Sustainability Aesthetics of Hybrid Environments: Creation and Perception by the Emerging Generation of Designers

Torreggiani, D., Dall’Ara, E., Tassinari, P. The urban nature of agriculture: Bidirectional trends between city and countryside. Cities, 2012, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.006 Search in Google Scholar

Hou, J. Hybrid landscapes: toward an inclusive ecological urbanism on Seattle’s Central Waterfront. In Proceedings of the ACSA 94th Annual Conference Proceedings, Getting Real: Design Ethos Now, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2006, vol. 30., pp. 1–6. Search in Google Scholar

Indriliūnaitė, R. Possibilities of self-provision of housing for the middle generation (born in 1970–1984) in Lithuania. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 2020, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 63–75. Search in Google Scholar

Šiupšinskas, M. Vasarnamio sublimatas: kolektyviniai sodai sovietmečiu. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis, 2018, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 233–243. Search in Google Scholar

Daukšienė, J., Jasaitis, J. Šiuolaikinių šeimos sodybų kūrimas kaimiškose gyvenvietėse. Kaimo raidos kryptys žinių visuomenėje: mokslo darbai, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 84–94. Search in Google Scholar

Daugelaite, A., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Aesthetics of sustainability and architecture: An overview. Architecture and Urban Planning, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 48–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0008 Search in Google Scholar

Seduikyte, L., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I., Povilaitienė, I., Fokaides, P. A., Lingė, D. Trends and interdisciplinarity integration in the development of the research in the fields of sustainable, healthy and digital buildings and cities. Buildings, 2023, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071764 Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, S. Aesthetics of sustainability: a transdisciplinary sensibility for transformative practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/00014 Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, S. Cultures of sustainability and the aesthetics of the pattern that connects. Futures, 2010, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1094–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.009 Search in Google Scholar

Ji, S., Lin, P. S. Aesthetics of sustainability: research on the design strategies for emotionally durable visual communication design. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 4649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084649 Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, G. Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballentine, 1972. 542 p. Search in Google Scholar

Dekay, M. Five levels of sustainable design aesthetics. Perceiving and appreciating developmental complexity. In: 28th International PLEA Conference on Sustainable Architecture + Urban Design: Opportunities, Limits and Needs-Towards an Environmentally Responsible Architecture proceeding, 2012, pp. 7–12. Search in Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1967. 128 p. Search in Google Scholar

Jasimuddin, S. M., Klein, J. H., Connell, C. The paradox of using tacit and explicit knowledge: strategies to face dilemmas. Management Decision, 2005, vol. 43. no. 1, pp. 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510572515 Search in Google Scholar

Wong, W. L. P., Radcliffe, D. F. The tacit nature of design knowledge. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2000, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698497 Search in Google Scholar

Groat, L. N., Wang, D. Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-004-0006-7 Search in Google Scholar

Lenzholzer, S., Duchhart, I., Koh, J. ‘Research through designing’ in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, vol. 113, pp. 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.003 Search in Google Scholar

Nijhuis, S., de Vries, J. Design as research in landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 2019, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 87–103. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.38.1-2.87 Search in Google Scholar

Kamičaitytė, J., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I., Mačikūnaitė, A., Marozaitė, G. Kultūrinė darnaus vystymosi dimensija kraštovaizdžio architektūros eksperimentiniuose projektuose. Kraštovaizdžio architektūra, 2023, vol. 2, pp. 8–28. Search in Google Scholar

Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, 1995. 284 p. Search in Google Scholar

Mahadevan, J. Change and learning, tacit knowledge management and virtual team innovativeness under BANI conditions: the role of leadership, organization and technology. In: Virtual Team Collaboration: A Guide for Individual Team Members, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2024, pp. 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44969-8_10 Search in Google Scholar

Mey, G. Qualitative methodology. In: International handbook of psychology learning and teaching, Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26248-8_22-2 Search in Google Scholar

Grodal, S., Anteby, M., Holm, A. L. Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Academy of Management Review, 2021, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 591–612. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0482 Search in Google Scholar