1. bookVolume 57 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-577X
First Published
17 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Measuring change in longitudinal research on pragmatic competence: A multinomial logistic model

Published Online: 31 Dec 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 57 (2020) - Issue 2 (December 2020)
Page range: 195 - 220
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-577X
First Published
17 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Summary

This paper focuses on pragmatic competence development in second or foreign language learners. In particular, it attempts to fill the significant research gap in measuring change in pragmatic competence and capturing pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic development over time. The paper proposes an innovative approach by applying a logistic model with multinomial distribution for measuring change in InterLanguage Pragmatics Research (ILP). Applied in the field of pragmatics, this statistical tool offers a comprehensive and flexible approach to modelling relations between independent and dependent variables in ILP research. The model is tested in a longitudinal study of Polish undergraduate students learning English, and specifically in the way they formulate requests by means of requestive directness strategies. The paper concludes that, regardless of time elapsing, the factors P (power distance) and D (social distance) have a highly significant influence on the use of requestive directness strategies by Poles learning EFL. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the pragmatic output of Poles learning EFL is dependent on one more independent variable: the estimation of future social distance (F).

Keywords

Agresti A. (1984): Analysis of ordinal categorical data. Wiley, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Alcón-Soler E. (2015): Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System 48: 62–74.10.1016/j.system.2014.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Bakinowska E. (2004). Analyzing experiments by generalised linear models. Biometrical Letters 41(2): 37–49Search in Google Scholar

Barron A. (2000): Acquiring ’different strokes’: A longitudinal study of the development of L2 pragmatic competence. German as a Foreign Language 2: 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Barron A. (2003): Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics. Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/pbns.108Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different. J. of Pragmatics 11: 131–146.Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka S., House J., Kasper G. (eds.) (1989): Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Search in Google Scholar

Brown P., Levinson S. (1987): Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Decoo W. (1996): The induction-deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities of the didactic reality. Int. Rev. of Applied Linguistics in Lg. Teaching 34: 95–118.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser B. (1990): Perspectives on politeness. J. of Pragmatics 14(2): 219–236.10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-NSearch in Google Scholar

Ghavamnia M., Tavakoli M., Rezazadeh M. (2011): A comparative study of requests among L2 English, L1 Persian, and L1 English speakers. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 10: 105–123.Search in Google Scholar

Glaser K. (2014): Inductive or deductive? The impact of method of instruction on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in EFL. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.Search in Google Scholar

Gomez-Laich M.P. (2016): Second language learners’ divergence from target language pragmatic norms. Studies in 2nd LG. Learning and Teaching 6(2): 249–269.10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.4Search in Google Scholar

Hudson T. (2001): Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative tools. In Rose K.R., Kasper G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, 283–300. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.019Search in Google Scholar

Hudson T., Detmer E., Brown J.D. (1995): Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i, Manoa, HI.Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski A. (1994): Pragmatic failure in a second language: Greeting responses in English by Polish students. IRAL 1: 41–55.10.1515/iral.1994.32.1.41Search in Google Scholar

Kim Y., Taguchi N. (2015): Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Lg. J. 99(4): 656–677.10.1111/modl.12273Search in Google Scholar

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B. (1989): Praising and complimenting. In Oleksy W. (ed.), Contrastive pragmatics, 73–100. Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/pbns.3.08lewSearch in Google Scholar

Li Q. (2016): Variations in developmental patterns across pragmatic features. Studies in 2nd Lg. Learning and Teaching 6(4): 587–617.Search in Google Scholar

Li S. (2014): The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System 45: 103–116.10.1016/j.system.2014.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Liu J. (2006): Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Liu J. (2007): Development of a pragmatics test for Chinese EFL learners. Lg. Testing 24 (3): 391–415.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey A., Gass S.M. (2016): Second language research methodology and design (2nd ed.). Rutledge, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Flor A., Usó-Juan E. (2006): Learners’ use of request modifiers across two university ESP disciplines. Ibérica 12: 23–42.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumura S. (2001): Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization. Lg. Learning 51: 635–679.Search in Google Scholar

McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. (1989): Generalised linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6Search in Google Scholar

McCulloch Ch., Searle S.R. (2001): Generalised, linear, and mixed models. Wiley, New York.10.1002/9780470057339.vag009Search in Google Scholar

Ogiermann E., Saßenroth D. (2012): Statistics in contrastive pragmatics. In Ruiz de Zarobe L., Ruiz de Zarobe Y. (eds.), Speech acts and politeness across languages and cultures, 369–398. Peter Lang., Bern.Search in Google Scholar

R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.0) by R Core Team (2017). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

Rue Y.-J., Zhang Qiao G. (2008): Request strategies: A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/pbns.177Search in Google Scholar

Scarcella R.C. (1983): Discourse accent in second language performance. In Gass S., Selinker L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 306–326. Newbury House, Rowley, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Scarcella R.C. (1992): Interethnic conversation and second language acquisition: Discourse accent revisited. In Gass S., Selinker L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning, 109–137. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/lald.5.10scaSearch in Google Scholar

Schauer G. (2009): Interlanguage pragmatics development: The study abroad context. Continuum, London.Search in Google Scholar

Schenker Th. (2016): Syntactic complexity in a cross-cultural e-mail exchange. System 63, (December): 40–50.Search in Google Scholar

Szczepaniak-Kozak A. (2018): Interlanguage pragmatic competence: A longitudinal study of ‘pragmatic accent’ in learning EFL. Wydawnictwo UAM, Poznań.Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi N. (2007): Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 313–338.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.xSearch in Google Scholar

Taguchi N. (2008): Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Lg. learning 58 (1): 33–71.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.xSearch in Google Scholar

Taguchi N. (2010): Longitudinal studies in interlanguage pragmatics. In Trosborg A. (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics, vol. 7, 333–361. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.10.1515/9783110214444.2.333Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi N. (2011): Pragmatic development as a dynamic, complex process: General patterns and case histories. The Modern Lg. J. 95 (4): 605–627.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01246.xSearch in Google Scholar

Takahashi S. (2001): Input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Rose K.R., Kasper G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, 171–199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.014Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi S. (2015): The effects of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. System 48 (February): 48–61.10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Thomas J. (1995): Meaning in interaction. An introduction to pragmatics. Longman, London. 9Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo