Modeling of Chronic Disease Prevention and Nutritional Intervention for the Elderly Based on Big Data Analysis

Figure 1.

Table 2.

The accuracy of the evaluation of chronic diseases of chronic diseases

Test dimension	Test topic	Sample rate/%	Weighted rate/%	95%CI
Reasonable diet	Q1	66.98	66.99	66.35-67.68
Mental health	Q2	75.12	75.14	74.26-75.49
Slow disease management	Q3	42.56	42.58	41.22-42.36
Tobacco control	Q4	38.95	39.95	37.59-38.79
Tumor control	Q5	39.98	39.96	39.25-40.68
Weight management	Q6	48.75	48.76	47.89-48.95
Nutrition and health	Q7	29.44	29.46	28.56-29.87
Sports and health	Q8	41.25	41.23	39.79-41.22
Overweight and health	Q9	52.36	52.41	51.23-52.65

The ability of self-protection before and after intervention, the hope level

Group	N	ESCA		Herth
		Preintervention	After intervention	Preintervention	After intervention
Intervention group	60	89.94±5.13	137.16±11.02①②	18.86±1.72	31.08±2.82①②
Control group	60	90.12±4.85	129.85±12.46①	19.18±1.85	25.35±3.37①

Patient intervention before and after nutrition

Group	N	Time	ALB(g/L)	BMI(kg/m2)	PA(mg/L)	Hb(g/L)
Intervention group	60	preintervention	33.58±2.56	18.27±1.21	259.78±49.15	84.17±6.14
		After intervention	40.04±2.15①②	24.78±1.25①②	316.75±18.79①②	115.44±10.38①②
Control group	60	preintervention	34.18±2.45	17.94±1.22	260.16±48.87	83.87±6.38
		After intervention	35.89±3.1	20.05±0.68	292.24±15.98	104.55±11.27①

Logistic regression analysis of chronic disease prevention in the elderly

Variable		B	S.E.	T	P	OR	95%CI
Constant		-4.959	0.587	-8.412	<0.001	0.006	0.002-0.024
Urban and rural	City	0.462	0.053	8.445	<0.001	1.583	1.425-1.768
	Countryside					1.000
Region	East	0.422	0.054	7.286	<0.001	1.523	1.356-1.705
	Middle	-0.146	0.072	-2.097		0.867	0.756-0.993
	West					1.000
Gender	Man	-0.043	0.048	-0.805		0.965	0.875-1.056
	Female					1.000
Age		0.018	0.008	1.978		1.016	1.000-1.034
Cultural degree	Illiterate					1.000
	Primary school	0.613	0.084	7.156	<0.001	1.845	1.556-2.184
	Junior high school	1.016	0.085	11.815	<0.001	2.767	2.336-3.281
	High school /high office	1.356	0.098	14.336	<0.001	3.875	3.218-4.659
	College /undergraduate /above	1.623	0.116	13.758	<0.001	5.058	4.016-6.369
Slow condition	Undiseased					1.000
	Sickness	0.075	0.054	1.405	0.165	1.081	0.975-1.189
Self-assessment health	Good	0.426	0.215	1.994	0.048	1.536	1.008-2.336
	Better	0.684	0.210	3.256	0.001	1.975	1.316-2.968
	General	0.495	0.208	2.395	0.015	1.638	1.095-2.458
	Difference	0.423	0.222	1.942	0.056	1.515	0.996-2.357
	Very bad					1.000

Two groups of patients were compared before and after the intervention

Group	N	Time	Face	Avoidance	Yield
Intervention group	60	preintervention	13.12±1.55	22.21±1.05	14.92±1.76
		After intervention	27.15±1.74①②	13.55±1.28①②	9.75±0.76①②
Control group	60	preintervention	12.91±1.62	21.85±1.12	15.13±1.67
		After intervention	22.66±1.24①	17.25±1.82①①	12.02±1.04①①

The GCQ and KKKDQ score was compared

Group	N	ESCA		Herth
		Preintervention	After intervention	Preintervention	After intervention
Intervention group	60	49.15±4.66	87.15±6.05①②	68.16±5.02	115.08±10.12①②
Control group	60	47.12±4.82	79.87±7.46①	67.78±4.85	108.35±13.37①

Analysis of the prevention and health of chronic diseases in the elderly

Survey content		Sample rate/%	Weighted rate/%	95%CI	X2 value	P value
Slow condition	Undiseased	10.39	10.40	9.77-10.89	3.648	0.058
	Sickness	11.26	11.28	10.67-11.69
Slow number	One species	10.65	10.67	9.97-11.46	11.356	0.004
	Two kinds	13.62	13.65	11.75-15.98
	Greater than equal to 3	12.93	12.89	9.95-16.85
Period of slow disease	<One year	10.65	10.67	9.22-12.26	24.168	<0.001
	1-5 years	10.11	10.15	9.14-11.29
	5-10 years	10.74	10.75	9.48-12.29
	>Ten years	14.79	14.82	13.17-16.89
Self-assessment health	Good	10.09	10.11	9.17-11.19	78.816	<0.001
	Better	13.64	13.68	12.77-14.89
	General	10.21	10.22	9.77-10.89
	Difference	8.56	8.59	7.64-10.19
	Very bad	4.54	4.49	3.09-6.56

The two groups were compared to the practice of medical behavior

Group	N	Follow the doctor	As a doctor	Poor care	The compliance rate is at (%)
Intervention group	60	45	13	2	96.67
Control group	60	25	20	15	75