A Statistical Approach for Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Smoke Exposure in In Vivo Experiments: A Case Study of an OECD 90-Day Inhalation Study Including 3R4F and 1R6F Reference Cigarettes
, , , , , and
Jan 30, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Jan 30, 2025
Page range: 26 - 33
Received: Jul 05, 2024
Accepted: Nov 08, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2025-0003
Keywords
© 2024 Athanasios Kondylis et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Lower and upper alternative equivalence range limits (δL* and δU*, respectively) for varying statistical design parameters: constant k and coefficient of variation (cv) with corresponding standard deviation (σR)_
cv | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.2 | 0.198 | 0.820 | 1.219 |
1 | 0.3 | 0.294 | 0.746 | 1.341 |
1 | 0.4 | 0.385 | 0.680 | 1.470 |
1 | 0.5 | 0.472 | 0.624 | 1.604 |
0.76 | 0.2 | 0.198 | 0.860 | 1.162 |
0.76 | 0.3 | 0.294 | 0.800 | 1.250 |
0.76 | 0.4 | 0.385 | 0.746 | 1.340 |
0.76 | 0.5 | 0.472 | 0.698 | 1.432 |
Lower and upper equivalence range limits (δL and δU, respectively) for varying statistical design parameters: sample size by group (n), consumer’s risk (α), producer’s risk (β), and coefficient of variation (cv) with corresponding standard deviation (σR)_
cv | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.198 | 0.786 | 1.271 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.294 | 0.700 | 1.428 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.385 | 0.627 | 1.596 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.472 | 0.564 | 1.773 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.198 | 0.805 | 1.243 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.294 | 0.725 | 1.380 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.385 | 0.655 | 1.526 |
10 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.472 | 0.596 | 1.679 |