1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Party Autonomy in the Context of Jurisdictional and Choice of Law Rules of Matrimonial Property Regulation

Published Online: 18 Mar 2021
Page range: 135 - 158
Received: 23 Nov 2020
Accepted: 30 Dec 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In 2019, the EU Member States started applying the Matrimonial Property Regulation, which concerns the property regimes of international marriages. This regulation is aimed at helping couples manage their property and divide it in case of divorce or the death of one spouse. One of the main features of this regulation is its openness to the parties’ choice. The parties are enabled – in cases foreseen in the regulation – to grant jurisdiction to the court of a Member State of their choice, as well as to choose the law applicable to their matrimonial property regime. Since this regulation is new and the track record of its application is rather short, the limits of party autonomy allowed under the regulation and its advantages still involve a high degree of uncertainty. This article provides an in-depth analysis of party autonomy as provided for in the Matrimonial Property Regulation. In addition, it scrutinises the issue of party autonomy in the Succession Regulation, which often directly interacts with the Matrimonial Property Regulation.

Keywords

1. Ballesteros, Mớnica Herranz. “The Regime of Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Recast: The Solutions Adopted for Agreements on Jurisdiction.” Journal of Private International Law 10 (2014): 291-308. Search in Google Scholar

2. Cazorla Gonzáles, Maria Jose, Manuela Giobbi, Jerca Kramberger Škerl, Lucia Ruggeri, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Property relations of cross border couples in the European Union. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

3. Damascelli, Domenico. “Applicable law, jurisdiction, and recognition of decisions in matters relating to property regimes of spouses and partners in European and Italian private international law.” Trusts & Trustees Vol. 25, No. 1 (2018): 6–16. Search in Google Scholar

4. De Boer, Theodorus Martinus. “Party autonomy and its limitations in the Rome II regulation.” Yearbook of Private International Law 9 (2007): 19-29. Search in Google Scholar

5. Dolžan, Judita. “Uredbi (EU) glede premoženjskopravnih razmerij za mednarodne pare – kolizijska pravila”. Odvetnik 2 (2019): 106–113. Search in Google Scholar

6. Franzina, Pietro. “Article 7 Choice of court”: 85–92. In: Ilaria Viarengo and Pietro Franzina. The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples. A Commentary. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

7. Grieco, Cristina. “The role of party autonomy under the Regulations on matrimonial property regimes and property consequences of registered partnerships. Some remarks on the coordination between the legal regime established by the new regulations and other relevant instruments of European private international law.” Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional Vol. 10, No. 2, (2018): 457–476 // DOI: 10.20318/cdt.2018.4384. Search in Google Scholar

8. Koumpli, Vassiliki, and Vassiliki Marazopoulou. “Greece”: 287–310. In: Lucia Ruggeri, Ivana Kunda, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Family Property and Succession in EU Member States National Reports on the Collected Data. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Pravni fakultet, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

9. Kruger, Thalia. “Finding a Habitual Residence”: 74–89. In: Ilaria Viarengo and Francesca C. Villata, eds. Planning the Future of Cross Border Families: A Path Through Coordination. Hart Publishing, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

10. Kuipers, Jan-Jaap. “Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and the European Court of Justice.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 1505-1525. Search in Google Scholar

11. Limante, Agne, and Ivana Kunda. “Jurisdiction in Parental Responsibility Matters”: 61–91. In: Costanza Honorati, ed. Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility and International Abduction. A Handbook on the Application of Brussels IIa Regulation in National Courts. Torino: Peter Lang, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

12. Limante, Agne. “Establishing Habitual Residence of Adults under the Brussels IIa Regulation: Best Practices from National Case-law.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 14, No. 1 (2018): 160–181 // https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2018.1442128. Search in Google Scholar

13. Mandery, Maya. Party Autonomy in Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations. A European and Anglo-Common Law perspective on the freedom of choice of law in the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations. Bern: Peter Lang, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

14. Maultzsch, Felix. “Party Autonomy in European Private International Law: Uniform Principle or Context-Dependent Instrument?” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 12, No. 3 (2016): 466–491 // DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2016.1257846. Search in Google Scholar

15. Plevri, Anna. “Cyprus”: 93–122. In: Lucia Ruggeri, Ivana Kunda, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Family Property and Succession in EU Member States National Reports on the Collected Data. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Pravni fakultet, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

16. Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, Neža. “Applicable law in matrimonial property regime disputes.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Vol. 40, No. 3 (2019): 1075–1096 // DOI: 10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.5. Search in Google Scholar

17. Poretti, Paula. “Odlučivanje o imovinskim odnosima bračnih drugova u ostavinskim postupcima sukladno Uredbi 2016/1103 o bračnoimovinskom režimu.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Vol. 38, No. 1 (2017): 449–471. Search in Google Scholar

18. Rudolf, Claudia. “Premoženjska razmerja med zakonci v mednarodnem zasebnem pravu.” Podjetje in delo 6-7 (2018): 952–963. Search in Google Scholar

19. Symeonides, Symeon C. Choice of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

20. Symeonides, Symeon C. “Party Autonomy in Rome I and IΙ from a Comparative Perspective”: 513-550. In: Katharina Boele-Woelki, Thalia Einhorn, Daniel Girsberger, and Symeon Symeonides, eds. Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law - Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr. Eleven International Publishing, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

21. Valentová, Lucia. “Property Regimes of Spouses and Partners in New EU Regulations – Jurisdiction, Prorogation and Choice of Law.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 16, No. 2 (2016): 221–240 // DOI: 10.1515/iclr-2016-0026. Search in Google Scholar

22. Viarengo, Ilaria. “Choice of Law Agreements in Property Regimes, Divorce, and Succession: Stress-testing the New EU Regulations.” ERA Forum 17 (2016): 543–554. Search in Google Scholar

23. Walker, Lara. “Party Autonomy, Inconsistency and the Specific Characteristics of Family Law in the EU.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 14, No. 2 (2018): 225–261 // DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2018.1509973. Search in Google Scholar

24. Wautelet, Patrick R., “Party Autonomy in International Family Relationships: A Research Agenda” (November 2020) // https://ssrn.com/abstract=2589980. Search in Google Scholar

25. Weller, Marc-Philippe, and Rentsch, Bettina. “‘Habitual Residence’: A Plea for ‘Settled Intention’”: 171–187. In: Stefan Leible, ed. General Principles of European Private International Law. Wolters Kluwer, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

1. Case C-497/10 PPU Mercredi. EU:C:2010:829. Search in Google Scholar

2. Case C-111/17 PPU OL v PQ. EU:C:2017:436. Search in Google Scholar

3. Case C-218/16, Kubicka. EU:C:2017:755. Search in Google Scholar

4. Case C-376/14 PPU C. EU:C:2014:2268. Search in Google Scholar

5. Case C-393/18 UD v XB. EU:C:2018:835. Search in Google Scholar

6. Case C-499/15 W and V. EU:C:2017:118. Search in Google Scholar

7. Case C-512/17 HR. EU:C:2018:513. Search in Google Scholar

8. Case C-523/07 A. EU:C:2009:225. Search in Google Scholar

9. Case C-558/16 Mahnkopf. EU:C:2018:138. Search in Google Scholar

10. Case C-658/17 WB. EU:C:2019:444. Search in Google Scholar

11. Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000. OJ L 338, 23/12/2003, p. 1-29 Search in Google Scholar

12. Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations. OJ L 7, 10.1.2009, p. 1–79. Search in Google Scholar

13. Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes. OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 1–29. Search in Google Scholar

14. Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships. OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 30–56. Search in Google Scholar

15. Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 of 25 June 2019 on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction. OJ L 178, 2.7.2019, p. 1–115. Search in Google Scholar

16. Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. OJ L 343, 29.12.2010, p. 10–16. Search in Google Scholar

17. Hague Convention of 14 March 1978 on the Law Applicable to Matrimonial Property Regimes // https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=87. Search in Google Scholar

18. Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements // https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=98. Search in Google Scholar

19. Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations. Council Decision of 30 November 2009 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations. OJ L 331, 16.12.2009, p. 17–23. Search in Google Scholar

20. Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes. COM/2016/0106 final - 2016/059 (CNS). Search in Google Scholar

21. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and authentic instruments in matters of succession and the creation of a European Certificate of Succession. {SEC(2009) 410} {SEC (2009)411} COM/2009/0154 final – COD 2009/0157*. Search in Google Scholar

22. Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession. OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 107–134. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo