[1. Anechiarico, Frank, and James B. Jacobs. How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bardhan, Pranap. “Corruption and development: A review of issues.” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (3) (1996): 1320–1346.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Batory, Agnes. “Post-accession malaise? EU conditionality, domestic politics and anti-corruption policy in Hungary.” Global Crime 11 (2010): 164–177.10.1080/17440571003669183]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Becker, Gary and George J. Stigler. “Law enforcement, malfeasance and the compensation of enforcers.” Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1974): 1–19.10.1086/467507]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bryer, Thomas A. “Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions.” Public Administration Review 69(2) (2009): 271–283.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01973.x]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Caiden, Gerald E., and Naomi J. Caiden. “Administrative corruption.” Public Administration Review 37 (1977): 301–309.10.2307/974828]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Charron, Nicholas, Lewis Dijkstra, and Victor Lapuente. “Regional governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States.” Regional Studies 48 (2014): 68–90.10.1080/00343404.2013.770141]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Christensen, Jørgen G. “Pay and prerequisites for government executives”: 102–129: In: B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, eds. The SAGE handbook of public administration. 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.10.4135/9781446200506.n7]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cooper, Terry. L. “Hierarchy, virtue, and the practice of public administration: A perspective for normative ethics.” Public Administration Review 47 (1987): 320–328.10.2307/975312]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Council of Europe. GRECO RESOLUTION (97) 24 “On the twenty guiding principles for the fight against corruption” (1997) // https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent? documentId=09000016806dd0ea.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dahlström, Carl, Victor Lapuente, and Jan Teorell. “The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2012): 656–668.10.1177/1065912911408109]Search in Google Scholar
[12. De Graaf, Gjalt. “A report on reporting: Why peers report integrity and law violations in public organizations.” Public Administration Review 70 (2010): 767–779.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02204.x]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Demmke, Christoph, and Timo Moilanen. Civil services in the EU of 27: Reform outcomes and the future of the civil service. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2010.10.3726/978-3-653-00038-2]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Drechsler, Wolfgang. “Governance, good Governance, and government: The case for Estonian administrative capacity.” Trames (2004): 388–396.10.3176/tr.2004.4.04]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Drechsler, Wolfgang. “The re-emergence of Weberian public administration after the fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European perspective.” Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 6 (2005): 94–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Evans, Peter, and James E. Rauch. “Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (1999): 748–765.10.2307/2657374]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Gingerich, David W. “Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: Empirical findings from South America.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (2012): 505–540.10.1017/S0007123412000403]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Guy, Mary. “Mom work versus dad work in local government.” Administration and Society 49 (2016): 48–64 // DOI:10.1177/0095399716641989.10.1177/0095399716641989]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Hassan, Shahidul, Bradley E. Wright, and Gary Yukl. “Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems.” Public Administration Review 74 (2014): 333–343.10.1111/puar.12216]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Hofmann, Herwig C.H. “Mapping the European administrative space.” West European Politics 31 (2008): 662–676.10.1080/01402380801905918]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Holmes, Leslie. Rotten states? Corruption, post-communism and neoliberalism. Duke UP: Durham 2006.10.1515/9780822387732]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Hunt, Jennifer. “Why are some public officials more corrupt than others?”: 323–351. In: Susan Rose-Ackerman, ed. International handbook on the economics of corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2006.10.3386/w11595]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Jansone, Dace, and Iveta Reinholde. “Politico-administrative relations: The case of Latvia”: 203-225. In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Politico-administrative relations. Who rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Jávor, István, and David Janicsics. “The role of power in organizational corruption: An empirical study.” Administration and Society 48 (2016): 527–58.10.1177/0095399713514845]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Korruption i post-kommunistiske lande: et forbigående eller permanent fænomen” (Corruption in post-communist countries). Nordisk Østforum 22, No. 3-4 (2008): 271–287 [in Danish].]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “The institutional roots of anti-corruption policies: comparing the three Baltic states.” Journal of Baltic Studies 42 (2011): 329–346.10.1080/01629778.2011.597128]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Path making: Democracy in the Baltic States twenty years after.” Politics in Central Europe 7 (2011): 57–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Johannsen, Lars, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “How to combat corruption: Assessing anti-corruption measures from a civil servant’s perspective.” Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture 13 (2012): 130–146.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Johannsen, Lars, Karin Hilmer Pedersen, and Saulius Pivoras. “Falling between two stools – the case of the Lithuanian civil servant reform of 2013.” Journal of comparative politics 8 (2015): 34–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Johannsen, Lars, Eva Maria Olafsson, and Karin Hilmer Pedersen. “Women the fairer sex: Gendered attitudes towards corruption and experiences with bribery”: 121–130. In: Brenda Davis, ed. Corruption: Political, economic and social issues. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Karklins, Rasma. “Typology of post-communist corruption.” Problems of post-communism Vol. 49 (2002): 22–32.10.1080/10758216.2002.11655993]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Kathi, Pradeep C., and Terry L. Cooper. “Democratizing the administrative state: connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies.” Public Administration Review 65 (2005): 559–567.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00483.x]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Klitgaard, Robert. Controlling corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.10.1525/9780520911185]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Knack, Stephen. “Measuring corruption: A critique of indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (2007): 255–291.10.1017/S0143814X07000748]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Lambsdorff, Johan G. The institutional economic of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511492617]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Latham, Gary P., and Edwin A. Locke. “Self-regulation through goal setting.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991): 212–247.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Lazareviciute, Ieva, Jovita Tirviene, and Jonas Poniskaitis. “Politico-administrative relations in Lithuania”: 226–267. In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Politico-administrative Relations Who rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Liu, Cheol, and John. L. Mikesell. “The impact of public officials? Corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending.” Public Administration Review 74 (2014): 346–359.10.1111/puar.12212]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Maegher, Patrick. “Anti-corruption agencies: Theory Versus Reality” The Journal of Policy Reform 8 (2005): 69–103.10.1080/1384128042000328950]Search in Google Scholar
[40. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Mbaku, John M. “Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: The futility of cleanups.” Cato Journal 16 (1996): 99–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, and Kim S. Mikkelsen. “Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries.” Public administration 94 (2016): 1105–1123.10.1111/padm.12276]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Miller, William L., Åse B. Grodeland, and Tatyana Y. Koshechkina. A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. NY: Central European University Press, 2001.10.1515/9789633865095]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Mishra, Ajit. “Corruption, hierarchies and bureaucratic structure”: 189–215: In: Susan Rose-Ackerman, ed. International handbook on the economics of corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.10.4337/9781847203106.00014]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Montinola, Gabriella R., and Robert W. Jackman. “Sources of corruption: A cross-country study.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2002): 147–170.10.1017/S0007123402000066]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Muhhina, Kristina. “Governing ‘Transition’: The Discoursive Construction of Public Administration in Post-Cold War Estonia.” Administration and Society 49 (2017): 575–611.10.1177/0095399715581036]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. The quest for good governance. How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316286937]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Nakrošis, Vitalis. “The quantitative and qualitative analysis of public administration reforms in post-communist countries.” Baltic Journal of Political Science 6 (2017): 7–28.10.15388/BJPS.2017.6.10741]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Nakrošis, Vitalis, and Mantas Budraitis. “Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990-2010.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (2012): 820–831.10.1080/01900692.2012.715566]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Navot, Doron, Yaniv Reingewertz, and Nissim Cohen. “Speed or greed? High wages and corruption among public servants.” Administration and Society 48 (2016): 580–601.10.1177/0095399715623313]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Nørgaard, Ole, and Lars Johannsen. The Baltic States after independence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Nunberg, Barbara. Ready for Europe. Public administration reform and European Union accession in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. O’Dwyer, Conor. Runaway state-building. Patronage, politics and democratic development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Olsen, Johan. P. “The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 13–37.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.101806]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Osborne, Stephen P. “Editorial. The new public governance?” Public Management Review 8 (2006): 277–387.10.1080/14719030600853022]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Osborne, Stephen P. “Delivering public services: Time for a new theory?” Public Management Review 12 (2010): 1–10 // DOI: 10.1080/147190303495232.10.1080/147190303495232]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[57. Ostrom, Elinor. “Analyzing collective action.” International Association of Agricultural Economists 41 (2010): 155–166.10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Painter, Martin, and B Guy. Peters. Tradition and public administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.10.1057/9780230289635]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Palidauskaite, Jolanta. “The Value Profile of Civil Servants in new European Democracies through the Lens of Embedded Ethics”: 186–207. In: Michiels S. de Vries and Pan S. Kim, eds. Value and Virtue in Public Administration. A comparative Perspective. London; Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.10.1057/9780230353886_10]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Panagiotou, Ritsa A. “Estonia’s success: Prescription or legacy?