Published Online: Apr 24, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0942
Keywords
© 2025 Z. Sabir, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Wen Wang
URL:
DOI:
Upon review, this paper exhibits significant flaws in originality, methodological rigor, and academic integrity, failing to meet our journal's publication standards. Specifically, it lacks substantial theoretical contributions, provides insufficient model validation, and suffers from poor language and structure. We recommend retraction based on the following three key issues. Lack of Originality and Theoretical Depth The paper constructs a differential equation-based model for supply chain risk management, but the approach lacks originality and fails to propose novel theories or significant improvements to existing methods. The content primarily applies well-known concepts without deep analysis or unique insights. Insufficient Mathematical Rigor and Model Validation The mathematical derivations and model validations in the paper are inadequate. Key assumptions (e.g., market demand distribution) lack justification, and simulation results are not compared with real-world data, undermining the credibility of the conclusions. Language and Structural Issues Compromising Readability The paper suffers from unclear language, inconsistent logic, and non-standard use of formulas/terminology. The structure is disorganized, with sections like numerical simulation lacking clear objectives, hindering comprehension of the research contributions
Retraction DOI:
Cartagena, April 21, 2025
Editor-in-Chief of