Polyurethanes as Biomaterials in Medicine: Advanced Applications, Infection Challenges, and Innovative Surface Modification Methods
Published Online: Jan 29, 2025
Page range: 223 - 238
Received: Dec 01, 2024
Accepted: Dec 01, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/am-2024-0018
Keywords
© 2024 Kamil Drożdż et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Polyurethanes (PUs) are widely used in the production of medical devices. Due to their specific properties, some types of PUs can also be classified as biomaterials, depending on their application and compatibility with biological systems. A biomaterial can be described as “any substance or combination of substances, other than drugs, synthetic or natural, that can be used for any period of time and extends or replaces partially or completely any tissue, organ or function of the body” by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (Bergman and Stumpf 2013).
The first research on polyurethanes was carried out by Otto Bayer in 1937. He studied the polyaddition reaction between diisocyanate and polyester diol, which enabled their use during the Second World War, mainly as adhesives and foams. Soon after the war, with the development of commercial production of flexible PU foams in the 1950s, PU industrial production began to include elastomers and coatings. During the same period, in response to the commercial success of Nylon 6.6, a condensation polymer developed by Du Pont, German teams led by Bayer investigated new methods of polymerization, which led to the creation of polyurethanes with properties similar to nylon. These new polyurethanes had lower water absorption and better mechanical and electrical stability than nylon. The evolution of PU technology continued, including developing more sustainable bio-based materials and improved production methods in an environmentally friendly direction (Ratner
Polyurethanes are synthesized through a complex process of urethane linkage. The process starts with a two-step synthesis strategy using three precursors: diisocyanates, diols and chain extenders, which together form the hard and soft segments of the polymer. The key process is the polyaddition reaction, in which the isocyanate NCO group reacts with the labile hydrogen of active compounds such as hydroxyls or amines to form permanent urethane bonds. These bonds a small but essential part of the chain, are formed by the reaction of isocyanates with alcohols (Fig. 1). Macroglycol, the main component, determines most of these bonds, which affect flexibility and fatigue resistance. Because the material is one large molecule, it cannot be dissolved or forced to flow by applying heat and pressure. This feature means that once a thermoset elastomer is formed, it cannot be further processed (Ratner

Diagram of the synthesis of polyurethanes and their application in medical devices.
PUs are a class of polymers that have, today, achieved industrial importance due to their tough and elastomeric properties and good fatigue resistance (Gunatilake
The main objective of this work is to provide a comprehensive overview of polyurethanes and their various applications in medicine and to outline the current challenges of biomaterial infections, especially those involving polyurethane-based devices. In addition, the paper discusses innovative surface modification techniques for polyurethanes to enhance their antimicrobial properties.
PUs stand out as one of the most versatile classes of polymer materials. Their versatility is primarily due to their segmented structure, including hard and soft segments (Rusu
The hard segments in polyurethanes provide increased mechanical resistance. They consist of isocyanates and chain extenders. Their high transition temperature and pronounced crystallinity contribute to the material’s mechanical strength. The content and chemistry of the hard segments have a direct impact on tensile strength and modulus. The amount of isocyanates and chain extenders determines the physical characteristics of polyurethane, and their type (aromatic or aliphatic) affects reactions with nucleophilic reagents and the material’s toxicity. Aromatic isocyanates are highly reactive but can lead to side effects in carcinogenic degradation products, whereas aliphatic isocyanates have a lower toxicity potential (Somdee
They are valued for their excellent biocompatibility, exceptional resistance to hydrolytic processes, high abrasion resistance and outstanding mechanical durability, including resistance to bending. Their diversity manifests in adhesives, coatings, sealants or foams, available in a wide range of Shore hardnesses (Shin
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European MDCG 2021–24, implants made of biomaterials are devices placed inside the body or on the body’s surface (EC 2021; FDA 2023). A distinction can be made between long-term implants, which have a lifespan of 30 days or more in contact with a tissue before biodegradation or removal to promote healing to the tissue remodeling phase. In contrast, short-term implants have less than 30 days of lifespan in contact with living tissues. Finally, non-implantable devices are materials designed to be placed on the body’s surface (EC 2021; FDA 2023). The properties mentioned above render polyurethanes ideal materials for various medical device components (Fig. 1).
Polyurethanes are ideal materials for a wide range of medical devices due to their versatility. In non-implantation applications, they are valued for their excellent mechanical and chemical properties. For instance, polyurethane-based materials are used in wound dressings and membranes (Khodabakhshi
Polyurethanes are also utilized in intravenous line (IV) tubing due to their flexibility and kink resistance, ensuring continuous fluid delivery (Wang and Wang 2012, Tokhadzé
Polyurethane tracheostomy tubes increase patient comfort and reduce tissue irritation due to their softness and flexibility (Björling 2009; Guo
These examples highlight polyurethanes’ versatility and essential role in medical technology, from external devices to long-term implants, significantly contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of life.
Medical-grade PU-based polymers can be found under several trade names, such as Carbothane™, Pellethane® or Tecoflex™ from Lubrizol (USA) and Carbosil® and Bionate® from DSM (Netherlands) (Wendels and Avérous 2021).
Advances in medical technology have made the use of various PU medical devices an integral part of patient care, significantly improving survival rates and quality of life. However, it should be explicitly stated that parent polyurethanes have no intrinsic antimicrobial activity, which poses additional challenges in preventing infections associated with their use. The colonization of medical devices by microorganisms can lead to severe infections, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (Pen
The available literature data is general and does not apply exclusively to polyurethane medical devices. This is because hospitals and clinical teams often do not consider the diversity of biomaterials used in medical devices, which significantly hinders detailed analyses of their impact on infection risk.
The insertion of respiratory biomaterials, such as tracheostomy tubes, is often essential in treating patients requiring long-term respiratory support. The tracheostomy procedure is an alternative to prolonged endotracheal intubation, offering better control of the patient’s airway and reducing the risk of nosocomial infections. Nevertheless, using such devices may be associated with complications, such as granuloma formation, which can lead to bleeding, airway obstruction or scab formation. In addition, tracheostomy tubes may provide a site for colonization by microorganisms, promoting infection development (Cheung and Napolitano 2014).
These include different bacterial species such as
A study conducted in twenty-seven intensive care units across nine European countries reported a VAP rate of 18.3 cases per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation. The predominant pathogens were
In addition to colonizing the tracheostomy tube, the natural microbiome colonizing patients is also essential. It is estimated that approximately 20% of healthy individuals are chronically colonized by
In addition, patients colonized by MRSA tend to have more prolonged mechanical ventilation and poorer clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for strict infection control and targeted therapies (Feeney
As a result, it can lead to patient death. Scientific sources report that VAP mortality rates range from 20–30% (Restrepo
The use of medical devices, including pacemakers, defibrillators, stents, and heart valves, has increased dramatically over the past fifty years. Today, more than 1.7 million cardiovascular devices and over one million other medical devices are implanted worldwide annually (Scialla
Infective endocarditis (IE) associated with implantable devices, such as artificial valves, is referred to as prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). PVE is a severe complication of heart valve replacement surgery, with a reported mortality rate ranging from 20% to 80% (Angelina
In early PVE, the lack of endothelialization of the suture ring and adjacent tissue plays a key role. When combined with the presence of adhesion proteins such as fibrinogen and fibronectin, it facilitates the development of infection. Additionally, early PVE often results from accidental contamination during surgery or hematogenous spread occurring postoperatively within the first hours to months. In contrast, during late PVE, the heart valve structures are fully covered by endothelium, and the pathogenesis of the disease more closely resembles that of native valve endocarditis (NVE) (Galar
Other examples of biomaterial-related infections include infections of synthetic blood vessels, which typically result from direct contamination during surgery (Hasse
Another group of biomaterials, some made from polyurethanes, includes implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs). This group comprises implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTDs), and permanent pacemakers (PPMs) (Armaganijan and Healey 2011). In 2010, approximately 40,000 ICEDs were implanted in the UK (Sandoe
Studies indicate that the infection rate associated with ICEDs is relatively low, ranging from 0.5% to 2.2%. However, the mortality rate of these infections is as high as 35% (Sandoe
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in managing critically ill patients, particularly those in intensive care units (ICUs). They facilitate intravenous access, enabling the administration of drugs and fluids, as well as the collection of blood for laboratory analysis (Gomes Resende de Souza da Silva
Another infection associated with biomaterials is catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). CAUTI occurs when bacteria enter the urinary tract due to using a urinary catheter, a tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine when a patient cannot urinate independently.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are significant due to their high prevalence, as they are one of the most common healthcare-acquired infections, accounting for up to 40% of hospital-acquired infections (Rubi
The most commonly identified microorganisms in the biofilms of long-term catheterized patients include
Bacterial biofilm represents a significant challenge in each of the infections mentioned above. A biofilm is a structured community of microorganisms growing within a self-produced matrix of polymeric materials (Das

Biofilm formation by
The formation of a biofilm occurs in four stages: initial attachment, biofilm accumulation, maturation, and dispersion (Fig. 3).

Stages of bacterial biofilm formation on polyurethane medical devices: stage I – Initial attachment, stage II – Biofilm accumulation, stage III Biofilm maturation, stage IV – Dispersion of biofilms.
The first and most critical stage of biofilm formation by bacteria is the reversible adhesion of planktonic bacteria. This process occurs due to the ability of bacteria and surfaces to form covalent or ionic bonds. Additionally, weaker forces, such as polar bonds, hydrogen bonds, or Lifshitz-van der Waals interactions, can enhance or lead to strong interactions when many contact points are involved (Carniello
In the second stage, bacterial adhesion transitions from a reversible to a more permanent state through physicochemical mechanisms that do not yet involve changes in gene expression. This process occurs on a timescale of minutes and depends on surface characteristics (e.g., hydrophobicity, charge) and environmental conditions (Carniello
Mechanisms of bond strengthening and the transition to irreversible adhesion include:
Removal of interfacial water: This allows closer contact between bacteria and the surface, enabling the formation of acid-base interactions (Olsson
Nanoscopic deformation of the cell wall: Deformation under adhesion forces increases the interactions between the bacterium and the surface, thereby strengthening adhesion (Chen
Multi-molecule binding: Over time, additional adhesion structures (e.g., pili) become involved in binding to the surface, reducing the likelihood of simultaneous detachment (Sjollema
Subsequently, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production begins, marking the transition to a strictly biological process. Studies indicate that pilimediated adhesions in
The third stage is biofilm maturation, during which bacteria proliferate to form a heterogeneous threedimensional structure. Within this structure, zones of variable cell growth and gene expression emerge. At this stage, a high density of bacterial cells is established, enabling communication through quorum sensing. This process facilitates biofilm growth and supports a coordinated response to environmental changes, such as fluctuations in nutrient availability and stress conditions (Mukherjee
The final stage of biofilm development is dispersion, during which individual bacterial cells or microcolonies are released, potentially producing new biofilms (Arciola
Biofilms on biomaterials present a serious challenge in medicine and engineering, causing infection-related complications, device durability, and treatment efficacy. Antibiotic resistance, recognized as one of the most significant global health threats, is increasingly associated with biofilms, which exhibit adaptive resistance depending on their growth stage. As a community of microorganisms embedded in an EPS, biofilms enable bacteria to survive environmental stresses, enhancing their resistance to antibiotics and host defense mechanisms (Dostert
When biofilms develop on medical devices made of various biomaterials, long-term therapy is often required, and in many cases, implant removal becomes necessary (Li
The economic burden of treating biofilm-related infections is substantial. For example, treating
Given these challenges, there is an urgent need to develop alternatives to traditional antibiotics that can directly inhibit or eliminate biofilms.
Modern materials engineering and biomedicine increasingly utilize advanced surface modification techniques to meet the demands placed on contemporary biomaterials. It is essential to tailor the mechanical properties and optimize polymeric materials’ chemical and topographical characteristics to enhance their functionality in various medical and technological applications. Developing innovative modification methods opens up new opportunities in designing materials with highly specific properties. This progress can drive advancements in tissue engineering, implant manufacturing, and drug delivery technologies (Fig. 3).
One technique for processing polyurethanes is laser surface texturing (LST). This method modifies the surfaces of polymer biomaterials using a laser beam. LST offers numerous advantages, such as altering surface roughness and chemistry in a single step without using toxic substances. Laser surface texturing can also alter polymer surfaces on the macro-, micro, and nanoscale with high spatial and temporal resolution (Lippert 2004) (Fig. 4a).

Methods applied for the surface treatment of polyurethane polymers: a) Laser Surface Texturing, b) Nanoparticle Grafting, c) Cold spraying metallization, d) Ion Implantation, e) Low-temperature plasma, f) Biodegradable and biocompatible polyurethanes.
Laser processing technology enables the creation of submicrometer structures on polyurethane surfaces, first documented for components around 250 nm in size. Studies have shown that periodic line-like patterns with spatial periods of up to 500 nm can be achieved using this technique. The depth of these structures ranges from 0.88 to 1.25 μm for periods larger than 2.0 μm. It reaches up to 270 nm for periods between 500 nm and 1.0 μm, demonstrating precise control over the parameters of the textures obtained (Estevam-Alves
In comparison, the average size of most bacteria falls within the 1–2 μm range. As a result, surfaces with submicron topographies have been found to exhibit antimicrobial properties (Siddiquie
Nanoparticle grafting involves attaching nanoparticles to the surface of a polymer, often through covalent bonds, to enhance surface properties. This process allows for the modification of both the physical and chemical properties of the polymer and the nanoparticles, thereby expanding their application potential across various technological fields. Grafting nanoparticles onto polymers is typically achieved using chemical methods such as ‘grafting to’ and ‘grafting from.’ This technique is gaining popularity due to its ability to improve nanoparticles’ dispersion, chemical reactivity, and stability within polymer matrices, making them more effective in advanced material applications (Kango
Various chemical techniques, including silane coupling agents, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, are employed to graft polymers onto nanoparticles. These techniques allow fine-tuning of the surface properties of nanoparticles and their compatibility with polymer matrices, making them more versatile and practical in a wide range of applications (Kango
One example of nanoparticle grafting is the creation of polyurethane nanofibers with incorporated ZnAg composite nanoparticles for use in antibacterial wound dressings. The grafting process involved synthesizing ZnAg composite nanoparticles (silver and zinc oxide) and incorporating them into polyurethane nanofibers (PUZnAg) through electrospinning. The resulting PUZnAg nanofibers demonstrated excellent antibacterial properties. Specifically, the PUZnAg2 sample, containing 8% ZnAg by weight, exhibited 100% antibacterial efficacy against
A similar technique was used for the single-phase synthesis of silver (Ag) nanoparticles embedded in polyurethane (PU) nanofibers. These PU/Ag nanofibers showed antibacterial efficacy against
Another potential application of polyurethanes is in flexible nanocomposite foams based on biocompatible thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and ZnO nanoparticles, which have potential uses as wound dressings. The TPU/ZnO foams were produced using the thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) method. This resulted in a highly porous structure with pore sizes ranging from 10 to 60 μm, allowing water vapor transport up to 8.9 mg/cm2-h. The TPU/ZnO foams exhibited strong antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, such as
Ion implantation is a process in which ions of a specific element are accelerated and introduced into the surface of a polymer, leading to the formation of metallic nanoparticles within the polymer matrix. This technique allows for the modification of both the chemical and physical properties of the surface without altering the bulk material’s properties. Ion implantation enables the creation of advanced metal-polymer nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical properties, such as increased strength, wear resistance, and improved electrical conductivity. This method is widely applied in medical implants, biomaterials, and electronics (Popok
Recent studies have demonstrated significant microbiological effects of modifying polyurethane (PU) surfaces using nitrogen ion implantation (N2+). This treatment substantially reduced the viability of
The plasma ion implantation (PIII) method also shows great promise in improving the antimicrobial properties of polymeric biomaterials, such as polyurethane (PU) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). This technique significantly reduces bacterial adhesion on modified materials, crucial for preventing infections related to medical implants. For instance, PIII-modified PET surfaces treated with acetylene (C2H2) exhibited a marked decrease in the adhesion of bacteria, including
Cold spraying, also known as cold dynamic gas spray (CGDS) technology, is an advanced method of applying coatings and depositing powder materials to various surfaces. The process involves accelerating powder particles to supersonic speeds (300–1200 m/s) using a gas jet (e.g., nitrogen, helium or air) passed through a special nozzle. After hitting the substrate, the particles experience intense plastic deformation phenomena, which enables effective adhesion without melting the material (Dai
Cold spraying is emerging as a promising technique for biomedical applications, particularly for improving the properties of PUs. The process involves the deposition of various materials, including metals, ceramics, and composites, onto the surface of polymers without the risk of thermal degradation, which is essential for medical materials. One of the key application areas for this technique is to improve biomaterials’ biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties, which is particularly important in medical devices such as prostheses and internal fixation systems. With cold spraying coatings, these biomaterials can achieve improved cell adhesion, reduced cytotoxicity, and improved mechanical properties, making them ideal for implant applications (Vilardell
Another example of using cold spray metallization techniques is the production of copper coatings on carbon steel. Silva
The integration of natural biopolymers into polyurethane (PU) matrices is a promising approach to enhance their antimicrobial properties and prevent biofilm formation. Modifying PUs with components like chitosan and alginate during synthesis makes it possible to create materials with improved biocompatibility, biodegradability, and antimicrobial properties (Uscátegui
Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide derived from crustaceans, making it a dedicated and renewable resource. Studies have shown that it is biocompatible, biodegradable, bioadhesive, non-toxic, and possesses antimicrobial properties (Confederat
Building on this foundation, the research team led by Villani
The research conducted by Khan
In summary, incorporating natural biopolymers like chitosan and alginate into polyurethane matrices enhances their antimicrobial efficacy by disrupting bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. These modifications address critical challenges in biomaterials engineering, particularly for medical devices prone to infection.
Plasma, often referred to as the fourth state of matter, is a powerful tool for surface modification of polymers, including polyurethanes. Plasma treatment involves the exposure of polyurethane surfaces to a gaseous environment containing ions, radicals, and photons (visible and near-UV), leading to physical and chemical surface modifications (Friedrich
The interaction of plasma with polymer materials can be divided into three stages:
Surface cleaning: In this stage, organic impurities are mainly removed.
Chemical modification: In this stage, C-C and C=C bonds are broken, and fragments of dissociated plasma gas are incorporated as functional groups through H-substitution in the polymer chain.
Surface etching and nanotopography creation: For longer exposure times, plasma etches the surface and creates nanotopography.
However, a significant challenge lies in introducing plasma energy into polyurethanes. While this energy is necessary to sustain the plasma state, it also poses a risk of degrading the polymer material. Excessive energy delivery can break C-H and C-C chemical bonds, which are crucial for the structural stability of polymers (Friedrich
In biomaterials engineering, there are various surface treatment methods in which plasma plays a key role. Low-temperature plasma is one of the most effective techniques for surface modification of biomaterials, such as polyurethanes. Due to its unique properties and wide range of applications, this method allows selective surface modification in inert (e.g., argon) or reactive (e.g., oxygen) atmospheres, providing precise control over the chemical changes introduced. For polyurethanes, the modification must be tailored to the specific material, considering chemical composition, crystallinity, and thickness factors. It is essential to optimize parameters like the type of feed gas (oxidizing, reducing, inert), gas partial pressure, plasma generator power, and exposure time. Thanks to its flexibility, low-temperature plasma is particularly effective in enhancing the surface properties of polyurethanes without altering their bulk characteristics (Alves
Polyurethanes (PUs) have emerged as highly versatile materials in modern medicine, offering unparalleled opportunities for innovation in medical devices ranging from wound dressings to artificial heart valves. Their exceptional mechanical properties, adaptability, and biocompatibility make them indispensable in diverse medical applications. However, parent PUs lack intrinsic antimicrobial properties, posing significant challenges in preventing biofilm formation and associated infections.
Innovative surface modification techniques, such as laser texturing, nanoparticle deposition, ion implantation, and plasma treatments, show great promise in addressing these challenges. These methods enhance the antimicrobial properties of PUs and improve their biocompatibility, paving the way for safer and more effective medical devices. Furthermore, integrating natural polymers and biodegradable components into PU matrices offers an additional avenue for enhancing their functionality while aligning with sustainability goals.
Looking forward, further research should focus on translating these laboratory advancements into clinical settings, optimizing the long-term performance of PU-based biomaterials, and exploring their applications in regenerative medicine and personalized therapies. Overcoming these challenges will require multidisciplinary collaboration, combining materials science, microbiology, and clinical expertise to unlock the full potential of polyurethanes in healthcare.
By advancing the design and functionality of polyurethane biomaterials, the scientific community can contribute to groundbreaking innovations that will enhance patient outcomes and inspire new directions in biomaterials science. This review underscores the need for continued focus on addressing infection risks while maximizing the unique advantages of polyurethanes in modern medicine.