[Alkmin D.V., Perez-Patińo C., Barranco I., Parrilla I., Vázquez J.M., Martínez E.A., Rodríguez-Martínez H., Roca J. (2014). Boar sperm cryosurvival is better after exposure to seminal plasma from selected fractions than to those from entire ejaculate. Cryobiology, 69: 203–210.10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen X., Zhu H., Hu C., Hao H., Zhang J., Li K., Zha X., Qin T., Zhao K., Zhu H., Wang D. (2014). Identification of differentially expressed proteins in fresh and frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa by iTRAQ coupled 2D LC–MS/MS. Reproduction, 147: 321–330.10.1530/REP-13-0313]Search in Google Scholar
[Daigneault B.W., McNamara K.A., Purdy P.H., Krisher R.L., Knox R.V., Rodriguez-Zas S.L., Miller D.J. (2015). Enhanced fertility prediction of cryopreserved boar spermatozoa using novel sperm function assessment. Andrology, 3: 558–568.10.1111/andr.12035]Search in Google Scholar
[Daskalova D., Wysocki P., Gradinarska D., Hristova E., Kicheva-Ivanova M. (2014). Differences between seminal plasma proteins from boar semen with high and low cryotolerance of the spermatozoa. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie Bulgare des Sciences, 67: 1663–1668.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dziekońska A., Fraser L., Strzeżek J. (2009). Effect of different storage temperatures on themetabolic activity of spermatozoa following liquid storage of boar semen. J. Anim. Feed. Sci., 18: 638–649.10.22358/jafs/66438/2009]Search in Google Scholar
[Eriksson B., Vázquez J.M., Martinéz E., Roca J., Lucas X., Rodríguez-Martínez H. (2001). Effect of holding time during cooling and the type of package on plasma membrane integrity, motility and in vitro oocyte penetration ability of frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 55: 1593–1605.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00505-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser L., Parda A., Filipowicz K., Strzeżek J. (2010). Comparison of post-thaw DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa assessed with the neutral comet assay and Sperm-Sus Halomax test kit. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 45: e155–e160.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01537.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser L., Strzeżek J., Kordan W. (2014). Post-thaw sperm characteristics following long-term storage of boar semen in liquid nitrogen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 147: 119–127.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.04.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Garner D.L., Johnson L.A. (1995). Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol. Reprod., 53: 276–284.10.1095/biolreprod53.2.276]Search in Google Scholar
[Guimarães D.B., Barros T.B., van Tilburg M.F., Martins J.A.M., Moura A.A., Morenoc F.B., Monteiro-Moreira A.C., Moreirac R.A., Toniolli R. (2017). Sperm membrane proteins associated with the boar semen cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 183: 27–38.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernández M., Roca J., Calvete J.J., Sanz L., Muiño-Blanco T., Cebrián-Pérez J.A., Vázquez J.M., Martínez E.A. (2007). Cryosurvival and in vitro fertilizing capacity postthaw is imposed when boar spermatozoa are frozen in the presence of seminal plasma from good freezer boars. J. Androl., 28: 689–697.10.2164/jandrol.107.002725]Search in Google Scholar
[Holt W.V., Medrano A., Thurston L.M., Watson P.F. (2005). The significance of cooling rates and animal variability for boar sperm cryopreservation: insights from the cryomicroscope. Theriogenology, 63: 370–382.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonáková V., Tichá M. (2004). Boar seminal plasma proteins and their binding properties. A review. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 69: 461–475.10.1135/cccc20040461]Search in Google Scholar
[Knox R.V. (2015). The fertility of frozen boar sperm when used for artificial insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 50: 90–97.10.1111/rda.12552]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K. (2013). The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Archiv. Tierzucht., 56: 1052–1059.10.7482/0003-9438-56-106]Search in Google Scholar
[Laemmli U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head bacteriophage T4. Nature, 277: 680–685.10.1038/227680a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Li J., Barranco I., Tvarijonaviciute A., Molina M.F., Martínez E.A., Rodríguez-Martínez H., Parrilla I., Roca J. (2018). Seminal plasma antioxidants are directly involved in boar sperm cryotolerance. Theriogenology, 107: 27–35.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.035]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265–275.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Manjunath P., Bergeron A., Lefebvre J., Fan J. (2007). Seminal plasma proteins: functions and interaction with protective agents during semen preservation. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 65: 217–228.]Search in Google Scholar