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34 (2001): 261–277.10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00005-8]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Pedersen, Karin Hilmer, and Lars Johannsen. “European values and practices in post-communist public administration. The Baltic States”: 219–241: In: Patrick Overeem and Fritz. Sager, eds. The European public servant. A shared administrative identity. ECPR press, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Pedersen, Karin Hilmer, and Lars Johannsen. “Where and how you sit. How civil servants view citizens’ participation.” Administration & Society 48 (2016): 104–129.10.1177/0095399714555753]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Perry, James L., Annie Hondeghem, and Lois R. Wise. “Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future.” Public Administration Review 70 (2010): 681–690.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Persson, Anna, Bo Rothstein, and Jan Teorell. “Why anticorruption reforms fail— systemic corruption as a collective action problem.” Governance 26 (2013): 449–471.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Peters, B. Guy. “Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination.” Public Administration 76 (1998): 295–311.10.1111/1467-9299.00102]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Pollitt, Christopher, and Gert Bouckaert. Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford: University Press, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Randma-Liiv, Tiina, and Jane Järvalt. “Public personnel policies and problems in the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13 (2011): 35–49.10.1080/13876988.2011.538537]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Randma-Liiv, Tiina. “Demand- and supply-based policy transfer in Estonian public administration.” Journal of Baltic Studies 36 (2005): 467–487.10.1080/01629770500000211]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Randma-Liiv, Tiina. “Performance management in transitional administration: Introduction of pay-for-performance in the Estonian civil service.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 7 (2005): 95–115.10.1080/13876980500084733]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Rauch, James E., and Peter B. Evans. “Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75 (2000): 49–71.10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Rijckegman, Caroline von, and Beatrice Weder. “Corruption and the rate of temptation: Do low wages in the civil service cause corruption?” IMF Working Paper 73 (Washington, D.C., IMF, 1997).]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. “Which bureaucracies are less corruptible?”: 803–826. In: Arnold J. Heidenheimer, Michael Johnston, and Victor T. LeVine, eds. Political corruption. A handbook. New Braunswik and Oxford: Transaction Publishers, 1989 [1978].]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Rothstein, Bo, and Jan Teorell. “What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions.” Governance 21 (2008): 165–190.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Rothstein, Bo. “What is the opposite of corruption?” Third World Quarterly 35 (2014): 737–752.10.1080/01436597.2014.921424]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Rubin, Ellen V., and Andrew Whitford. “Effects of the institutional design of the civil service: Evidence from corruption.” International Public management Journal 11 (2008): 404–425.10.1080/10967490802491095]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Sarapuu, Külli. “Administrative structures in times of changes: The development of Estonian ministries and government agencies 1990-2010.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (2012): 808–819.10.1080/01900692.2012.715561]Search in Google Scholar
[77. SIGMA. “European principles for public administration.” Sigma Papers No. 27 (1999) // http://www.oecd.org/site/sigma/publicationsdocuments/36972467.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Sootla, Georg. “Evolution of roles of politicians and civil servants during the post-communist transition in Estonia”: 107–146: In: Tony Verheijen, ed. Who rules? Politico-administrative relations. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Sööt, Mari-Liis, and Kadri Rootalu. “Institutional trust and opinions of corruption.” Public Administration and Development 32 (2012): 82–95 // DOI: 10.1002/pad.61610.1002/pad.616]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[80. Treisman, Daniel. “The causes of corruption: A cross-national study.” Journal of Public Economics 76 (2000): 399–457.10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Treisman, Daniel. “What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007): 211–244.10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013 [1968].]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Wei, Shang-Jin. “Corruption in economic development: Beneficial grease, minor annoyance, or major obstacle?” Policy research working paper No. WPS 2048 (Washington DC, World Bank, 1999) // http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/175291468765621959/Corruption-in-economic-development-beneficial-grease-minor-annoyance-or-major-obstacle.10.1596/1813-9450-2048]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Yang, Kaifeng, and Kathe Callahan. “Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality.” Public Administration Review 67 (2007): 249–264.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Zhang, Yahong, and Kaifeng Yang. “Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management 21 (2009): 289–317.10.1108/JPBAFM-21-02-2009-B006]Search in Google Scholar