This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tarraf NE, Ali DM. Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2018;24(4):376–85.TarrafNEAliDM.Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Semin Orthod2018;24(4):376–85.Search in Google Scholar
Dong T, Wang X, Xia L, Yuan L, Ye N, Fang B. Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:1–8.DongTWangXXiaLYuanLYeNFangB.Accuracy of different tooth surfaces on 3D printed dental models: orthodontic perspective. BMC Oral Health2020;20:1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Panayi N, Antonopoulos G, Tsolakis AI. Three-dimensional printing technology in orthodontics for dental models: a systematic review. Children 2022;9(8):1–15.TsolakisIAGizaniSPanayiNAntonopoulosGTsolakisAI.Three-dimensional printing technology in orthodontics for dental models: a systematic review. Children2022;9(8):1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P, Jo Y. Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2017;151(4):812–15.KravitzNDGrauerDSchumacherPJoY.Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2017;151(4):812–15.Search in Google Scholar
Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219(11):521–9.DawoodAMartiBMSauret-JacksonVDarwoodA.3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J2015;219(11):521–9.Search in Google Scholar
Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod 2014;48(6):337–47.KravitzNDGrothCJonesPEGrahamJWRedmondWR.Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod2014;48(6):337–47.Search in Google Scholar
Papaspyridakos P, Chen Y, Alshawaf B, Kang K, Finkelman M, Chronopoulos V., et al. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124(5):589–93.PapaspyridakosPChenYAlshawafBKangKFinkelmanMChronopoulosV.Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans. J Prosthet Dent2020;124(5):589–93.Search in Google Scholar
Sachdev S, Tantidhnazet S, Saengfai NN. Accuracy of tooth movement with in-house clear aligners. J World Fed Orthod 2021;10(4):177–82.SachdevSTantidhnazetSSaengfaiNN.Accuracy of tooth movement with in-house clear aligners. J World Fed Orthod2021;10(4):177–82.Search in Google Scholar
Nucera R, Dolci C, Bellocchio AM, Costa S, Barbera S, Rustico L, et al. Effects of composite attachments on orthodontic clear aligners therapy: a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 2022;15(2):533.NuceraRDolciCBellocchioAMCostaSBarberaSRusticoLEffects of composite attachments on orthodontic clear aligners therapy: a systematic review. Materials (Basel)2022;15(2):533.Search in Google Scholar
Dasy H, Dasy A, Asatrian G, Rózsa N, Lee H-F, Kwak JH. Effects of variable attachment shapes and aligner material on aligner retention. Angle Orthod 2015;85(6):934–40.DasyHDasyAAsatrianGRózsaNLeeH-FKwakJH.Effects of variable attachment shapes and aligner material on aligner retention. Angle Orthod2015;85(6):934–40.Search in Google Scholar
Thakkar D, Benattia A, Bichu YM, Zou B, Aristizabal JF, Fadia D, et al. Seamless workflows for in-house aligner fabrication. Semin Orthod 2023;29(1):17–24.ThakkarDBenattiaABichuYMZouBAristizabalJFFadiaDSeamless workflows for in-house aligner fabrication. Semin Orthod2023;29(1):17–24.Search in Google Scholar
Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater 2020;5(1): 110–5.QuanHZhangTXuHLuoSNieJZhuX.Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater2020;5(1):110–5.Search in Google Scholar
Cousley RRJ. Introducing 3D printing in your orthodontic practice. J Orthod 2020;47(3):265–72.CousleyRRJ.Introducing 3D printing in your orthodontic practice. J Orthod2020;47(3):265–72.Search in Google Scholar
Wei X, Bhardwaj A, Shih C, Zeng L, Tai B, Pei Z. Experimental investigation of Stratasys J750 PolyJet printer: Effects of orientation and layer thickness on mechanical properties. In: ASME 2019 14th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2019 Jun 10-14; Erie, Pennsylvania, USA. New York (NY): American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2019;58745:V001T01A021.WeiXBhardwajAShihCZengLTaiBPeiZ.Experimental investigation of Stratasys J750 PolyJet printer: Effects of orientation and layer thickness on mechanical properties. In: ASME 2019 14th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2019 Jun 10-14; Erie, Pennsylvania, USA. New York (NY): American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)2019;58745:V001T01A021.Search in Google Scholar
Tongkitcharoen N, Manopattanakul S, Boonpratham S, Santiwong P, Viwattanatipa N. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types. Clin Investig Orthodon 2023;82(4):177-93.TongkitcharoenNManopattanakulSBoonprathamSSantiwongPViwattanatipaN.Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types. Clin Investig Orthodon2023;82(4):177-93.Search in Google Scholar
Chanyawatana N, Pisitanusorn A, Angkasith P. Accuracy of LCD printed hollow models with differences in thickness and the presence of grid. J Int Dental Med Res 2021;14:970–76.ChanyawatanaNPisitanusornAAngkasithP.Accuracy of LCD printed hollow models with differences in thickness and the presence of grid. J Int Dental Med Res2021;14:970–76.Search in Google Scholar
Rungrojwittayakul O, Kan JY, Shiozaki K, Swamidass RS, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, et al. Accuracy of 3D printed models created by two technologies of printers with different designs of model base. J Prosthodont 2020;29(2):124–8.RungrojwittayakulOKanJYShiozakiKSwamidassRSGoodacreBJGoodacreCJAccuracy of 3D printed models created by two technologies of printers with different designs of model base. J Prosthodont2020;29(2):124–8.Search in Google Scholar
Revilla-León M, Piedra-Cascón W, Aragoneses R, Sadeghpour M, Barmak BA, Zandinejad A, et al. Influence of base design on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2023;129(1):166–73.Revilla-LeónMPiedra-CascónWAragonesesRSadeghpourMBarmakBAZandinejadAInfluence of base design on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent2023;129(1):166–73.Search in Google Scholar
