The bayesian network analysis model of the diversity culture path of the garden talents

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

The conditional probability of the “teaching” path node

Satisfaction	The probability of “teaching” path node condition/%
	[5,6)	[6,7)	[7,8)	[8,9)
Worse	96	4	0	0
General	97	3	0	0
Good	92	8	0	0
Excellence	97	3	0	0

The landscape talent diversity culture path evaluation index system

Primary index	Secondary index	Tertiary index
Teaching(A)	Curriculum reconstruction(A1)	The degree of docking of the course and the industry(A11)
		The rationality of the curriculum structure(A12)
		The richness of the course resources(A13)
	Teaching model innovation(A2)	Diversity of teaching methods(A21)
		The informationization of teaching technology(A22)
		The participation of teaching activities(A23)
	Training and integration of production(A3)	The quantity and quality of cooperative enterprises(A31)
		Practice and innovation of training programs(A32)
		Students’ satisfaction with training(A33)
Instruction(B)	Environmental shaping(B1)	Optimization of the environment(B11)
		The frequency of students’ participation in cultural activities(B12)
		Environmental effect(B13)
	The elements of thinking are moist(B2)	The coverage of the government course(B21)
		The harmony of the education and the professional education(B22)
		Students’ improvement of political literacy(B23)
	Leader of party members(B3)	Demonstration of party members pioneer(B31)
		The effect of teaching and education(B32)
		Job creation(B33)

Confusion matrix

True value	Predictive value
	Categories I	Categories II
Categories I	TP	FN
Categories II	FP	TN

Satisfaction of Beels network evaluation results

Satisfaction	Accuracy	Precision	Recall	Specificity	False positive rate	F1
Very satisfied	0.813	0.532	0.277	0.964	0.042	0.343
Satisfaction		0.946	0.982	0.516	0.468	0.953
General		0.935	0.495	0.936	0.002	0.633
Discontent		1	1	1	0	1
Very dissatisfied		1	0.916	1	0	0.954

The probability of path satisfaction of garden talent diversity culture

Satisfaction	[5,6)	[6,7)	[7,8)	[8,9)
Probability	0.06	0.02	0.02	0.92

The conditional probability of the “Instruction” path node

Satisfaction	“Teaching”	The probability of “teaching” path node condition/%
		[5,6)	[6,7)	[7,8)	[8,9)
Worse	Worse	0	97	3	0
General	General	0	41	59	0
Good	Worse	0	50	45	5
Excellence	General	0	0	78	22
Excellence	Good	0	0	0	100