Case report: early class III correction using titanium dental implants and facemask therapy: a 24-year follow-up
, , , and
Jul 14, 2022
About this article
Published Online: Jul 14, 2022
Page range: 213 - 226
Received: Dec 01, 2021
Accepted: May 01, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2022-0024
Keywords
© 2022 Nida Khan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Cephalometric Measurements_
Immediate effects | Medium and long term observations | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measurement | Pre-treatment | RME completion | Full fixed appliance completion | FM completion | 2 Years post FM cessation | 11 Years post FM cessation | 24 Years post FM cessation |
SNA ( ) | 76 | 78 | 79 | 79.5 | 79 | 79 | 79 |
SNB (°) | 83 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 82 | 81.5 | 81 |
ANB (°) | -7 | -3 | -2 | -1.5 | -3 | -2.5 | -2 |
WITS (mm) | -13 | -7 | -8 | -8 | -9 | -5 | -5 |
NAPog (°) | -7 | -3 | -2.5 | -3 | -3 | -3.5 | -4 |
SN – PP (°) | 8 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 7.5 | 4 | 3 |
SN-GoGn(°) | 34 | 34 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
Co-A (mm) | 69 | 75 | 75 | 76 | 76 | 77 | 785 |
Co- Pog (mm) | 95 | 100 | 104 | 107 | 109 | 110 | 122 |
LAFH/TAFH (%) | 56 | 58 | 60 | 59 | 61 | 60 | 61 |
U1 – PP (°) | 113 | 111 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 106 | 110 |
U1 – NA (°) | 28 | 27 | 28 | 28 | 25 | 18 | 28 |
L1-MP (°) | 76 | 58 | 68.5 | 75 | 77 | 77 | 64 |
L1-NB (°) | 15 | 3 | 10.5 | 15 | 19 | 19 | 10 |
Interincisal angle (°) | 144 | 160 | 144 | 136 | 136 | 144 | 146 |
NLA (°) | 60 | 90 | 92 | 94 | 94 | 106 | 104 |
Ulip-E line (mm) | -9 | -4 | -4 | -7 | -8 | -9 | -12 |
Llip-E line (mm) | 3 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -3 | -3 |
OJ (mm) | -5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | -1.5 | -2 | 1 |
OB (mm) | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Clinical measurements_
Pre treatment | RME completion | Full fixed appliance completion | Retention (1 year prior FM completion) | Prior to re-treatment (11 years post FM) | After re-treatment | 24 Years Post treatment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overbite (%) | 60 | 40 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 40 | 20 |
Overjet (mm) | -5 | 4 | 2.5 | 2 | -1 | 3 | 1 |
Incisor relationship | III | II | I | I | III | I | I |
Molar relationship | III | II | I | I | I | I | I |
Intermolar width Mx (mm) | 45 | 47 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 42 |
Arch Depth Mx (mm) | 25 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 19 | 21 | 20 |
Intermolar width Md (mm) | 39 | 42 | 36 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 |
Arch Depth Md (mm) | 23 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 16 |