Control of Criminal Intelligence: An Evaluation of the Lithuanian Situation in Light of International Practice

1. Andrukaitytė, Milena. “Seimas svarstys naują kriminalinės žvalgybos įstatymą: sankcionuotų tik apygardos teismai” (The Parlament will Consider a New Law on Criminal Intelligence: Only Regional Courts Would have a Right to Sanction), 2022 // https://m.diena.lt/naujienos/lietuva/salies-pulsas/seimas-svarstys-nauja-kriminalines-zvalgybos-istatyma-sankcionuotu-tik-apygardos-teismai-1070451.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bakšė, Saulė, Lietuvos advokatūra. “Dėl nekontroliuojamo sekimo Lietuvoje” (On Uncontrolled Surveillance in Lithuania). (2019) // https://www.infolex.lt/Portal/start.asp?Tema=1&str=66321.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bučiūnas, Gediminas. “Slapto pobūdžio procesinės prievartos priemonės (ikiteisminio tyrimo veiksmo) samprata” (The Meaning of Secret Character Procedural Coercive Measure (Pre-trial Investigative Action). Visuomenės saugumas ir viešoji tvarka 4 (2010): 15–22.Search in Google Scholar

4. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. “Democratic and effective oversight of national security services.” (2015) // https://book.coe.int/en/attachment?id_attachment=1373.Search in Google Scholar

5. Court of Appeal of Lithuania. “Lietuvos apeliacinis teismas pasisakė dėl kriminalinės žvalgybos subjektų veiksmų teisminės kontrolės ribų” (Lithuanian Court of Appeal Spoke about the Limits of Judicial Control of the Actions of Criminal Intelligence Entities). (2019) // https://www.apeliacinis.lt/lietuvos-apeliacinis-teismas-pasisake-del-kriminalines-zvalgybos-subjektu-veiksmu-teismines-kontroles-ribu/885.Search in Google Scholar

6. Deviatnikovaitė, Ieva, Remigijus Kalašnykas. “Parlamentinė kontrolė ir valdžių padalijimo principo įgyvendinimo problemos Lietuvoje” (Parliamentary control and problems of implementing the principle of separation of powers in Lithuania). Jurisprudencija 2, 92 (2007): 61–67.Search in Google Scholar

7. Eskens, Sarah, Ot van Daalen, Nico van Eijk. “Ten standards for oversight and transparency of national intelligence Services”. Journal of National Security Law & Policy Vol. 8, No. 3 (2016): 1–48 // https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1591.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

8. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. “Surveillance by intelligence services: fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the European Union – Volume II (Summary).” (2017) // https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2017-surveillance-intelligence-services-vol-2-summary_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Goda, Gintaras. “Operatyvinės veiklos teisinio reglamentavimo problemos ir perspektyvos” (Problems and Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Operational Activities). Teisė 58 (2006): 70–83.Search in Google Scholar

10. Goda, Gintaras. “Teisė kreiptis į teismą dėl procesinių prievartos priemonių taikymo” (The Right to Apply to the Court for the Application of Coercive Procedural Measures). Teisė 98 (2016): 27–40.Search in Google Scholar

11. Goda, Gintaras. Vertybiniai prioritetai baudžiamajame procese (Value Priorities in the Criminal Process). Vilnius: Registrų centras, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

12. Griciūnas, Paulius. “Pasikinkius “Pegasą”: elektroninių sekimo priemonių mitai ir tikrovė” (Embracing Pegasus: the Myths and Realities of Electronic Tracking Devices). (2022) // https://iq.alfa.lt/advokatas/pasikinkius-pegasa-elektroniniu-sekimo-priemoniu-mitai-ir-tikrove/243188?fbclid=IwAR0m5qkPrF0rhsHACkiUAff8hviBpiK2qXna1UPQPDPWiQ3bw1Ia_ZlswNY.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gutauskas, Aurelijus. “Kriminalinė žvalgyba ir privatus žmogaus gyvenimams” (Criminal Intelligence and the Privacy of Human Life). Teisė 113 (2019): 8–26.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kalinauskas, Gintaras. Vykdomosios valdžios (vyriausybės) parlamentinės kontrolės institutas: samprata, modeliai, įgyvendinimo problemos (Institute of Parliamentary Control of Executive Power (Government): Concept, Models, Implementation Problems). Vilnius: MRU, 2010 // https://vb.mruni.eu/object/elaba:1789329/1789329.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lithuanian Bar Association. “Dėl nekontroliuojamo sekimo Lietuvoje” (On Uncontrolled Surveillance in Lithuania). (2019) // https://www.teise.pro/index.php/2019/05/23/del-nekontroliuojamo-sekimo-lietuvoje/.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lithuanian Radio and Television. “Žurnalistų sąjunga: neteisėtas BNS sekimas turi būti ištirtas ir įvertintas” (Union of Journalists: Illegal BNS Surveillance Must Be Investigated and Assessed). (2014) // https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/60297/zurnalistu_sajunga_neteisetas_bns_sekimas_turi_buti_istirtas_ir_ivertintas.Search in Google Scholar

17. Markevičius, Edgaras. “Efektyvi teisės į privatų gyvenimą apsauga taikant kriminalinės žvalgybos priemones” (Effective Protection of the Right to Private Life by Means of Criminal Intelligence). Teisės apžvalga (2021): 46–63.Search in Google Scholar

18. Markevičius, Edgaras. “Restrictions of Criminal Intelligence Measures in Law Enforcement Directive and Law on Criminal Intelligence of Lithuania”. Socrates 3 (18) (2020): 81–88.Search in Google Scholar

19. Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. “The OSCE Project on Intelligence Led Policing 2017–2020. Project Report. From Reactive to Proactive Policing.” (2021) // https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/2/4/482610.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pankūnas, Gytis. “Vėgėlė apie “MG Baltic” politinės korupcijos bylą: jeigu po apeliacijos sprendimas liks toks pat, sakysime – STT ir prokuratūra politikavo” (Vėgėlė on the ‘MG Baltic’ Political Corruption Case: if the Decision Remains the Same after the Appeal, We Will Say – STT and the Prosecutor’s Office Played Politics”). (2022) // https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/1701604/vegele-apie-mg-baltic-politines-korupcijos-byla-jeigu-po-apeliacijos-sprendimas-liks-toks-pat-sakysime-stt-ir-prokuratura-politikavo.Search in Google Scholar

21. Research Division of the Information and Communication Department of the Seimas Chancellery. “Sanctioning and supervision of the application of special intelligence methods in the countries of the European Union.” (2020) // https://www.lrs.lt/sip/getFile3?p_fid=16381.Search in Google Scholar

22. Review Committee on the Intelligence and Security Services. “Investigation protocol.” (2000) // http://english.ctivd.nl/about-ctivd/documents/publications/2000/01/02/index.Search in Google Scholar

23. Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. “Explanatory letter regarding the Intelligence Controller of the Republic of Lithuania, Intelligence Law of the Republic of Lithuania no. VIII-1861 161, amending articles 23 and supplementing the law with article 221, amending articles 573 and 589 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Lithuania, Law on Administrative Cases of the Republic of Lithuania no. VIII-1029 Amendment of Articles 14, 18 and 112 of the Law on Controllers of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania no. VIII-950 Amendment of Articles 11 and 12 and the Law on Remuneration of State Politicians and State Officials of the Republic of Lithuania no. VIII-1904 Amendment of Article 2 and Appendix, Law on Property Declaration of Residents of the Republic of Lithuania no. I-1338 of draft laws amending Article 2.” 2021 // https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/rs/lasupplement/TAP/e91ed060cff511eb91e294a1358e77e9/aaaf340cd66211eb866fe2e083228059/format/ISO_PDF/.Search in Google Scholar

24. Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. “Draft Law on Amendment of Criminal intelligence law no. XI-2234 Articles 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15.” (2021) // https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAP/bfefd650750311eb9fc9c3970976dfa1.Search in Google Scholar

25. “Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. Explanatory letter on Draft Law on Controllers of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania no. VIII-950 on Amendments to Articles 3, 6, 7, 9 and 11 and the Draft Law on Intelligence Law of the Republic of Lithuania no. viii-1861, amending Articles 5, 12, 16 and 24.” (2020) // https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/rs/lasupplement/TAP/ca78f8012a3911eb8c97e01ffe050e1c/17e52730349411eb8c97e01ffe050e1c/format/ISO_PDF/.Search in Google Scholar

26. Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania. “Ar tikrai STT vykdoma kriminalinė žvalgyba (ne)kontroliuojama?” (Is the Criminal Intelligence Conduct-ed by STT Really (Un)controlled?). (2021) // https://www.stt.lt/infocentras/4993/mitas-2-kriminaline-zvalgyba-nekontroliuojama:3108.Search in Google Scholar

27. Šalčius, Marijus, Mindaugas Bilius. “Baudžiamojo proceso pažeidimu padarytos žalos atlyginimo teisinis reguliavimas ir vertinimo teismų praktikoje problematika” (Legal Regulation of Compensation for Damage Caused by Violation of the Criminal Process and the Problem of Assessment in Court Practice). Teisės apžvalga 2 (14) (2016): 360–376.Search in Google Scholar

28. “The Swedish Commission on Security and Integrity Protection” // http://www.sakint.se/the-swedish-commission-on-security-and-integrity-protection/.Search in Google Scholar

29. Tzu, Sun. The Art of War. Leicester: Allandale Online Publishing, 2000 // https://sites.ualberta.ca/~enoch/Readings/The_Art_Of_War.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

30. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. “Criminal Intelligence. Manual for Analysts.” (2011) // https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Law-Enforcement/Criminal_Intelligence_for_Analysts.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

31. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. “Criminal Intelligence. Manual for Managers.” (2011) // https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Law-Enforcement/Criminal_Intelligence_for_Managers.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

1. Law on Criminal Intelligence of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2012, No. 122-6093.Search in Google Scholar

2. Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union, 2016, L 119/89.Search in Google Scholar

3. Drakšas v. Lithuania. European Court of Human Rights, 2012, application no. 36662/04.Search in Google Scholar

4. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950.Search in Google Scholar

5. Klass and others v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights, 1978, application no. 5029/71.Search in Google Scholar

6. Laki tiedustelutoiminnan valvonnasta (Law on the Supervision of Intelligence Activities). Official Gazette (2019, no. 121/2019) // https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2019/20190121.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lavrechov v. the Czech Republic. European Court of Human Rights, 2013, application no. 57404/08.Search in Google Scholar

8. Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, European Court of Justice, 2015, No. C-362/14.Search in Google Scholar

9. Roman Zakharov v. Russia. European Court of Human Rights, 2015, application no. 47143/06.Search in Google Scholar

10. State v. J.V. and J.A. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015, no. 2KP-94-895/2015.Search in Google Scholar

11. State v. R.I. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2016, no. 2K-208-788/2016.Search in Google Scholar

12. Statute of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, no. 15–249.Search in Google Scholar

13. S.Š v. State. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2019, no. e3K-3-353-313/2019.Search in Google Scholar

14. Tele2 Sverige AB vs. Post-och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department vs Tom Watson & Ors. European Court of Justice, 2016, no. C-203/15 and C-698/15.Search in Google Scholar

15. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling “On the compliance of the fifth part of Article 195 and Article 242 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania”, 1997, No. 7/97.Search in Google Scholar