Complications Following Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer – Modified Intersphincteric Resections vs Non-Sphincter Saving Technique

1. Lirici MM, Hüscher CGS. Techniques and technology evolution of rectal cancer surgery: a history of more than a hundred years. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 2016;25:226–233.10.1080/13645706.2016.1198381Search in Google Scholar

2. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER. The Lancet. 1986;327:1479–1482.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2Search in Google Scholar

3. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–1378.10.1002/bjs.1800810944Search in Google Scholar

4. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–1378.10.1002/bjs.1800810944Search in Google Scholar

5. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1858–1865; discussion 1865-1867.10.1007/s10350-005-0134-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Laurent C, Paumet T, Leblanc F, et al. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:35–41; discussion 42-43.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02528.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Chen H, Ma B, Gao P, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15:229.10.1186/s12957-017-1304-3Search in Google Scholar

8. Chi P, Huang S-H, Lin H-M, et al. Laparoscopic Transabdominal Approach Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Surgical Feasibility and Intermediate-Term Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:944–951.10.1245/s10434-014-4085-8Search in Google Scholar

9. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RDH, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet. 1993;341:457–460.10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-WSearch in Google Scholar

10. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, et al. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg. 1998;133:894–899.10.1001/archsurg.133.8.8949711965Search in Google Scholar

11. Butiurca V-O, Molnar C, Constantin C, et al. Long Term Results of Modified Intersphincteric Resections for Low Rectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience. Medicina. 2019;55:764.10.3390/medicina55120764Search in Google Scholar

12. Corman ML. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon: by W. Ernest Miles, 1869-1947. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23:202–205.Search in Google Scholar

13. Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, et al. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:560–567.10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827c4a8cSearch in Google Scholar

14. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:9–16; discussion 16-17.10.1007/BF02237236Search in Google Scholar

15. Molnar C. Molnar C and Butiurca VO. Muco-Submucosal Necrosis-Early Novel Complication following Intersphincteric Resections. Austin J Pathol Lab Med. 2017; 4(1): 1017. Austin J Pathol Lab Med [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Feb 18];4. Available from: http://austinpublishinggroup.com/pathology/fulltext/pathology-v4-id1017.php.Search in Google Scholar

16. Westerduin E, Musters GD, van Geloven AAW, et al. Low Hartmann’s procedure or intersphincteric proctectomy for distal rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:1583–1589.10.1007/s00384-017-2886-5Search in Google Scholar

17. Khan NA, Quan H, Bugar JM, et al. Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:177–180.10.1007/s11606-006-0254-1Search in Google Scholar

18. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:916–920.10.1007/BF02052598Search in Google Scholar

19. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Oncologic Results. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250:54–61.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511Search in Google Scholar

20. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2013;14:210–218.10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0Search in Google Scholar

21. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:413–424.10.1245/ASO.2006.05.04516450220Search in Google Scholar

22. Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Czerwińska A, et al. A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16:218.10.1186/s12957-018-1513-4622308530404633Search in Google Scholar

23. Yamada K, Saiki Y, Takano S, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan. Surg Today. 2019;49:275–285.10.1007/s00595-018-1754-430604217Search in Google Scholar

24. Sprenger T, Beißbarth T, Sauer R, et al. Long-term prognostic impact of surgical complications in the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1510–1518.10.1002/bjs.1087729846017Search in Google Scholar

25. Hawkins AT, Albutt K, Wise PE, et al. Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer in the Twenty-First Century: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:1477–1487.10.1007/s11605-018-3750-929663303Search in Google Scholar

26. Tooley JE, Sceats LA, Bohl DD, et al. Frequency and timing of short-term complications following abdominoperineal resection. J Surg Res. 2018;231:69–76.10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.00930278971Search in Google Scholar

27. Christian CK, Kwaan MR, Betensky RA, et al. Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:43–48.10.1007/s10350-004-0855-x15690656Search in Google Scholar

28. Bailey JG, Davis PJB, Levy AR, et al. The impact of adverse events on health care costs for older adults undergoing nonelective abdominal surgery. Can J Surg. 2016;59:172–179.10.1503/cjs.013915498286226999476Search in Google Scholar

29. Goto S, Hasegawa S, Hata H, et al. Differences in surgical site infection between laparoscopic colon and rectal surgeries: sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Japan-Multinational Trial Organization PREV 07-01). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1775–1784.10.1007/s00384-016-2643-127604812Search in Google Scholar

30. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:2039–2046.10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.976323999949Search in Google Scholar

31. Biondo S, Kreisler E, Fraccalvieri D, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection for rectal cancer. A multivariate analysis on 2131 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e95–e102.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02798.x21883813Search in Google Scholar

32. Konanz J, Herrle F, Weiss C, et al. Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:679–688.10.1007/s00384-013-1683-z23571868Search in Google Scholar

33. Zlobec I, Minoo P, Karamitopoulou E, et al. Role of tumor size in the pre-operative management of rectal cancer patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:61.10.1186/1471-230X-10-61290022120550703Search in Google Scholar

34. Langman G, Patel A, Bowley DM. Size and distribution of lymph nodes in rectal cancer resection specimens. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:406–414.10.1097/DCR.000000000000032125751797Search in Google Scholar

35. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae136012315273542Search in Google Scholar