Application and Performance Evaluation of Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys in Building Vibration Isolation Systems

[1] Hoult, R. D., & De Almeida, J. P. (2022). Residual displacements of reinforced concrete walls detailed with conventional steel and shape memory alloy rebars. Engineering structures(Apr.1), 256. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Dezfuli, Hedayati, F., Alam, & Shahria, M. (2018). Smart lead rubber beari7ngs equipped with ferrous shape memory alloy wires for seismically isolating highway bridges. Journal of earthquake engineering. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Yurdakul, O. A. O. (2018). Retrofit of non-seismically designed beam-column joints by post-tensioned superelastic shape memory alloy bars. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 16(11). Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ahmadinejad, M., Jafarisirizi, A., & Rahgozar, R. (2020). Effects of shape memory alloys on response of steel structural buildings within near field earthquakes zone. Civil Engineering Journal, 6(7), 1314-1327. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bin, H., Yuemin, L., Junming, C., & Yang, S. (2018). Dynamic response analysis of a frame structure with superelastic nitinol sma helical spring braces for vibration reduction. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 31(6), 04018096-. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hwang, S. H., & Lignos, D. G. (2018). Earthquake-induced collapse risk and loss assessment of steel concentrically braced frames. Key Engineering Materials, 763, 90-97. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Deogekar, P. S., & Andrawes, B. (2018). Probabilistic seismic demand models for shape memory alloy retrofitted rc bridge columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 23(8), 4018050.1-4018050.12. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Tian, L., Gao, G., Qiu, C., & Rong, K. (2019). Effect of hysteresis properties of shape memory alloy-tuned mass damper on seismic control of power transmission tower. Advances in Structural Engineering, 22(4), 1007-1017. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wang, B., & Zhu, S. (2022). Cyclic behavior of iron-based shape memory alloy bars for high-performance seismic devices. Engineering structures(Feb.1 Pt.2), 252. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Qiu, C., Cheng, L., & Du, X. (2022). Performance-based plastic design of multi-story hybrid braced frames with buckling-restrained braces and shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hameed, J., & Abbas, A. L. (2019). Seismic performance of two story steel building using shape memory alloys (smas) bars. Civil Engineering Journal, 5(7), 1465-1476. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jabbari, H., Vahdani, R., Gerami, M., & Naderpour, H. (2019). Seismic performance of steel moment frames containing concentric bracing equipped with shape memory alloys. The Open Civil Engineering Journal (1). Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pengzhen, L., Xiaoli, Z., Feng, T., & Hua, S. (2017). Fundamentals of shape memory alloy–rubber bearing seismic design and assessment. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(8), 04017081. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Abraik, E., & Asif, I. (2023). A comparison of utilization design ratios of self-centering shape memory alloy with different brace configurations. Engineering Structures, 281, 115768-. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rele, R. R., Balmukund, R., Mitoulis, S. A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Rocking isolation of bridge pier using shape memory alloy. Bridge Structures, 16(2-3), 85-103. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wang, B. Z. S. (2018). Seismic behavior of self-centering reinforced concrete wall enabled by superelastic shape memory alloy bars. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 16(1). Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wanniarachchi, S., Prabatha, T., Karunathilake, H., Li, S., Alam, M. S., & Hewage, K. (2022). Life cycle thinking-based decision making for bridges under seismic conditions. Ⅱ: a case study on bridges with superelastic sma rc piers. Journal of Bridge Engineering(6), 27. Search in Google Scholar