1. bookVolume 8 (2020): Issue 1 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
15 Dec 2013
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Moral Economy of Micro-Transactions in Digital Games

Published Online: 21 Dec 2020
Page range: 92 - 110
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
15 Dec 2013
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the digital game industry, micro-transactions (MTXs) have been introduced as a new vehicle for profit generation. MTXs are small sum payments for additional virtual content beyond the content players obtain through game-play and progression, which impose new structural limitations and opportunities for game participation on the players. This article explores the perspectives of players on corporate commodification strategies of gameplay. The empirical work consists of semi-structured focus group interviews of players and interviews of podcast hosts. All informants are players of various online games.

By adopting Sayer’s (2004, 2007, 2017) concept of moral economy and de Certeau’s (2011) concept of tactics in everyday life, this study draws two conclusions. First, virtual items and goods obtained through in-game activities or MTXs are a means to communicate skill level, taste, and experience between players as a fundamental part of the moral economy of establishing fair ground for competition. With regard to MTXs, players distinguish among three levels in which agency is maintained or limited. Second, players negotiate these models of commodification and agency limitation in ambivalent ways, both resisting and embracing economic values in the moral economy of play. Furthermore, because of this negotiation, players are generally concerned about the invasive nature of economic values taking priority over the values that guide the practices of play. In other words, there is a moral concern regarding how norms and values in play are compromised or overridden by outside economic pressures.

Arvidsson, Adam; Sandvik, Kjetil. 2007. ‘Gameplay as Design: Uses of Computer Players Immaterial Labour’. – Northern Lights: Film and Media Studies Yearbook 5, 1, 89–104.Search in Google Scholar

Baym, Nancy. K.; Markham, Anette. N. 2009. Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bolin, Göran. 2012. ‘The Labour Of Media Use’. – Information, Communication & Society 15, 6, 796–814.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77–101.Search in Google Scholar

Brehm, Audrey. L. 2013. ‘Navigating the feminine in massively multiplayer online games: gender in World of Warcraft’. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 903.Search in Google Scholar

Busch, Thorsten; Boudreau, Kelly; Consalvo, Mia. 2015. ‘Toxic gamer culture, corporate regulation, and standards of behaviour among players of online games’.Search in Google Scholar

In S. Conway and J. deWinter (eds.). Video Game Policy: Production, Distribution, and Consumption, 176–190. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Marcus. 2015. ‘Massively multiplayer dark play: Treacherous play in EVE Online’. In. E. Mortensen, J. Linderoth, & A. M. L. Brown (eds.). The Dark Side of Game Play: Controversial Issues in Playful Environments. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Castronova, Edward. 2006. ‘Virtual Worlds: A Firsthand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier’. – K. Salen, E. Zimmerman (eds.), The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 814–863.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Rosamund; Sigthorsson, Gauti. 2013. Introducing the Creative Industries: From Theory to Practice. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

De Certeau, Michel. 2011. Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deuze, Mark; Martin, Chase Bowen; Allen, Christian. 2007. ‘The Professional Identity of Gameworkers’. – Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 13, 4, 335–353.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, Yue; Barnes, Suart. 2007. ‘Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money’. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38, 4, 69-76.Search in Google Scholar

Goggin, Joyce. 2011. ‘Playbour, farming and labour’. – Ephemera 11, 4, 357-368.Search in Google Scholar

GREF 2019. ‘Update – Blurring of Lines Between Gambling and Gaming’. http://www.gref.net/update-blurring-of-lines-between-gambling-and-gaming/ (2 October 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Hamari, Juho; Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2010. ‘Game Design as Marketing: How Game Mechanics Create Demand for Virtual Goods’. – International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management 5, 1, 14–29.Search in Google Scholar

Higgin, Tanner. 2008. ‘Blackless Fantasy: The Disappearance of Race in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games’. Games and Culture, 4, 1, 3-26.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark Richard; Mejia, Robert. 2018. ‘Making Science Fiction Real: Neoliberalism, Real-Life and Esports in Eve Online’. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 10, 3, 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

Knaus, Christopher. 2017. ‘Gambling Regulators to Investigate “Loot Boxes” in Video Games’. https://www.theguardian.com/games/2017/nov/24/gambling-regulators-to-investigate-loot-boxes-in-video-games (24 November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Lehdonvirta, Vili. 2009. ‘Virtual item sales as a revenue model: Identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions’. Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 1-2, 97-113.Search in Google Scholar

Lehdonvirta, Vili; Wilska, Terhi-Anna; Johnson, Mikael. 2009. ‘Virtual Consumerism’. – Information, Communication & Society 12, 7, 1059–1079.Search in Google Scholar

Liboriussen, Bjarke. 2013. ‘Craft, Creativity, Computer Games: The Fusion of Play and Material Consciousness’. – Philosophy & Technology 26, 3, 273–282.Search in Google Scholar

Liboriussen, Bjarke. 2016. ‘Amateur Gold Farming in China: “Chinese Ingenuity,” Independence, and Critique. Games and Culture, 11, 3, 316–331. Liboriussen, Bjarke. 2016. ‘Amateur Gold Farming in China’’. – Games and Culture 11, 3, 316–331.Search in Google Scholar

Lizardi, Ryan. 2012. ‘DLC: Perpetual Commodification of the Video Game’. Democratic Communiqué, 25, 1, 33-45.Search in Google Scholar

Mejia, Robert; Bulut, Ergin. 2019. ‘The Cruel Optimism of Casual Games: Neocolonialism, Neoliberalism, and the Valorization of Play’. Critical Studies in Media Communication 36, 2, 156-70.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Janet. H. 1999. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, Lisa. 2009. ‘Don’t Hate the Player, Hate the Game: The Racialization of Labor in World of Warcraft’. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26, 2, 128-144.Search in Google Scholar

Sandqvist, Ulf. 2015. ‘The Games They are a Changin’: New Business Models and Transformation Within the Video Game Industry’. Humanities and Social Sciences: Latvia, 23, 2, 4-20. doi:10.22364/hsslSearch in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2000. ‘Moral Economy and Political Economy’. Studies in Political Economy, 61, 1, 79-103.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2003. ‘(De)Commodification, Consumer Culture, and Moral Economy’. – Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21, 3, 341–357.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2004. ‘Moral Economy’. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/sayer-moral-economy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. 2007. ‘Moral Economy as Critique’. – New Political Economy 12, 2, 261–270.Search in Google Scholar

Steinkuehler, Constance. 2006. ‘The mangle of play’. Games and Culture, 1, 3, 199–213.Search in Google Scholar

Tomić, Nenad. 2018. ‘Economic Model of Micro-transactions in Video Games’. – Journal of Economic Science Research 1, 1, 17–23.Search in Google Scholar

Vossen, Emma. 2018. ‘The Magic Circle and Consent in Gaming Practices’. – K.L. Gray, G. Voorhees and E. Vossen (eds), Feminism in Play, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 205-220.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo