General Characteristics and Quality of Stroke-Related Online Information – A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Romanian and Hungarian Websites

1. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE et al. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;10:53.10.1186/1471-2458-7-53185592317425798Search in Google Scholar

2. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Internet Project. Online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf Accessed: 29.07.2018.Search in Google Scholar

3. Statista.com. Share of Europeans who use the internet to search for health-related information in 2014. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/451258/internet-use-for-health-related-information-europe/ Accessed: 29.07.2018.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hoffmann D, Schwartz J. Stopping deceptive health claims: the need for a private right of action under federal law. Am J Law Med. 2016;42:53-84.10.1177/009885881664471527263263Search in Google Scholar

5. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691-2700.10.1001/jama.287.20.269112020305Search in Google Scholar

6. Nădăşan V. The Quality of Online Health-Related Information - an Emergent Consumer Health Issue. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2016;62:408-421.10.1515/amma-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar

7. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch HU, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:20.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309Search in Google Scholar

8. Nădășan V. Should Critical Care Professionals Take Hoaxes/Rumours Seriously? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016;2:205-206.10.1515/jccm-2016-0030Search in Google Scholar

9. Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabic M, Sachde S. Stroke: a global response is needed . Online: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/9/16-181636/en/. Accessed: 30.07.2018.Search in Google Scholar

10. CDC. Stroke Facts-Stroke Statistics, 2017. Online: https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/facts.htm. Accessed: 30.07.2018.Search in Google Scholar

11. Nădăşan V, Roşca AN, Tarcea M, Ábrám Z, Măruşteri M. The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:703-707.10.1007/s13187-016-1145-827888472Search in Google Scholar

12. Nădăşan V, Moldovan O. The Completeness and Accuracy of Information about Coeliac Disease on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2016;11:70-76.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z. The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2011;6:18-26.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nădăşan V, Moldovan G, Tarcea M, Ureche R. Edified or confused? How complete and accurate is the information about vitamin B12 on the Romanian Websites? Revista de Igienă şi Sănătate Publică, Timişoara. 2011;61:49-57.Search in Google Scholar

15. Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R. The quality of information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2011;2:312-4.Search in Google Scholar

16. Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S. Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:530-5.10.1136/jech.57.7.530173250212821703Search in Google Scholar

17. Ching T, Roake JA, Lewis DR. Net-based information on varicose vein treatments: a tangled web. N Z Med J. 2010;123:9-15.Search in Google Scholar

18. Killeen S, Hennessey A, El Hassan Y, et al. Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial. Am J Surg. 2011;201:171-8.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.01520851373Search in Google Scholar

19. Ream E, Blows E, Scanlon K, Richardson A. An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:10-5.10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.01919179036Search in Google Scholar

20. Ni Riordain R, McCreary C. Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:675-7.10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.00619095486Search in Google Scholar

21. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:e95-8.10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.01719457707Search in Google Scholar

22. Dulaney C, Barrett OC, Rais-Bahrami S, Wakefield D, Fiveash J, Dobelbower M. Quality of Prostate Cancer Treatment Information on Cancer Center Websites. Cureus. 2016;8:e580.10.7759/cureus.580487600627226941Search in Google Scholar

23. Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE. Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology. 2009;74:1058-63.10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.09119758687Search in Google Scholar

24. Ostry A, Young ML, Hughes M. The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:648-55.10.1093/her/cym05017897928Search in Google Scholar

25. Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J. 2010;10:350-4.10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.00920362253Search in Google Scholar

26. Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580-6.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.03418926463Search in Google Scholar

27. Bastos A, Paiva D, Azevedo A. Quality of health information on acute myocardial infarction and stroke in the world wide web. Acta Med Port. 2014;27:223-31.10.20344/amp.404624813491Search in Google Scholar

28. Cerminara C, Santarone ME, Casarelli L, Curatolo P, El Malhany N. Use of the DISCERN tool for evaluating web searches in childhood epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;41:119-21.10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.05325461201Search in Google Scholar

29. Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G. Eye-Tracking Analysis of User Behavior in WWW Search. Online: www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/granka_etal_04a.pdf. Accessed: 29.07.2018.Search in Google Scholar