Open Access

Mediating Effects of Learning Environment Adaptation and Self-Efficacy on College Students’ Self-Directed Learning

 and   
Feb 27, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1.

Mediation Effect Model
Mediation Effect Model

Figure 2.

Mediation Effect Model
Mediation Effect Model

Figure 3.

Mediation Effect Model
Mediation Effect Model

Figure 4.

Mediation Effect Model M1-2
Mediation Effect Model M1-2

Figure 5.

Mediation Effect Model M1-3
Mediation Effect Model M1-3

Figure 6.

Mediation Effect Model M1-4
Mediation Effect Model M1-4

Figure 7.

Mediation effect of model M2-2
Mediation effect of model M2-2

X X is the independent variable of the mediation model (Self concept).
Y Y is the dependent variable of the mediation model (Self directed learning).
M1 M1 is the mediator variable in the mediation model (Self-efficacy).
M2 M2 is the mediator variable in the mediation model (Learning environment adaptation).
a1 The effect coefficient of the independent variable X on the mediating variable M1.
a2 The effect coefficient of the independent variable X on the mediating variable M2.
b1 The effect coefficient of the mediator variable M1 on the dependent variable Y.
b2 The effect coefficient of the mediator variable M2 on the dependent variable Y.
c2 The direct effect of independent variable X on dependent variable Y.
c1 The indirect effect of independent variable X on dependent variable Y
d The effect coefficient of the mediator variable M1 on mediating variable M2.
ε1,ε2,ε3,ε4 The error terms for equations 1, 2, 3and4.
N Statistical sample size.
r Pearson correlation coefficient.
χmodel2$$\chi _{model}^2$$ The chi square value of the model
dfmodel The degrees of freedom of the model
χbaseline2$$\chi _{baseline}^2$$ The chi square value of the benchmark model
dfbaseline The degrees of freedom of the benchmark model
Sobserved Observation covariance matrix
Sfitted Covariance matrix for model fitting
β Standardized coefficients.
t The significance level of the difference between sample results and population parameters.
R2 The goodness of fit of the model.
F The significance of the impact of variables on response variables.

Demographic characteristics (N=325)

Characteristics N %
Gender Male 160 49.23%
Female 165 50.77%
Education undergraduate 242 74.46%
postgraduate 83 25.54%
Top 10% 22 6.77%
11%~25% 28 8.62%
Scores 26%~50% 120 36.92%
51%~75% 112 34.46%
After 76% 43 13.23%
Marital status Married 6 1.85%
Unmarried 319 98.15%
Natural Sciences 161 49.54%
College Social Sciences 112 34.46%
Art 52 16.00%

The correlation between variables (N=325)

variables X¯±s$${\bar X_{ \pm s}}$$ self-concept self-directed learning self-efficacy
self-concept 52.38±9.518 1
self-directed learning 48.63±16.278 0.564** 1
self-efficacy 76.15±19.241 0.614** 0.685** 1
learning environment adaptation 53.57±6.35 0.449** 0.304** 0.476**

The mediating effect of AQ between Student Achievement and Engagement

Self directed learning self-efficacy learning environment adaptation Self directed learning
Predictors β t β t β t
Self concept 0.572 8.54*** 0.483 4.21*** 0.268 7.92*** 0.476 5.78***
self-efficacy 0.065 8.36*** 0.312 9.11***
learning environment adaptation 0.065 5.47***
R2 0.19 0.21 0.14 0.25
F 80.12*** 72.45*** 70.30*** 75.88***
Language:
English