Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
Open Access
Nonlinear Differential Equations in Computer-Aided Modeling of Big Data Technology
Yinping Li
Yinping Li
,
Qing Cheng
Qing Cheng
and
Moaiad Ahmad Khder
Moaiad Ahmad Khder
| Jun 06, 2023
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jun 06, 2023
Page range:
319 - 330
Received:
Jan 11, 2022
Accepted:
Mar 12, 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.2.00013
Keywords
Nonlinear differential equation
,
Computer
,
big data
,
Unsteady aerodynamic force
,
Modeling
,
Wind tunnel test
© 2023 Yinping Li et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
In-phase/out-of-phase derivatives at different center angles of attack and different frequencies
Figure 2
The variation curve of the dimensionless time constant with the angle of attack
Figure 3
Identification results of parameters Cm,att (a) and Δ Cm (a)
Figure 4
Comparison results of 10° amplitude value between steady/unsteady model and experiment
Figure 5
Comparison result of 20° amplitude value between steady/unsteady model and experiment
Figure 6
Unsteady aerodynamic dynamic surface
Figure 7
Linear/nonlinear unsteady model and steady model and test 20° amplitude value comparison results