[
1. Lynch, K. The Image of the City. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 1960. 208 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Ewing, R., Cervero, R. Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the transportation research board, Vol. 1780, issue 1, 2001. pp. 87–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/1780-1010.3141/1780-10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. McNally, M.G., Ryan, S. Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1400, 1992, pp. 67−77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Crane, R., Crepeau, R. Does neighbourhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and environment, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 1998, pp. 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-710.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Pickrell, D. Transportation and Land Use. In Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy (J.A.Gomez-Ibanez, W.B.Tye and C.Winston eds.), Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1999, pp. 403−435.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Boarnet, M. G., Crane, R. Travel by design: the influence of urban form on travel. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. 224 p.10.1093/oso/9780195123951.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Frank, L., Pivo, G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1466, 1994, pp. 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90012-410.1016/0278-2391(94)90012-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Levinson D. M., Kumar A. Density and the journey to work. Spring, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 147−172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2257.0005410.1111/1468-2257.00054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Manaugh, K., Miranda-Moreno, L., El-Geneidy. A. The effect of neighbourhood characteristics, accessibility, home–work location, and demographics on commuting distances. Transportation, Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9275-z10.1007/s11116-010-9275-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Song, Y., Knaap, G. Quantitative classification of neighbourhoods: The neighbourhoods of new single-family homes in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480060107264010.1080/13574800601072640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Southworth, M., Owens, P. The evolving metropolis: Studies of Community, Neighborhood, and Street Form at the Urban Edge Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 59, Issue 3, 2007, pp. 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436930897588010.1080/01944369308975880
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Wheeler, S. The evolution of urban form in Portland and Toronto: Implications for sustainability planning. Local Environment: the international journal of justice and sustainability, Vol. 8, Issue 3, 2003, pp. 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983030665610.1080/13549830306656
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y. A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 506–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.00510.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Mokhtarian, P.L., Cao, X. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: A Focus on Methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, Issue 3, 2008, pp. 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.00610.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., Handy, S. L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 359–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164080253919510.1080/01441640802539195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Bohte, W., Maat, K., van Wee, B. Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: A review of theories and empirical research. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 325–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164090280844110.1080/01441640902808441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Song, Y., Knaap, G. Quantitative classification of neighbourhoods: The neighbourhoods of new single-family homes in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480060107264010.1080/13574800601072640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Manaugh, K., Miranda-Moreno, L., El-Geneidy. A. The effect of neighbourhood characteristics, accessibility, home–work location, and demographics on commuting distances. Transportation, Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9275-z10.1007/s11116-010-9275-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P., Laidet, L. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 125–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101795982556510.1023/A:1017959825565
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Crane, R., Crepeau, R. Does neighbourhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 1998, pp. 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-710.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Bagley, M., Mokhtarian, P. The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach. The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, Issue 2, 2002, pp. 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168020008310.1007/s001680200083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Cao, X., Handy, S., Mokhtarian, P. The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-7027-210.1007/s11116-005-7027-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Boarnet, M. G., Sarmiento, S. Can Land use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land use Characteristics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, Issue 7, 1998, pp. 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/004209898453810.1080/0042098984538
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Boarnet, M. G., Greenwald, M., McMillan, T. E. Walking, Urban Design, and Health: Toward a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, Issue 3, 2008, pp. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0731107310.1177/0739456X07311073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Dill, J., Voros, K. Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand: Initial Survey Findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region. Transportation Research Record 2031, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, 2007. pp. 9−17.10.3141/2031-02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Krizek, K. J., Johnson, P. J. Proximity to Trails and Retail: Effects on Urban Cycling and Walking. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 1. 2006, pp. 33−42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436060897672210.1080/01944360608976722
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., Che, D. Growing Cooler: Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute, 2008. 176 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Zhao, P. Car use, commuting and urban form in a rapidly growing city: evidence from Beijing. Transp. Plan. Technol., Vol. 34, Issue 6, 2011, pp. 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2011.60004910.1080/03081060.2011.600049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Wang, D., Chai, Y., Li, F. Built environment diversities and activity–travel behaviour variations in Beijing, China. Journal of Transp. Geogr. Vol. 19, Issue 6, 2011, pp. 1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.00810.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Ma, J., Liu, Z., Chai, Y. The impact of urban form on CO2 emission from work and non-work trips: the case of Beijing, China. Habitat Int., Vol. 47, 2015, pp. 1–10.10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Zhao, Y., Chai, Y., Residents’ activity-travel behavior variation by communities in Beijing, China. Chinese Geogr. Sci., Vol. 23, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0616-710.1007/s11769-013-0616-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Pakistan Population Census. Bureau of Statistic Govt. of Punjab 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Turner, D. W. Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. 2010 [cited 10.08.2019]. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss3/19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Bates, T. H. A Linear Regression Analysis of Ocean Tramp Rates, Transpn. Res., Vol. 3, 1969, pp. 377−395.10.1016/S0041-1647(69)80021-3
]Search in Google Scholar