[
1. Borojevic Owens BM, Phebus JJ. An evidence-based review of dental matrix systems. General dentistry.2015, pp 64-70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Fazekas Á: Megtartó fogászat és endodoncia,Semmelweis Ed.Budapest. 2006, pp 10-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Marlynda A.A Historical Review of Dental Matrices. Malaysian Dental Journal 2011; 33(2): 1-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kubo S, Kawasaki A, Hayashi Y. Factors associated with the longevity of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater J. 2011; 30(3):374-383.10.4012/dmj.2010-19121597206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Saber MH, Loomans BA, El Zohairy A, Dörfer CE, El-Badrawy W. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2010; 35(1):37-43.10.2341/09-037L20166409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Owens BM, Phebus JG. An evidence-based review of dental matrix systems. Gen Dent. 2016; 64(5):64-70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Shaalan OO.Evaluation of Matrix Band Systems for Posterior Proximal Restorations among Egyptian Dentists: A Cross-Sectional SurveyActa Stomatol Croat. 2020; 54(4): 392–400.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW. Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro. Operative Dentistry. 2006; 31(6):688-693.10.2341/05-13317153978
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Kou Qiang HX, Za Zhi YX.A clinical study of Palodent posterior teeth matrix system. West China Journal of Stomatology. 2009; 27(1):44-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Sadaf DE, Ahmad MZ, Gaikwad RN, Arjumand B. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29(4):459-464.10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_26_1730127197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, Dörfer CE. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 2011; 39(5):386-90.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.00121414384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. De la Peña VA, García RP, García RP. Sectional matrix: Step-by-step directions for their clinical use. Br dent J. 2016; 220(1):11-4.10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.1826768458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Almushayti M, Arjumand B. Operators’ Ease and Satisfaction in Restoring Class II Cavities With Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix System at Qassim University Dental Clinics. Cureus.2022; 14(1):e20957.10.7759/cureus.20957873079735004091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Peumans M, Venuti P, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Effective Protocol for Daily High-quality Direct Posterior Composite Restorations. The Interdental Anatomy of the Class-2 Composite Restoration. J Adhes Dent. 2021; 23(1):21-34.
]Search in Google Scholar
