[
Aláč, P., 2005. Viackriteriálne rozhodovanie v logistickom reťazci drevárskeho podniku. PhD thesis. TU vo Zvolene, Drevárska fakulta, 137 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balmat, J., Lafont, F., Maifret, R., Pessel, N., 2011. A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment. Ocean Engineering, 38(1), 171-176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canbolat, Y., Chelst, K., Garg, N., 2007. Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country for a global manufacturing facility. Omega, 35(3), 312-325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y., Okudan, G., Riley, D., 2010. Decision support for construction method selection in concrete buildings: Prefabrication adoption and optimization. Automation in Construction, 19(6), 665-675.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishburn, P., 1967. Conjoint measurement in utility theory with incomplete product sets. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4(1), 104-119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, T. J., Silvestro, R., Voss, C., 1991. Performance measurement in service businesses. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London, UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flint, D., J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., Mentzer, J.T., 2005. Logistic Innovation: A customer value-oriented social process. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 113–147, DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00196.x, ISSN 0735-3766.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, B.J., Mentzer, J.T., Cook, R.L., 2005. Supply Chain Management: The Pursuit of a Consensus Definition. Journal of Business Logistics, 26, 17–25, DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00203.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomez-Limon, J., Arriaza, M., Riesgo, L., 2003. An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(3), 569-585.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeetendra, V. A., Krishnaiah Chetty, O. V., Prashanth Reddy, J., 2000. Petri nets for project management and resource levelling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 16(7), 516-520.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahneman, D., 2012. Myšlení rychlé a pomalé. Jan Melvil publishing Brno, s.r.o., ISBN 978-80-87270-42-4, 542 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kanji, G.K., 2002. Performance measurement system. Total Quality Management, 13(5), 715–728.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, R., S., Norton, D.P, 1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keegan, D.P., Eiler, R.G., Jones, C.R., 1989. Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting, 70(12), 45–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keeney, R., 1977. The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 267-310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennerley, M., Neely, A. D., 2000. Performance measurement framework -A review. In Performance measurement-Past, present and future. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on performance measurement. Cambridge, UK, 19–21 July.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khadam, I., Kaluarachchi, J., 2003. Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(6), 683-721.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konidari, P., Mavrakis, D., 2007. A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6235-6257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakehal, A., Tachi, F., 2018. Probabilistic Assessment of Road Risks for Improving Logistics Processes. MATEC Web of Conferences 183, 01003, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201818301003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langevin, A., Riopel, D., 2005. Logistics Systems – Design and Optimization. Springer, ISBN 0-387-24971-0, 387.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, R., Kumara A., Van der Aalst, W., 2007. A formal modelling approach for supply chain event management. Decision Support Systems 43, 761-778.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loken, E., 2007. Use of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7), 1584-1595.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacBryde, J., Radnor, Z., Shepherd, C., Günter, H., 2006. Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3/4), 242-258, ISSN: 1741-0401.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neely, A., 2002. Business performance measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Song, C., Hong, Z., 2008. Time scorecard: an integrative performance measurement framework for time-based companies. In 4th International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (pp. 1–5). Dalian, China, 12–14, October.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zadeh, L., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, X., Lu, Q., Wu, T., 2011. Petri-net based applications for supply chain management: an overview. International. Journal of Production Research, 49(13), 3939-3961.
]Search in Google Scholar
