[
Alber, Jan. 2010. “Hypothetical Intentionalism: Cinematic Narration Reconsidered.” – Jan Alber, Monika Fludernik (eds.), Postclassical Narratology Approaches and Analyses. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 163–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnheim, Rudolf. [1954] 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Reprint. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnheim, Rudolf. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” – Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 4, 577–660.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordwell, David. 2008. Poetics of Cinema. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borgdorff, Henk. 2010. “The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research.” – Michael Biggs, Henrik Karlsson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, 44–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors.” – Cognition 75, 1, 1–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bronowski, Jacob. 2011. The Ascent of Man. New York: Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, Noël. 2000. “Interpretation and Intention: The Debate between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism.” – Metaphilosophy 31, 1–2, 75–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, Noël. 2001. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carroll, Noël. 2009. On Criticism. New York: Routledge. Chatman, Seymour. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Claxton, Guy. 2015. Intelligence in the Flesh: Why Your Mind Needs Your Body Much More Than It Thinks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2017. ‘Cinema and the Embodied Mind: Metaphor and Simulation in Understanding Meaning in Films’. – Palgrave Communications 3, 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2019. Film as Embodied Art: Bodily Meaning in the Cinema of Stanley Kubrick. Boston: Academic Studies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2020. “How Motion Shapes Thought in Cinema: The Embodied Film Style of Éric Rohmer.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and the Mind 14, 2, 26–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2023. “Embodied Visual Meaning [In] Motion.” – [in] Transition: Journal of Videographic Film & Moving Image Studies, 10, 2. https://mediacommons.org/intransition/embodied-visual-meaning-motion.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2012. “Embodied Visual Meaning: Image Schemas in Film.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 6, 2, 84–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. (eds.) 2015. Embodied Cognition and Cinema. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Slugan, Mario. 2022. “Embodying Meaning Visually: From Perceptual Dynamics to Motion Kinematics.” – Art & Perception 10, 2, 137–158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowan, Philip. 2022. Authorship and Aesthetics in the Cinematography of Gregg Toland. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Curran, Angela. 2019. “Silly Questions and Arguments for the Implicit, Cinematic Narrator.” –Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewey, John. 1925. Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagleman, David. 2015. The Brain: The Story of You. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. 2008. “Emotions in Sound: Audiovisual Metaphors in the Sound Design of Narrative Films.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 2, 2, 85–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin (ed.). 2016. Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games: Cognitive Approaches. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaudreault, André. 1988. Du littéraire au filmique. Système du récit. Paris: Klincksieck.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaut, Berys. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentner, Dedre. 2001. “Spatial Metaphors in Temporal Reasoning.” – Merideth Gattis (ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 203–222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1999. Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2005a. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2005b. “Intentionality.” – David Herman, Manfred Jahn, Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge, 247–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, James J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Golomb, Claire. 1993. “Rudolf Arnheim and the Psychology of Child Art.” – Journal of Aesthetic Education 27, 4, 11–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Golomb, Claire. 2012. The Child’s Creation of a Pictorial World. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gombrich, Ernst H. 1961. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Ewing, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gregory, Richard. 2015. Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. 5th ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gunning, Tom. 1994. D.W. Griffith and the Origins of American Narrative Film. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasson, Uri; Landesman, Ohad; Knappmeyer, Barbara; Vallines, Ignacio; Rubin, Nava; Heeger, David J. 2008. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 2, 1, 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heider, Fritz; Simmel, Marianne. 1944. “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior.” – American Journal of Psychology 57, 243–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herman, David. 2008. “Narrative Theory and the Intentional Stance.” – Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas 6, 2, 233–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirsch, Eric Donald. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hochberg, Julian. 2007. “Pictorial Functions and Perceptual Structures.” – Mary A. Peterson, Barbara Gillam, H. A. Sedgwick (eds.), In the Mind’s Eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 229–274.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hochberg, Julian, with Brooks, Virginia. 2007. “Movies in the Mind’s Eye.” – Mary A. Peterson, Barbara Gillam, H. A. Sedgwick (eds.), In the Mind’s Eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 376–395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irvin, Sherri. 