[Metz K.W., Berger T., Clegg E.D. (1990). Adsorption of seminal plasma proteins by boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 34: 691–700.10.1016/0093-691X(90)90024-N]Search in Google Scholar
[Okazaki T., Abe S., Yoshida S., Shimada M. (2009). Seminal plasma damages sperm during cryopreservation, but its presence during thawing improves semen quality and conception rates in boars with poor post-thaw semen quality. Theriogenology, 71: 491–498.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez-Patiño C., Barranco I., Parrilla I., Valero M.L., Martínez E.A., Rodríguez-Martínez H., Roca J. (2016). Characterization of the porcine seminal plasma proteome comparing ejaculate portions. J. Proteomics, 142: 15–23.10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez-Patiño C., Parrilla I., Li J., Barranco I., Martínez E.A., Rodríguez-Martínez H., Roca J. (2019). The proteome of pig spermatozoa is remodeled during ejaculation. Mol. Cel. Proteomics, 18: 41–50.10.1074/mcp.RA118.000840]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez-Martínez H., Kvist U., Ernerudh J., Sanz L., Calvete J.J. (2011). Seminal plasma proteins: What role do they play? Am. J. Reprod. Immunol., 66 (Suppl. 1): 11–22.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01033.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Saravia F., Wallgren M., Johannisson A., Calvete J.J., Sanz L., Pena F.J., Roca J., Rodríguez-Martínez H. (2008). Exposure to the seminal plasma of different portions of the boar ejaculate modulates the survival of spermatozoa cryopreserved in MiniFlatPacks. Theriogenology, 71: 662–675.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.037]Search in Google Scholar
[Soler A.J., Esteso M.C., Fernandez-Santos M.R., Garde J.J. (2005). Characteristics of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) spermatozoa cryopreserved after storage at 5 degrees C in the epididymis for several days. Theriogenology, 64: 1503–1517.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.03.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Trzcińska M., Bryła M. (2015). Apoptotic-like changes of boar spermatozoa in freezing media supplemented with different antioxidants. Pol. J. Vet. Sci., 18: 473–480.10.1515/pjvs-2015-0062]Search in Google Scholar
[Vilagran I., Castillo J., Bonet S., Sancho S., Yeste M., Estanyol J.M., Oliva R. (2013). Acrosin-binding protein (ACRBP) and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) are good markers to predict boar sperm freezing capacity. Theriogenology, 80: 443–450.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Vilagran I., Yeste M., Sancho S., Castillo J., Oliva R., Bonet S. (2015). Comparative analysis of boar seminal plasma proteome from different freezability ejaculates and identification of Fibronectin 1 as sperm freezability marker. Andrology, 3: 345–356.10.1111/andr.12009]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasilewska K., Fraser L. (2017). Boar variability in sperm cryo-tolerance after cooling of semen in different long-term extenders at various temperatures. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 185: 161–173.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasilewska K., Filipowicz K., Kordan W., Fraser L. (2018 a). Supplementation of post-thaw semen with fractionated seminal plasma improves cryo-survival of boar spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 53 (Suppl.2): 208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasilewska K., Mogielnicka-Brzozowska M., Piątkowska E., Fraser L. (2018 b). Proteomic analysis of fractionated boar seminal plasma and its associations with semen freezability. Proc. Conference Animal Genetics and Genomics, Olsztyn, Poland, 2–4.07.2018, pp. 116–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeste M. (2016). Sperm cryopreservation update: cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology, 85: 47–64.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.047]Search in Google Scholar
[Yeste M., Rodríguez-Gil J.E., Bonet S. (2017). Artificial insemination with frozen-thawed boar sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 84: 802–813.10.1002/mrd.22840]Search in Google Scholar
[Zasiadczyk Ł., Fraser L., Kordan W., Wasilewska K. (2015). Individual and seasonal variations in the quality of fractionated boar ejaculates. Theriogenology, 83: 1287–1303.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.015]Search in Google Scholar