10.1080/00220670109598765Search in Google Scholar

Kükey, E., Aslaner, R., & Tutak, T. (2019). Matematiksel düşünmenin varsayımda bulunma bileşeni kapsamında ortaokul öğrencilerinin kullandıkları problem çözme stratejilerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the problem solving strategies used of middle school students for of the assumption component of mathematical thinking]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 146–170.10.18009/jcer.535610Search in Google Scholar

Merriam, S. M. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Fransisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2^nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2015). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary school mathematics lesson (grades 5–8) curriculum]. Ankara: TTKB.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018a). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum (primary and secondary school grades 1–8)]. Ankara: TTKB.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018b). 2018 Liselere geçiş sistemi (LGS): Merkezi sınavla yerleşen öğrencilerin performansı. Eğitim analiz değerlendirme raporları serisi [2018 high school transition system (LGS): Performance of students settled by central exam. Education analysis evaluation reports series]. Ankara.Search in Google Scholar

Naksutthi, K., & Chidmongkol, S. (2017). Effect of organizing mathematics learning activities using proof mapping technique to write geometric proofs on geometric reasoning ability of eighth grade students. An Online Journal of Education, 12(2), 18–31.Search in Google Scholar

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: Virginia.Search in Google Scholar

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9781139173469Search in Google Scholar

Ok, G. (2020). The impact of the contents of educational informatics network on classroom participation of students in teaching the subject of the musculoskeletal system. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(15), 224–240. doi: 10.18009/jcer.68436210.18009/jcer.684362Search in Google Scholar

Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2014). The effects of learning activities corresponding with students’ learning styles on academic success and attitude within the scope of constructivist learning approach: The case of the concepts of function and derivative. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1–38. doi: 10.16949/turcomat.3529910.16949/turcomat.35299Search in Google Scholar

Pape, S. J., Bell. C. V., & Yetkin, I. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 179–202.10.1023/A:1026062121857Search in Google Scholar

Pijls, M., Dekker, R., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). Reconstruction of a collaborative mathematical learning process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 309–329. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9051-310.1007/s10649-006-9051-3Search in Google Scholar

Polaki, M. V. (2002). Using instruction to identify key features of Basotho elementary students’ growth in probabilistic thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(4), 285–313.10.1207/S15327833MTL0404_01Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., Meihami, H., Ivanova, I., Iliško, Dz., & Gholami, J. (2020). JTES approaches to sustainability: Current practices and new perspectives for a more sustainable world. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(2), 1–4.10.2478/jtes-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar

Topuz, F., & Birgin, O. (2020). Yedinci sınıf “çember ve daire” konusunda geliştirilen geogebra destekli öğretim materyaline ve öğrenme ortamına ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri [Students’ views about geogebra-supported teaching material and learning environment developed for “circle and disc” subject at the 7^th grade]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(15), 1–27. doi: 10.18009/jcer.63814210.18009/jcer.638142Search in Google Scholar

Tum, A., & Kutluca, T. (2019). Matematiksel muhakeme bağlamında tam sayılar ve kesirler konularına yönelik zenginleştirilmiş öğrenme etkinlikleri [Enriched learning activities for integers and fractions in the context of mathematical reasoning]. In Proceedings Book 8^th Eurasian Conference on Language and Social Sciences (p. 47–70), October 18–20, Antalya, Turkey. doi: 10.35578/eclss.52775Search in Google Scholar

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri (10. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.Search in Google Scholar