Open Access

Behaviour of a Non-Newtonian Fluid in a Helical Tube Under the Influence of Thermal Buoyancy


Cite

1. Ibrahim M, Algehyne EA, Saeed T, Berrouk A S, Chu Y M, Cheraghian G. Assessment of economic, thermal and hydraulic performances a corrugated helical heat exchanger filled with non-Newtonian nanofluid. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 11568.10.1038/s41598-021-90953-6817292134078974 Search in Google Scholar

2. Naphon P, Wiriyasart S, Prurapark R, Srichat A. Numerical study on the nanofluid flows and temperature behaviors in the spirally coiled tubes with helical ribs. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2021; 27: 101204.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101204 Search in Google Scholar

3. Abu-Hamdeh NH, Alsulami RA, Rawa MJH, Aljinaidi AA, Alazwari M A, Eltaher MA, Almitani KA, Alnefaie KH, Abusorrah AM, Sindi HF, Goodarzi M, Safaei MR. A detailed hydrothermal investigation of a helical micro double-tube heat exchanger for a wide range of helix pitch length. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2021; 28:101413.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101413 Search in Google Scholar

4. Abdzadeh B, Hosainpour A, Jafarmadar S, Sharifian F. Thermoentropic evaluation of the effect of air injection into horizontal helical tube. Journal of Energy Storage. 2021; 38:102542.10.1016/j.est.2021.102542 Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhou C, Yao Y, Ni L. Development of heat transfer correlations for multi-row helically coile d tub e heat exchangers use d in surface water heat pump systems. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020; 163: 120491.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120491 Search in Google Scholar

6. Jha VK, Bhaumik SK. Enhanced cooling in compact helical tube cross-flow heat exchanger through higher area density and flow tortuosity. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020; 150: 119270.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119270 Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhao H, Li X, Wu Y, Wu X. Friction factor and Nusselt number correlations for forced convection in helical tubes. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020; 155: 119759.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119759 Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhou C, Zarrella A, Yao Y, Ni L. Analysis of the effect of icing on the thermal behavior of helical coil heat exchangers in surface water heat pump applications. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2022; 183: 122074.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122074 Search in Google Scholar

9. Cao Y, Ayed H, Anqi A E, Tutunchian O, Dizaji H S, Pourhedayat S. Helical tube-in-tube heat exchanger with corrugated inner tube and corrugated outer tube: experimental and numerical study. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2021; 170: 107139.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107139 Search in Google Scholar

10. Ahn K, Lee KH, Lee JS, Won C, Yoon J. Analytic spring back prediction in cylindrical tube bending for helical tube steam generator. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2020; 52: 2100-2106.10.1016/j.net.2020.02.004 Search in Google Scholar

11. Farnam M, Khoshvaght-Aliabadi M, Asadollahzadeh MJ. Intensified single-phase forced convective heat transfer with helical-twisted tube in coil heat exchangers. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2021; 154: 108108.10.1016/j.anucene.2020.108108 Search in Google Scholar

12. Eisapour A H, Naghizadeh A, Eisapour M, Talebizadehsardari P. Optimal design of a metal hydride hydrogen storage bed using a helical coil heat exchanger along with a central return tube during the absorption process. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2021; 46: 14478-14493.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.170 Search in Google Scholar

13. Gul S, Erge O, Oort E V. Frictional pressure losses of Non-Newtonian fluids in helical pipes: Applications for automated rheology measurements. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2020; 73: 103042.10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103042 Search in Google Scholar

14. Gul S, Erge O, Oort E V. Helical Pipe Viscometer System for Automated Mud Rheology Measurements. IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition. 2020; IADC/SPE-199572-MS.10.2118/199572-MS Search in Google Scholar

15. Mokeddem M, Laidoudi H, Bouzit M. 3D Simulation of Dean vortices at 30 position of 180 curved duct of square cross-section under opposing buoyancy. Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2018; 389: 153-163.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.389.153 Search in Google Scholar

16. Mokeddem M, Laidoudi H, Makinde OD, Bouzit M. 3D Simulation of incompressible poiseuille flow through 180° curved duct of square cross-section under effect of thermal buoyancy. Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering. 2019; 63: 257-269.10.3311/PPme.12773 Search in Google Scholar

17. Mokeddem M, Laidoudi H, Bouzit M. Computational Analyses of Flow and Heat Transfer at 60° Position of 180° Curved Duct of Square Cross-Section. Diffusion Foundations. 2020; 26: 53-62.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DF.26.53 Search in Google Scholar

18. Cao X, Du T, Liu Z, Zhai H. Experimental and numerical investigation on heat transfer and fluid flow performance of sextant helical baffle heat exchangers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019; 142: 118437.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118437 Search in Google Scholar

19. Cao X, Chen D, Du T, Liu Z, Ji S. Numerical investigation and experimental validation of thermo-hydraulic and thermodynamic performances of helical baffle heat exchangers with different baffle configurations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020; 160: 120181.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120181 Search in Google Scholar

20. Chen Y, Tang H, Wu J, Gu H, Yang S. Performance comparison of heat exchangers using sextant/trisection helical baffles and segmental ones. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2019; 27: 2892–2899.10.1016/j.cjche.2019.07.006 Search in Google Scholar

21. Chen D, Zhang R, Cao X, Chen L, Fan X. Numerical investigation on performance improvement of latent heat exchanger with sextant helical baffles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021; 178: 121606.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121606 Search in Google Scholar

22. Jamshidi N, Mosaffa A. Investigating the effects of geometric parameters on finned conical helical geothermal heat exchanger and its energy extraction capability. Geothermics. 2018; 76: 177–189.10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.07.007 Search in Google Scholar

23. Abu-Hamdeh NH, Almitani KH, Alimoradi A. Exergetic performance of the helically coiled tubeheat exchangers: Comparison the sector-by-sector with tube in tube types. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2021; 60: 979–993.10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.025 Search in Google Scholar

24. Abu-Hamdeh NH, Bantan RAR, Tlili I. Analysis of the thermal and hydraulic performance of the sector-by-sector helically coiled tube heat exchangers as a new type of heat exchangers. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2020; 150: 106229.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.106229 Search in Google Scholar

25. Liu S, Huang W, Bao Z, Zeng T, Qiao M, Meng J. Analysis, prediction and multi-objective optimization of helically coiled tube-intube heat exchanger with double cooling source using RSM. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2021; 159: 106568.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106568 Search in Google Scholar

26. Mirgolbabaei H. Numerical investigation of vertical helically coiled tube heat exchangers thermal performance. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2018; 136: 252–259.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.061 Search in Google Scholar

27. Javadi H, Ajarostaghi S S M, Pourfallah M, Zaboli M. Performance analysis of helical ground heat exchangers with different configurations. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019; 154: 24–36.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.021 Search in Google Scholar

28. Maghrabie H M, Attalla M, Mohsen AAA. Performance assessment of a shell and helically coiled tube heat exchanger with variable orientations utilizing different nanofluids. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2021; 182: 116013.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116013 Search in Google Scholar

29. Vivekanandan M, Venkatesh R, Periyasamy R, Mohankumar S, Devakumar L. Experimental and CFD investigation of helical coil heat exchanger with flower baffle. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 37: 2174–2182.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.642 Search in Google Scholar

30. Sadhasivam C, Murugan S, Manikandaprabu P, Priyadharshini SM, Vairamuthu J. Computational investigations on helical heat flow exchanger in automotive radiator tubes with computational fluid dynamics, Materials Today : Proceedings. 2021; 37: 2352–2355.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.069 Search in Google Scholar

31. Gokulnathan E, Pradeep S, Jayan N, Bhatlu M L D, Karthikeyan S. Review of heat transfer enhancement on helical coil heat exchanger by additive passive method, Materials Today. Proceedings. 2021; 37: 3024–3027.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.725 Search in Google Scholar

32. Padmanabhan S, Reddy OY, Yadav KVAK, Raja VKB, Palanikumar K. Heat transfer analysis of double tube heat exchanger with helical inserts, Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 46: 3588–3595.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.337 Search in Google Scholar

33. Naik B, Hosmani A K, Kerur S M, Jadhav CC, Benni S, Annigeri S, Javali T, Aralikatti P. Numerical analysis of two tube helical heat exchanger using various nano-fluids, Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 47: 3137–3143.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.187 Search in Google Scholar

34. Kumar PCM, Chandrasekar M. CFD analysis on heat and flow characteristics of double helically coiled tube heat exchanger handling MWCNT/water nanofluids. Heliyon. 2019; 5: e02030.10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02030666778831388569 Search in Google Scholar

35. Dhumal G S, Havaldar SN, Numerical investigation of heat exchanger with inserted twisted tape inside and helical fins on outside pipe surface. Materials Today. Proceedings. 2021; 46: 2557–2563.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.837 Search in Google Scholar

36. Kareem R. Optimisation of Double Pipe Helical Tube Heat Exchanger and its Comparison with Straight Double Tube Heat Exchanger. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C. 2017; 98, 587–593.10.1007/s40032-016-0261-x Search in Google Scholar

37. Zainith P, Mishra N K. Heat Transfer Enhancement of Al2O3-Based Nanofluid in a Shell and Helical Coil Heat Exchanger.Advances in Applied Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1201-8_1810.1007/978-981-15-1201-8_18 Search in Google Scholar

38. Miansari M., Jafarzadeh A., Arasteh H. and Toghraie D. (2021), Thermal performance of a helical shell and tube heat exchanger without fin, with circular fins, and with V-shaped circular fins applying on the coil, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,143, 4273–4285.10.1007/s10973-020-09395-3 Search in Google Scholar

39. Bara B, Nandakumar K, Masliyah J H. An experimental and numerical study of the Dean problem: flow development towards two-dimensional multiple solutions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1992; 244: 339–376.10.1017/S0022112092003100 Search in Google Scholar

40. Helin L, Thais L, Mompean G. Numerical simulation of viscoelastic Dean vortices in a curved duct. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2009; 156: 84–94.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.07.002 Search in Google Scholar