Kenning KB, Risinger DC, English JD, Cozad BE, Harris LM, Ontiveros JC, et al. Evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances taken from 3D printed models with varied shell thicknesses: an in vitro study. Int Orthod 2021;19(1): 137–46.KenningKBRisingerDCEnglishJDCozadBEHarrisLMOntiverosJCEvaluation of the dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances taken from 3D printed models with varied shell thicknesses: an in vitro study. Int Orthod2021;19(1):137–46.Search in Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (truness and precision) of measurement methods and results Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:2023en)International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (truness and precision) of measurement methods and results Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:2023en)Search in Google Scholar
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109(2):121–8.EnderAMehlA.Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent2013;109(2):121–8.Search in Google Scholar
Tsolakis IA, Lyros I, Christopoulou I, Tsolakis AI, Papadopoulos MA. Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2024;116(1):7–14.TsolakisIALyrosIChristopoulouITsolakisAIPapadopoulosMA.Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2024;116(1):7–14.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang ZC, Li PL, Chu FT, Shen G. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop 2019;80(4):194–204.ZhangZCLiPLChuFTShenG.Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop2019;80(4):194–204.Search in Google Scholar
Jang W, Kook G-S, Kang J-H, Kim Y, Yun Y, Lee S-K, et al. Effect of washing condition on the fracture strength, and the degree of conversion of 3D printing resin. Appl Sci 2021;11(24):11676.JangWKookG-SKangJ-HKimYYunYLeeS-KEffect of washing condition on the fracture strength, and the degree of conversion of 3D printing resin. Appl Sci2021;11(24):11676.Search in Google Scholar
Brown GB, Currier GF, Kadioglu O, Kierl JP. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2018;154(5):733–9.BrownGBCurrierGFKadiogluOKierlJP.Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2018;154(5):733–9.Search in Google Scholar
Favero CS, English JD, Cozad BE, Wirthlin JO, Short MM, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2017;152(4):557–65.FaveroCSEnglishJDCozadBEWirthlinJOShortMMKasperFK.Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2017;152(4):557–65.Search in Google Scholar
Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, et al. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2019;156(2):283–9.LoflinWAEnglishJDBordersCHarrisLMMoonAHollandJNEffect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2019;156(2):283–9.Search in Google Scholar
FormlabsForm Wash Time Settings [Internet]. Available at: https://support.formlabs.com/s/article/Form-Wash-Time-Settings?language=en_USFormlabsForm Wash Time Settings [Internet]. Available at: https://support.formlabs.com/s/article/Form-Wash-Time-Settings?language=en_USSearch in Google Scholar
Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 2007;73(3):263–6.PhanXLingPH.Clinical limitations of invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor)2007;73(3):263–6.Search in Google Scholar
Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(10):1093–101.HirogakiYSohmuraTSatohHTakahashiJTakadaK.Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2001;20(10):1093–101.Search in Google Scholar
Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos Vilella O, Breuning H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2017;151(6):1178–87.CamardellaLTde Vasconcellos VilellaOBreuningH.Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2017;151(6):1178–87.Search in Google Scholar
Arnold C, Monsees D, Hey J, Schweyen R. Surface quality of 3D-printed models as a function of various printing parameters. Materials (Basel).2019;12(12):1970.ArnoldCMonseesDHeyJSchweyenR.Surface quality of 3D-printed models as a function of various printing parameters. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(12):1970.Search in Google Scholar
Mostafavi D, Methani MM, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Att W, Revilla-León M. Influence of polymerization postprocessing procedures on the accuracy of additively manufactured dental model material. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36(4):479.MostafaviDMethaniMMPiedra-CascónWZandinejadAAttWRevilla-LeónM.Influence of polymerization postprocessing procedures on the accuracy of additively manufactured dental model material. Int J Prosthodont2023;36(4):479.Search in Google Scholar
Yoo S-Y, Kim S-K, Heo S-J, Koak J-Y, Kim J-G. Dimensional accuracy of dental models for three-unit prostheses fabricated by various 3D printing technologies. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(6):1550.YooS-YKimS-KHeoS-JKoakJ-YKimJ-G.Dimensional accuracy of dental models for three-unit prostheses fabricated by various 3D printing technologies. Materials (Basel)2021;14(6):1550.Search in Google Scholar
Park J-M, Jeon J, Koak J-Y, Kim S-K, Heo S-J. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126(3):427–37.ParkJ-MJeonJKoakJ-YKimS-KHeoS-J.Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent2021;126(3):427–37.Search in Google Scholar
Lin LH, Granatelli J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Drake L, Smith D, Ahmed KE. A Proposed in vitro methodology for assessing the accuracy of three-dimensionally printed dental models and the impact of storage on dimensional stability. Appl Sci 2021;11(13):5994.LinLHGranatelliJAlifui-SegbayaFDrakeLSmithDAhmedKE.A Proposed in vitro methodology for assessing the accuracy of three-dimensionally printed dental models and the impact of storage on dimensional stability. Appl Sci2021;11(13):5994.Search in Google Scholar
Shin S-H, Lim J-H, Kang Y-J, Kim J-H, Shim J-S, Kim J-E. Evaluation of the 3D Printing accuracy of a dental model according to its internal structure and cross-arch plate design: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(23):5433.ShinS-HLimJ-HKangY-JKimJ-HShimJ-SKimJ-E.Evaluation of the 3D Printing accuracy of a dental model according to its internal structure and cross-arch plate design: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel)2020;13(23):5433.Search in Google Scholar