Cite

Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and Creativity: effects of Motivational orientation on Creative Writers. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393 Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (2015). The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480 Search in Google Scholar

BarOn, R., & Parker, J.D.A. (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application At Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Company. Search in Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073 Search in Google Scholar

Baruch, O.K. (2017). Big Five Personnality and Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Motivational Goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.183 Search in Google Scholar

Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., & Moreau, P. (2021). Towards the design of a quick and universal questionnaire to assess the intuitiveness of products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22, 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1876177 Search in Google Scholar

Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., Moreau, P., & Boumenir, Y. (2020). Designing universal visuotactile pictograms for orientation maps. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10, 31–69. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v10i1.219 Search in Google Scholar

Buisine, S., Boisadan, A., Richir, S. (2018). L’innovation radicale par la méthode de l’utilisateur extraordinaire. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 24, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

Buisine, S., Taton, A., & Boisadan, A. (2021). Need-seeking: Creating, discovering or recovering needs? In N.L. Search in Google Scholar

Black et al. (Eds), Proceedings of IEA 2021 Triennal Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, LNNS 219, p. 624–630. Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C. (1997 first edition – 2016 last edition). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press. Search in Google Scholar

Clark, R., & DeYoung, C. (2014). Creativity and the aspects of neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.224 Search in Google Scholar

Conner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022 Search in Google Scholar

Cook, D.A, & Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 Search in Google Scholar

Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, I. (2011). Lead user Research for Breakthrough Innovation. Research-Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2011.11657673 Search in Google Scholar

Faullant, R., Schwarz, E.J., Krajger, I., & Breitenecker, R.J. (2012). Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Lead Userness: The Search for Individual Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00626.x Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 Search in Google Scholar

Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead-User Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x Search in Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2023). Créativité et personnalité. In N. Bonnardel, F. Girandola, E. Bonetto & T. Lubart (Eds.), La créativité en situations (pp. 86–100). Dunod. Search in Google Scholar

Fürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the big five paradigm. In G.J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 140–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.009 Search in Google Scholar

Geher, G., Bettancourt, K., & Jewell, O. (2017). The Link between Emotional Intelligence and Creativity? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617710029 Search in Google Scholar

George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513 Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 Search in Google Scholar

Ioannidou, F., & Konstantikaki, V. (2008). Empathy and emotional intelligence: What it is really about? International Journal of Caring Sciences, 1(3), 118–123. Search in Google Scholar

Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M.A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0039826 Search in Google Scholar

Jaruzelski, B., Staack, V., et Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Strategy Business, 77, 2–16. Search in Google Scholar

John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, J.A. (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond bid and little: the four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688 Search in Google Scholar

Koning, C.C. (2016). Identifying lead users through a personality characteristics survey. (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente). Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, J., Lettl, C., Franke, N., et Gloor, P.A. (2016). The Social Network Position of Lead Users. Journal of product innovation management, 33(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12291 Search in Google Scholar

Kreuzig, H.W. (1981). Über den Zugang zu komplexen Problemlösen mittels prozeßorientierter kognitiver Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 294–308. Search in Google Scholar

Lehnen, J., & Herstatt, C. (2016). Thirty years lead user research – an empirical study of its implementation level in business practice. https://oui2016.exordo.com/files/papers/130/initial_draft/Thirty_years_lead_user_research_Lehnen_Herstatt.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Lilien, G., Morrison, P.D., Saerls, K., Sonnack, M., et von Hippel, E. (2001). Performance Assessment of the Lead User idea Generation Process for New Product Development. ISBM Report 4-2001. Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Armand Colin. Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité, 2nd ed. Armand Colin. Search in Google Scholar

Lüthje, C. (2000). Kundenorientierung im Innovationsprozess. Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden. Search in Google Scholar

Martin, A., Agnoletti, M.F., & Brangier, E. (2021). Ordinary users, precursory users and experts in the anticipation of future needs: Evaluation of their contribution in the elaboration of new needs in energy for housing. Applied Ergonomics, 94(3), 103394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103394 Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2004). The Nature of Lead Users and Measurement of Leading Edge Status. Research Policy, 33, 351–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007 Search in Google Scholar

Pajo, S., Verhaegen, P-A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J.R. (2015). Fast Lead User Identification Framework. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.434 Search in Google Scholar

Puryear, J.S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A.N. (2017). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. Journal of Creative Behavior. Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Search in Google Scholar

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination. Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG Search in Google Scholar

Schreier, M., & Prügl, R.J. (2008) Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 331–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x Search in Google Scholar

Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007. Lead Users and the Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Insights from Two Extreme Sports Communities. Marketing Letters, 18, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11002-006-9009-3 Search in Google Scholar

Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L.E., Haggerty, D.J., Cooper, J.T., Golden, C.J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177. Search in Google Scholar

Schweizer, T.S. (2006). The Psychology of Novelty-Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work-Psychological Perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172. Search in Google Scholar

Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M., & et Skiera, B. (2012). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00881.x Search in Google Scholar

Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Higgs, C. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: Opening up a black box. In M. D. Mumford, & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Hanbook of research and leadership (pp. 100–130). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715465 Search in Google Scholar

Story, M., Mueller, J., & Mace, M. (1998). Designing for People of all Ages and Abilities. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design. Search in Google Scholar

von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

von Hippel, E.,Thomke,S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2354-0036
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Arts, general, Social Sciences, Psychology, Development Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education, other