2006. “Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning.” – Philosophy Compass 1, 2, 114–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iseminger, Gary. 1996. “Actual Intentionalism vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism.” – Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54, 4, 319–326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Mark. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Mark; Schulkin, Jay. 2023. Mind in Nature: John Dewey, Cognitive Science, and a Naturalistic Philosophy for Living. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandel, Eric. 2012. The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, From Vienna 1900 to the Present. New York: Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiss, Miklós; Willemsen, Steven. 2017. Impossible Puzzle Films: A Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Complex Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozloff, Sarah. 1988. Invisible Storytellers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, Jerold. 1996. “Film Music and Narrative Agency.” – David Bordwell, Noël Carroll (eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 248–282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, Jerold. 2016. Aesthetic Pursuits: Essays in Philosophy of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Szu-Yen. 2023. “Defending the Hypothetical Author.” – British Journal of Aesthetics 63, 4, 579–599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Livingston, Paisley. 2005. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Livingston, Paisley.2009. Cinema, Philosophy, Bergman: On Film as Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Livingston, Paisley. 2016. “Questions of Authorship: Some Comments on David Bordwell’s Narration in the Fiction Film.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 10, 1, 12–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotman, Elen. 2021. Experiential Heuristics in Fiction Film Cinematography. Doctoral thesis. Baltic Film, Media and Arts School.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metz, Christian. 1974. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. Michael Taylor. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, Maria J. 2011. “Primary Metaphors and Monomodal Visual Metaphors.” – Journal of Pragmatics 43, 6, 1568–1580.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, Alan. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, Michael J. 1998. “Integrated Curriculum and Our Paradigm of Cognition in the Arts.” – Studies in Art Education 39, 2, 103–116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patron, Sylvie. 2021. Optional-Narrator Theory: Principles, Perspectives, Proposals. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearlman, Karen. 2016. Cutting Rhythms: Intuitive Film Editing. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Focal Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearlman, Karen. 2019. “On Rhythm in Film Editing.” – Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearlman, Karen; Sutton, John. 2022. “Reframing the Director: Distributed Creativity in Filmmaking Practice.” – Mette Hjort, Ted Nannicelli (eds.), A Companion to Motion Pictures and Public Value. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 86–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaefer-Simmern, H. 1948. The Unfolding of Artistic Activity: Its Basis, Processes, and Implications. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, John R. 2015. Seeing Things As They Are: A Theory of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sellors, Paul C. 2007. “Collective Authorship in Film.” – Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, 3, 263–271.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seth, Anil. 2019. “From Unconscious Inference to the Beholder’s Share: Predictive Perception and Human Experience.” – European Review 27, 3, 378–410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seth, Anil. 2020. “How We Build Perception from the Inside Out.” – Aeon Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfOu14wIvM4 (July 7, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seth, Anil. 2021. Being You: A New Science of Consciousness. London: Faber & Faber.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, Lawrence A. (ed.). 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stecker, Robert. 2006. “Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended.” – Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64, 429–438.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stockwell, Peter. 2019. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stockwell, Peter; Mahlberg, Michael. 2015. “Mind-Modelling with Corpus Stylistics in David Copperfield.” – Language and Literature 24, 2, 129–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, Ed S. 2018. “A Psychology of the Film.” – Palgrave Communications 4, 1, 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terrone, Enrico. 2022. “Observers and Narrators in Fiction Film.” – Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12, 65, 201–215.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thön, Jan-Noël. 2016. Transmedial Narratology and Contemporary Media Culture. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tikka, Pia 2022. “Enactive Authorship: Second-Order Simulation of the Viewer Experience – A Neuro-cinematic Approach.” – Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 16, 1, 47–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1971. “The 2 Principles of Narrative.” – Diacritics 1, 1, 37–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tversky, Barbara. 2019. Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varela, Francisco J.; Thompson, Evan; Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yilmaz, Mehmet Burak; Lotman, Elen; Karjus, Andres; Tikka, Pia. 2023. “An Embodiment of the Cinematographer: Emotional and Perceptual Responses to Different Camera Movement Techniques.” – Frontiers in Neuro-science 17, 1160843.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zunshine, Lisa. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
