1. bookVolume 12 (2022): Issue 1 (May 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Digital Integrity: A Foundation for Digital Rights and the New Manifestation of Human Dignity

Published Online: 23 Jun 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2022) - Issue 1 (May 2022)
Page range: 159 - 185
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article is devoted to the research of the problematic aspects and modern challenges of data protection in the digital age from the perspective of the digital integrity of the person. We believe that personal data cannot be effectively protected as components of digital integrity of the person in the context of regulation of a separate right to personal data protection, which, in its turn, acts more as a tool of market regulation rather than a classical fundamental right. We argue that the consideration of digital integrity as a new foundation for digital rights and as a new manifestation of the restrictive concept of human dignity may help increase the level of effective protection of the person in the digital sphere as well as properly cover the existing gaps in the protection of the digital rights of the person.

Keywords

A European Strategy for Data (2020), Communications from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee and the Committee of the regions, COM (2020)66 final, 19.2.2020. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-european-strategy-data-19feb2020_en.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Addis, A. (2015), ‘Human dignity in comparative constitutional context: In search of an overlapping consensus,’ Tulane Public Law Research Paper, no. 15-11. Search in Google Scholar

A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe (2015), Analysis and Evidence Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2015)192 final, SWD (2015) 100 final, 6.5.2015. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015SC0100&rid=1 [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Andorno, R. (2009), ‘Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics,’ The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhp02319386998 Search in Google Scholar

Andraško, J. & Mesarčík, M. (2021), ‘Those who shall be identified: The data protection aspects of the legal framework for electronic identification in the European Union,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Artificial Intelligence for Europe (2018), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2018)237 final, 25.4.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Barbey, G. (2019), ‘Il est temps de reconnaître l’intégrité numérique des individus,’ Le Temps, 25 January. Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, J. P. (1996), ‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,’ Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Becerill, A. (2018), ‘The value of our personal data in the Big Data and the Internet of All Things Era,’ ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 71–79. https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ2018727180 Search in Google Scholar

Benn, S. I. (1984), ‘Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons,’ in F. D. Schoeman (ed.) Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625138.009 Search in Google Scholar

Beyleveld, D. & Brownsword, R. (2001), Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

CJEU (2017), Press Release no. 84/17 Luxembourg, Opinion 1/15, Court of Justice of the European Union, 26.7.2017. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-07/cp170084en.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Declaration on Ethics and Data Protection in Artificial Intelligence (2018), 40th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Brussels. Retrieved from http://globalprivacyassembly.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/20180922_ICDPPC-40th_AI-Declaration_ADOPTED.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

De Franceschi, A. & Lehmann, M. (2015), ‘Data as tradeable commodity and new measures for their protection,’ The Italian Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–72. Search in Google Scholar

de Hingh, A. & Lodder, A. R. (2020, forthcoming), ‘The role of human dignity in processing (health) data building on the organ trade prohibition,’ in T. Synodinou, Ph. Jougleux, Ch. Markou & Th. Prastitou (eds.) EU Internet Law in The Digital Era, Springer. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3453302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_12 Search in Google Scholar

Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v. Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kärntner Landesregierung and Others [2014], CJEU Joined cases C 293/12 and C 594/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:238, 8.4.2014. Search in Google Scholar

EDPS (2015), Opinion 4/2015, Towards a New Digital Ethics: Data, Dignity and Technology, European Data Protection Supervisor, September 2015. Retrieved from https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/15-09-11_data_ethics_en.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (n.d.), ‘Data protection in the EU.’ Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_en [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2005), ‘The ontological interpretation of informational privacy,’ Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 7, pp. 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0001-7 Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1975), The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, transl. by A. M. Sheridan Smith, New York: Vintage Books. Search in Google Scholar

František Ryneš v. Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů [2014], CJEU Case C212/13; ECLI:EU:C:2014:2428, 11.12.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González [2014], CJEU Case C131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317, 13.5.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Hamuľák, O.; Kiss, L.; Gábriš, T. & Kocharyan, H. (2021), ‘“This content is not available in your country”: A general summary on geo-blocking in and outside the European Union,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 153–183. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0006 Search in Google Scholar

Janeček, V. (2018), ‘Ownership of personal data in the Internet of Things,’ Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.007 Search in Google Scholar

Ježová, D. (2020), ‘Sharing economy in digital single market: EU—a phenomena with future potential,’ European Studies: The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, vol. 7, pp. 218–236. Search in Google Scholar

J. Nold, Kohlen- und Baustoffgroßhandlung v. Commission of the European Communities [1975], CJEU Case 4-73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:51, 14.5.1975. Search in Google Scholar

