1. bookVolume 8 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

How do You Feel in Virtual Environments? The Role of Emotions and Openness Trait Over Creative Performance

Published Online: 30 Aug 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 8 (2021) - Issue 1 (June 2021)
Page range: 148 - 164
Received: 31 May 2021
Accepted: 02 Jul 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the Dynamic Creativity Framework creativity is defined as a context-embedded phenomenon requiring potential originality and effectiveness. This definition indicates that the environmental conditions embedding the creative process have fundamental impact on the process itself and its outcomes. In particular, Virtual environments (VEs) are emerging as everyday contexts for a large part of the world population, affecting behaviors and feelings. VEs have been demonstrated to affect creative performance in several ways, even if the psychological mechanisms at the basis of the different modifications in the creative behavior are far from being completely explained. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of different types of VEs on creative performance, with a specific focus on participants’ emotional reactions and on their individual differences in the Openness personality trait. A total of 22 participants were exposed to four different types of environments: a real room environment (RE), a control virtual environment (CVE) resembling the physical characteristics of the RE, a positive virtual environment (PVE) and a negative virtual environment (NVE). Participants were free to explore each environment for two minutes, then they were asked to perform an Alternative Uses Task for five minutes, to measure divergent thinking performance. Openness and affective reactions in each environment were measured in all participants. Results showed that Openness was associated with higher originality of responses and that this effect was particularly significant in PVE. Importantly, the type of environment interacted significantly with participants’ affective reactions in explaining their creative performance, revealing that an increase of ideas originality was associated with an increase of positive affect, emerging as a consequence of experiencing a PVE. Affective reactions to VEs, in combination with individual differences in term of Openness, thus emerge as one of the possible explicatory mechanisms of the impact of virtual reality on creative performance.

Keywords

Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G.E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–132.10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304 Search in Google Scholar

Agnoli, S., Pittarello, A., Hysenbelli, D., & Rubaltelli, E. (2015). “Give, but give until it hurts”: The modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence on the motivation to help. PloS one, 10(6), e0130704.10.1371/journal.pone.0130704 Search in Google Scholar

Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., & Turken, A.U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529 Search in Google Scholar

Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., & Nijstad, B.A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.10.1037/a0012815 Search in Google Scholar

Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55-65.10.1080/10400419.2020.1712162 Search in Google Scholar

Chirico, A., & Gaggioli, A. (2019). When virtual feels real: comparing emotional responses and presence in virtual and natural environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 220-226.10.1089/cyber.2018.0393 Search in Google Scholar

Chirico, A., Yaden, D.B., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1766.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01766 Search in Google Scholar

Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 258–267.10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627 Search in Google Scholar

Corazza, G.E., & Agnoli, S. (2020). Personality: Openness. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, 3rd Edition. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Search in Google Scholar

Corazza, G.E., & Lubart. T., (2021). Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs on the Space-Time Continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence901000110.3390/jintelligence9010001 Search in Google Scholar

Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5.10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5 Search in Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191.10.3758/BF03193146 Search in Google Scholar

Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O.D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International journal of human-computer studies, 82, 48–56.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004 Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 Search in Google Scholar

Forgas, J.P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Paris: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Goritz A.S., & Moser K. (2003). Mood and flexibility in categorization: A conceptual replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 107–119.10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.107 Search in Google Scholar

Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., & Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.02410.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024 Search in Google Scholar

Guegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206.10.1089/cyber.2016.0503 Search in Google Scholar

Isen A.M., Daubman K.A., & Nowicki G.P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122 Search in Google Scholar

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: a latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105.10.1002/per.1941 Search in Google Scholar

Kalantari, S., Rounds, J.D., Kan, J., Tripathi, V., & Cruz-Garza, J.G. (2021). Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G.E. (2019). How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas?. PloS one, 14(7), e0219298.10.1371/journal.pone.0219298 Search in Google Scholar

Michinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Le Hénaff, B. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 57–67.10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037 Search in Google Scholar

Pena, J., Hancock, J., & Merola, N. (2009). The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research, 36, 838–856.10.1177/0093650209346802 Search in Google Scholar

Ragan, E.D., Bowman, D.A., & Huber, K.J. (2012). Supporting cognitive processing with spatial information presentations in virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 16(4), 301–314.10.1007/s10055-012-0211-8 Search in Google Scholar

Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C.S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., ... & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(1), 45–56.10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 Search in Google Scholar

Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73.10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012 Search in Google Scholar

Silvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., Martinez, J.L., & Richard, C.A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthtetics Creativity and the Arts, 2, 68–85.10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68 Search in Google Scholar

Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.-M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121.10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102 Search in Google Scholar

Vergara, D., Lorenzo, M., & Rubio, M.P. (2017). Virtual environments in materials science and engineering: the students’ opinion. In Materials Science and Engineering: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1465–1483). IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

Verhaeghen P., Joormann J., & Khan R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: The relation between self- reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5, 226–232.10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.226 Search in Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa: Psychology Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, R.C., Guilford, J.P., & Christensen, P.R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362.10.1037/h0060857 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo