[
Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and Creativity: effects of Motivational orientation on Creative Writers. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, J. (2015). The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BarOn, R., & Parker, J.D.A. (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application At Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baruch, O.K. (2017). Big Five Personnality and Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Motivational Goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., & Moreau, P. (2021). Towards the design of a quick and universal questionnaire to assess the intuitiveness of products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22, 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1876177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., Moreau, P., & Boumenir, Y. (2020). Designing universal visuotactile pictograms for orientation maps. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10, 31–69. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v10i1.219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buisine, S., Boisadan, A., Richir, S. (2018). L’innovation radicale par la méthode de l’utilisateur extraordinaire. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 24, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buisine, S., Taton, A., & Boisadan, A. (2021). Need-seeking: Creating, discovering or recovering needs? In N.L.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Black et al. (Eds), Proceedings of IEA 2021 Triennal Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, LNNS 219, p. 624–630.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen, C. (1997 first edition – 2016 last edition). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, R., & DeYoung, C. (2014). Creativity and the aspects of neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, D.A, & Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eisenberg, I. (2011). Lead user Research for Breakthrough Innovation. Research-Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2011.11657673
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faullant, R., Schwarz, E.J., Krajger, I., & Breitenecker, R.J. (2012). Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Lead Userness: The Search for Individual Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00626.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead-User Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fürst, G., Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2023). Créativité et personnalité. In N. Bonnardel, F. Girandola, E. Bonetto & T. Lubart (Eds.), La créativité en situations (pp. 86–100). Dunod.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the big five paradigm. In G.J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 140–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geher, G., Bettancourt, K., & Jewell, O. (2017). The Link between Emotional Intelligence and Creativity? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617710029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ioannidou, F., & Konstantikaki, V. (2008). Empathy and emotional intelligence: What it is really about? International Journal of Caring Sciences, 1(3), 118–123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M.A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0039826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaruzelski, B., Staack, V., et Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Strategy Business, 77, 2–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, J.A. (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond bid and little: the four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koning, C.C. (2016). Identifying lead users through a personality characteristics survey. (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kratzer, J., Lettl, C., Franke, N., et Gloor, P.A. (2016). The Social Network Position of Lead Users. Journal of product innovation management, 33(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12291
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreuzig, H.W. (1981). Über den Zugang zu komplexen Problemlösen mittels prozeßorientierter kognitiver Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 294–308.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehnen, J., & Herstatt, C. (2016). Thirty years lead user research – an empirical study of its implementation level in business practice. https://oui2016.exordo.com/files/papers/130/initial_draft/Thirty_years_lead_user_research_Lehnen_Herstatt.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilien, G., Morrison, P.D., Saerls, K., Sonnack, M., et von Hippel, E. (2001). Performance Assessment of the Lead User idea Generation Process for New Product Development. ISBM Report 4-2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Armand Colin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité, 2nd ed. Armand Colin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lüthje, C. (2000). Kundenorientierung im Innovationsprozess. Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, A., Agnoletti, M.F., & Brangier, E. (2021). Ordinary users, precursory users and experts in the anticipation of future needs: Evaluation of their contribution in the elaboration of new needs in energy for housing. Applied Ergonomics, 94(3), 103394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2004). The Nature of Lead Users and Measurement of Leading Edge Status. Research Policy, 33, 351–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pajo, S., Verhaegen, P-A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J.R. (2015). Fast Lead User Identification Framework. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puryear, J.S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A.N. (2017). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. Journal of Creative Behavior.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E.M (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination. Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schreier, M., & Prügl, R.J. (2008) Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 331–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007. Lead Users and the Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Insights from Two Extreme Sports Communities. Marketing Letters, 18, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11002-006-9009-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L.E., Haggerty, D.J., Cooper, J.T., Golden, C.J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schweizer, T.S. (2006). The Psychology of Novelty-Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work-Psychological Perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M., & et Skiera, B. (2012). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00881.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Higgs, C. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: Opening up a black box. In M. D. Mumford, & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Hanbook of research and leadership (pp. 100–130). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Story, M., Mueller, J., & Mace, M. (1998). Designing for People of all Ages and Abilities. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Hippel, E.,Thomke,S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.
]Search in Google Scholar