The Influence of Selected Brushing Process Parameters on the Tool's Operating Time
Mar 31, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 31, 2025
Page range: 61 - 69
Received: Mar 27, 2024
Accepted: Oct 10, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2025-0008
Keywords
© 2025 Karol Falandys et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.
![Implementation scheme of experiment (3 input factors on 2 levels) [42]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67f3415f8d1bec042eac83d9/j_ama-2025-0008_fig_004.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250909%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250909T202253Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=044ed34e4e67fd672aaba7bbb7b23e8683c60b7524b87617eda7fa526d196276&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 11.

Test results – measured bristle thickness
1 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.72 |
3 | 0.6 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
4 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.6 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.7 | 0.60 |
5 | 0.4 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.8 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.8 | 0.62 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.7 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.3 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.4 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.5 | 0.44 |
8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.3 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.49 | 0.55 |
Test matrix, columns X1, X2, X3 define the top level (“+”) and bottom level (“−”) of selected process parameters
1 | + | + | + | 2000 | 200 | 60 |
2 | + | + | − | 2000 | 200 | 30 |
3 | + | − | + | 2000 | 198 | 60 |
4 | + | − | − | 2000 | 198 | 30 |
5 | − | + | + | 1400 | 200 | 60 |
6 | − | + | − | 1400 | 200 | 30 |
7 | − | − | + | 1400 | 198 | 60 |
8 | − | − | − | 1400 | 198 | 30 |
Results of the tests - the radius of edge break in chosen locations of the detail
- | A | B | C | D | E | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.29 |
2 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
3 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
4 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.3 |
5 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.27 |
6 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.25 |
7 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
8 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.35 |
Error variance for individual trials
1 | 0.0079 |
2 | 0.0253 |
3 | 0.0010 |
4 | 0.0070 |
5 | 0.0200 |
6 | 0.0171 |
7 | 0.0094 |
8 | 0.0276 |