Joamets, K. & Chochia, A. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence and its impact on labour relations in Estonia,’ Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 255−277. https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200204 Search in Google Scholar

Joamets, K. & Chochia, A. (2021), ‘Access to artificial intelligence for persons with disabilities: Legal and ethical questions concerning the application of trustworthy AI,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51−66. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2021.1.04 Search in Google Scholar

Kasket, E. (2019), ‘Mourning and memorialization on social media,’ in A. Attrill-Smith, C. Fullwood, M. Keep & D. J. Kuss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.013.26 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T.; Hamuľák, O. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘A historical study of contemporary human rights: Deviation or extinction?’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98−115. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2016.2.06. Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (2001), ‘Phenomenology of digital-being, Human Studies,’ vol. 24, pp. 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763028785 Search in Google Scholar

Kocharyan, H.; Vardanyan, L.; Hamuľák, O. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘Critical views on the right to be forgotten after the entry into force of the GDPR: Is it able to effectively ensure our privacy?’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0015 Search in Google Scholar

Malgieri, G. (2016), ‘Property and (intellectual) ownership of consumers’ information: A new taxonomy for personal data,’ Privacy in Germany, vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2196-9817.2016.04.05 Search in Google Scholar

Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner [2015], CJEU Case C-362/14; ECLI:EU:C:2015:650, 6.10.2015. Search in Google Scholar

Mittelstadt, B. D. & Floridi, L. (2016), The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4 Search in Google Scholar

Monti, A. & Wacks R. (2019), Protecting Personal Information: The Right to Privacy Reconsidered, Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509924882 Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1995), ‘Objectification,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x Search in Google Scholar

Ohm, P. (2010), ‘Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization,’ UCLA Law Review, vol. 57, pp. 1701–1777. Search in Google Scholar

Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v. Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn [2004], CJEU Case C-36/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:614, 4.10.2004. Search in Google Scholar

Purtova, N. (2018), ‘The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law,’ Law, Innovation and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176 Search in Google Scholar

Rechnungshof (C-465/00) v. Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others and Christa Neukomm (C-138/01) and Joseph Lauermann (C-139/01) v. Österreichischer Rundfunk [2003], CJEU Joined cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:294, 20.5.2003. Search in Google Scholar

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88. Search in Google Scholar

Richterich, R. (2019), ‘L’intégrité numérique: le vrai combat pour nos données,’ Le Temps, 11 January. Search in Google Scholar

Roussel, A. (2020), ‘The right to digital integrity of the human person,’ Digitale Bürger*innerechte, 21 February. Retrieved from https://www.fabrikzeitung.ch/the-right-to-digital-integrity-of-the-human-person/#/ [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom [2008], Applications nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, European Court of Human Rights, 4.12.2008, p. 75. Search in Google Scholar

Santini, A. & Bensoussan, A. (2000), ‘Livre blanc sur les droits de l’homme numérique.’ Retrieved from https://www.alain-bensoussan.com/wp-content/uploads/39889121.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, P. & Solove, D. (2011), ‘The PII problem: Privacy and a new concept of personally identifiable information,’ New York University Law Review, vol. 86, pp. 1814–1898. Search in Google Scholar

Sweeney, L. (2000), Simple Demographics Often Identify People Uniquely, Carnegie Mellon University, Data Privacy Working Paper 3. Search in Google Scholar

Tietosuojavaltuutettu v. Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy [2008], CJEU Case C-73/07: ECLI:EU:C:2008:727, 16.12.2008. Search in Google Scholar

Urgessa, W. G. (2016), ‘The feasibility of applying EU data protection law to biological materials: Challenging ‘data’ as exclusively informational,’ JIPITEC: Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2840764 Search in Google Scholar

van Beers, B. C. (2009), Persoon en Lichaam in het Recht. Menselijkewaardigheid en zelfbeschikking in het tijdperk van de medischebiotechnologie, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Search in Google Scholar

van der Sloot, B. (2017), ‘Legal fundamentalism: Is data protection really a fundamental right?’ in R. Leenes, R. van Brakel, S. Gutwirth & P. De Hert (eds.) Data Protection and Privacy: (In)visibilities and Infrastructures, Cham: Springer, pp. 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50796-5_1 Search in Google Scholar

Vardanyan, L. & Stehlík, V. (2020), ‘Is the case law of ECtHR ready to prevent the expansion of mass surveillance in post-COVID Europe?’ European Studies, vol. 7, pp. 253–272. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo