1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-6725
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Evaluation of Properties of Dexamethasone Eye Drops

Published Online: 24 Aug 2023
Volume & Issue: AHEAD OF PRINT
Page range: -
Received: 21 Jun 2023
Accepted: 22 Jun 2023
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-6725
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
INTRODUCTION

Ophthalmic drugs are specific medicinal forms that are subject to various quality requirements, including sterility. When formulating ophthalmic drugs, it is necessary to adjust the osmotic pressure and acidity, while also considering the stability of the drug. Other parameters that influence the effect of ophthalmic liquid medicines are viscosity and surface tension, and possibly also the size of suspended particles. The increase in viscosity is also related to the use of polymers, where we can encounter the problem of evaluating the necessary amount of tonicity-adjusting agent because osmotic as well as oncotic pressure must be considered (Bouwman-Boer et al., 2015).

As a viscosity-increasing agent, chitosan, a polymer with many benefits and having a wide application in various pharmaceutical forms, is increasingly used in ophthalmic liquid medicines (Alonso et al., 2003). Another advantage of chitosan is its antimicrobial effect (Hosseinnejad et al., 2016, Matušová et al., 2007) and nonirritating properties when applied to the eye (Felt et al., 1999).

An important attribute when applying drugs to the eye is their low irritability, which is achieved through the use of nonirritating components of the dosage form and also suitable physicochemical parameters of the finished dosage form. Irritability can be evaluated in laboratory animals, but other methods are increasingly used. The European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternative Methods to Animal Testing (EURL-ECVAM) has an important role in this process (Casati et al., 2017).

Alternative tests include monitoring the toxic effect in vivo on simple organisms, in vitro on tissues, cells, and in silico by modeling experiments with software tools on computers, or a combination of these approaches (Tichý, 2005). An in vitro test is performed using isolated tissues, organs, or cells in a test tube or outside a living organism. If living cells are involved, the term ex vivo is also used for these tests. Of the in silico methods, the most widespread are QSAR models – quantitative relationships between chemical structure and biological effectiveness. They are mathematical models that can be used to predict the physicochemical and biological properties of compounds and the fate of these compounds in the environment based on knowledge of their chemical structure (Vitková et al., 2016).

Although the in vivo Draize eye irritation test on albino rabbits according to OECD 405 (10) is still the standard method for evaluating eye irritation or assessment of eye damage potential, in vitro variants of this test are also being sought. One of the alternative methods for assessing irritation is the test on erythrocytes called the “Red Blood Cell (RBC) Hemolysis Test” using, for example, sheep erythrocytes (Scott et al., 2010, Lagarto et al., 2006).

Erythrocytes or RBCs are the most numerous blood cells, making up 45% of human blood volume. The rest is blood plasma together with white blood cells and platelets. The main role of erythrocytes is the transport of oxygen and elimination of carbon dioxide, which significantly contributes to maintaining the acid–base balance. The life cycle of red blood cells is 120 days (Dobrovolskaia et al., 2013).

Hematopoiesis takes place in the red bone marrow through the production of the cytokine erythropoietin in the kidneys. Mature erythrocytes have a biconcave shape, which gives them flexibility and allows easy penetration through capillaries. A characteristic feature is the absence of mitochondria and, in adult cells, the absence of a nucleus (Koleva et al., 2020). Due to the influence of various physical factors, the membrane of erythrocytes is destabilized and hemoglobin is subsequently released. Such hemolysis can occur, for example, even with pressure changes. It is caused by the formation of neocytes caused by hypoxia during a sudden change from hypoxia to normoxia (Song et al., 2021; Riso et al., 2014). Hemolysis is also caused by other changes in the environment, such as changes in pH, changes in osmotic pressure, changes in surface tension, and so on.

Dexamethasone is a glucocorticosteroid that is used as an antiphlogistic for noninfectious inflammation in ophthalmology. They encountered the preparation of such eye drops as part of the magistral preparation (individual compounding) in various pharmacies to replace the then temporarily unavailable mass-produced eye drops with dexamethasone in a concentration of 0.1%. In our work, we focused on the preparation of eye drops with the active substance dexamethasone for the preparation of suspension eye drops or disodium dexamethasone phosphate for the preparation of solution eye drops.

We also observed the drops’ properties after adding the gel-forming substance, chitosan. The goal was to find a suitable ratio of excipients, so that the drops meet the requirements of the pharmacopeia, and to roughly evaluate irritation of the eye drops on erythrocytes by spectrophotometric measurement of the amount of hemoglobin released by hemolysis compared to mass-produced Unidexa drops.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

The materials and their manufacture information are as follows.

Active ingredient:

Dexamethasone Ph.Eur. 9.0., Dr. Kulich Pharma, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic b. n. NUD181203,

Dexamethasoni sodium phosphas, Fagron, Olomouc, Czech Republic, b. n. 21L03-BO6-217001

Excipients:

Sodium chloride (NaCl), Centralchem s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Chitosan low molecular weight (LMW), SIGMA-ALDRICH CHEMIE, USA

Carbetopencecinium bromide – Septonex, Supplier: PharmDr. Jozef Valúch

Lactic acid, SKLOCHEM-AGROEKOLAB, Zvolen, Slovak Republic Water for injections, Department of Galenic Pharmacy, FaF UK, Bratislava

Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), Centralchem s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Reference eye drops Unidexa 0.1%, Unimed Pharma, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, b. n. 3002214

Biological material:

Capillary blood of a healthy volunteer

Used devices:

pH meter, VWR® pHenomenal®, pH 1100L, CHROMSERVIS, Czech Republic

Spectrophotometer, Helios, CHROMSPEC Slovakia

Rotary viscometer, Anton Paar, Rheolab QC, Austria

Analytical scales OHAUS PIONEER, Transfer Multisort Elektronik Sp. z o.o., Łódź, Poland

Laboratory scales RADWAG WTC 600, Radwag Slovakia

Preparation of eye drops

Eye drops were prepared with a composition shown in Tables 1 and 2 at room temperature. As presented in Tables 3 and 4, chitosan was dissolved in water for injection with lactic acid at 80°C, and after cooling to room temperature, the acidity was adjusted by adding sodium hydroxide.

Eye drops A composition.

Dexamethasone0.05 g
Sodium chloride0.399 g
Carbethopendecinium bromide2.5 g
Water for injectionsad 50.0 g

Eye drops C composition.

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate0.1 g
Sodium chloride0.799 g
Carbethopendecinium bromide1.08 g
Water for injectionsad 100.0 g

Eye drops B composition (with chitosan).

Dexamethasone0.05 g
Chitosan LMW0.05 g
Lactic acid 80%0.5 g
Water for injectionsad 50.0 g
Sodium hydroxideq.s.

Eye drops D composition (with chitosan).

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate0.1 g
Chitosan LMW0.1 g
Lactic acid 80%1.0 g
Water for injectionsad 100.0 g
Sodium hydroxideq.s.
Assessment of eye drops

We measured the pH values, density (pycnometrically), and their surface tension (stalagmometrically) of the prepared eye drops and also of the reference Unidexa eye drops. In Table 5 are shown the averages of six measurements for each parameter.

Measured pH values of eye drops, the density of eye drops (pycnometrically), and their surface tension (stalagmometrically) – an average of six measurements.

Eye dropspHDensity (g cm−3)Surface tension (N m−1)
A6.6261.008870.9313
B (Ch)5.8780.995370.5043
C7.4001.005935.0392
D (Ch)5.8001.003063.3394
Unidexa 0.1%6.7571.009436.9939

Viscosity and flow properties of all samples measured with an Anton Paar rotational viscometer are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

The viscosity of eye drops A, B, C, D and Unidexa depending on torque (n = 3).

To compare the irritability (due to the different tonicity of the solutions), solutions containing sodium chloride with different concentrations were prepared, in which, just as in the prepared eye drops A, B, C, D and reference eye drops Unidexa, possible hemolysis was monitored. The composition of solutions of sodium chloride prepared with different concentrations as well as a suspension of red blood cells is shown in Table 6.

Compositions of solutions for monitoring hemolysis.

Composition of solutions (ml)The concentration of NaCl solutions (%)
1.0%0.9%0.8%0.7%0.6%0.5%0.4%0.3%0.2%0.1%
1% NaCl solution4.54.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50
Water for injections00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5
RBC suspension0.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5

After storing the mixtures of sodium chloride solutions or prepared eye drops and reference eye drops Unidexa with RBC suspension in the refrigerator for 24 h, the rate of hemolysis was monitored (see Fig. 2). The amount of released hemoglobin due to hemolysis was determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of λ = 550 nm (see Figs 3 and 4).

Figure 2.

Hemolysis in different NaCl solutions.

Figure 3.

Absorbance of different NaCl solutions at 550 nm.

Figure 4.

Absorbance of different eye drops at 550 nm.

DISCUSSION

The preparation of medicines for an individual patient (compounding) is always a certain insurance in the event of a failure of mass-produced medicines, the quality of which is usually higher than in magistral preparation. This was also confirmed in our experiment. When replacing the insufficient mass-produced product containing 0.1% dexamethasone in pharmacies, either dexamethasone itself was available for individual preparation, or in some pharmacies, they used a water-soluble salt of dexamethasone (dexamethasone sodium phosphate). Therefore, we included the preparation of suspension eye drops and solution eye drops in the experiment. After previous experiences with the use of chitosan as a viscosity-increasing substance, which at the same time affects irritation (sensitivity), we also included chitosan in the formulation of eye drops B and D at a concentration of 0.1%. When evaluating viscosity, the presence of chitosan showed an increase in viscosity, but differences were also seen when comparing suspension and solution eye drops, which had lower viscosity and other flow properties. The highest viscosity was found in the reference eye drops. Since we used only 0.1% concentration for chitosan, we can also consider a higher concentration (up to 0.2%), which would bring us closer to the viscosity of the mass-produced product. RBC Hemolysis Test is considered a method in which the excellent results obtained correspond to the results of the Draize test (Nóbrega et al., 2012). When evaluating irritability by monitoring the hemolysis of a suspension of erythrocytes obtained from a healthy volunteer, we observed both the effect of the type of preparation (suspension or solution) and the effect of viscosity, including the presence of chitosan, on irritation. The influence of pH was not manifested, apparently because the acidity was always in the euacidic region.

CONCLUSION

Based on the knowledge obtained, when preparing magistral eye drops with dexamethasone or its soluble salt, it is necessary to consider both isotonicity and viscosity.

Figure 1.

The viscosity of eye drops A, B, C, D and Unidexa depending on torque (n = 3).
The viscosity of eye drops A, B, C, D and Unidexa depending on torque (n = 3).

Figure 2.

Hemolysis in different NaCl solutions.
Hemolysis in different NaCl solutions.

Figure 3.

Absorbance of different NaCl solutions at 550 nm.
Absorbance of different NaCl solutions at 550 nm.

Figure 4.

Absorbance of different eye drops at 550 nm.
Absorbance of different eye drops at 550 nm.

Eye drops A composition.

Dexamethasone 0.05 g
Sodium chloride 0.399 g
Carbethopendecinium bromide 2.5 g
Water for injections ad 50.0 g

Compositions of solutions for monitoring hemolysis.

Composition of solutions (ml) The concentration of NaCl solutions (%)
1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1%
1% NaCl solution 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Water for injections 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
RBC suspension 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Measured pH values of eye drops, the density of eye drops (pycnometrically), and their surface tension (stalagmometrically) – an average of six measurements.

Eye drops pH Density (g cm−3) Surface tension (N m−1)
A 6.626 1.0088 70.9313
B (Ch) 5.878 0.9953 70.5043
C 7.400 1.0059 35.0392
D (Ch) 5.800 1.0030 63.3394
Unidexa 0.1% 6.757 1.0094 36.9939

Eye drops C composition.

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate 0.1 g
Sodium chloride 0.799 g
Carbethopendecinium bromide 1.08 g
Water for injections ad 100.0 g

Eye drops B composition (with chitosan).

Dexamethasone 0.05 g
Chitosan LMW 0.05 g
Lactic acid 80% 0.5 g
Water for injections ad 50.0 g
Sodium hydroxide q.s.

Eye drops D composition (with chitosan).

Dexamethasone sodium phosphate 0.1 g
Chitosan LMW 0.1 g
Lactic acid 80% 1.0 g
Water for injections ad 100.0 g
Sodium hydroxide q.s.

Alonso JM, Sánchez A. The potential of chitosan in ocular drug delivery. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2003;55:1451–1463. AlonsoJM SánchezA The potential of chitosan in ocular drug delivery Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2003 55 1451 1463 Search in Google Scholar

Bouwman-Boer Y, Fenton-May V, Le Brun P. Practical Pharmaceutics. An International Guideline for the Preparation, Care and Use of Medicinal Products. Switzerland: KNMP and Springer International Publishing; 2015. (eBook). Bouwman-BoerY Fenton-MayV Le BrunP Practical Pharmaceutics. An International Guideline for the Preparation, Care and Use of Medicinal Products Switzerland KNMP and Springer International Publishing 2015 (eBook). Search in Google Scholar

Casati S, Zuang V, Whelan M. EURL EVCAM Recommendation on the use of non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing. Publications Office of the European Union [online] 2017. ISBN: 978-92-79-67786-1 (online), 978-92-79-75244-5 (ePub). Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/eurl-ecvam-recommendation-use-non-animal-approaches-skin-sensitisation-testing CasatiS ZuangV WhelanM EURL EVCAM Recommendation on the use of non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing Publications Office of the European Union [online] 2017. ISBN: 978-92-79-67786-1 (online), 978-92-79-75244-5 (ePub). Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/eurl-ecvam-recommendation-use-non-animal-approaches-skin-sensitisation-testing Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. (2013). Handbook of Immunological Properties of Engineered Nanomaterials - 7.2 Erythrocyte Structure and Function. World Scientific. Retrieved from DobrovolskaiaMA McNeilSE 2013 Handbook of Immunological Properties of Engineered Nanomaterials - 7.2 Erythrocyte Structure and Function World Scientific Retrieved from Search in Google Scholar

https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00C24XJ3/handbook-immunological/erythrocyte-structure https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00C24XJ3/handbook-immunological/erythrocyte-structure Search in Google Scholar

Felt O et al. Topical use of chitosan in ophthalmology: tolerance assessment and evaluation of precorneal retention. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1999;180:185–193. FeltO Topical use of chitosan in ophthalmology: tolerance assessment and evaluation of precorneal retention International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1999 180 185 193 Search in Google Scholar

Hosseinnajad M, Jafari SM. Evaluation of different factors affecting antimicrobial properties of chitosan. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. [online]. 2016;85:467–475. [cit. 2016-02-17]. ISSN 0141-8130. Dostupné na: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014181301630023X HosseinnajadM JafariSM Evaluation of different factors affecting antimicrobial properties of chitosan International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. [online] 2016 85 467 475 [cit. 2016-02-17]. ISSN 0141-8130. Dostupné na: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014181301630023X Search in Google Scholar

Koleva L et al. Erythrocytes as Carriers: From Drug Delivery to Biosensors. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12030276 KolevaL Erythrocytes as Carriers: From Drug Delivery to Biosensors Pharmaceutics 2020 12 276 https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12030276 Search in Google Scholar

Lagarto A et al. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro [online]. 2006;20(4):529–533, [cit. 2017-04-22]. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.001. Dostupné z: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0887233305002183 LagartoA Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test Toxicology in Vitro [online] 2006 20 4 529 533 [cit. 2017-04-22]. 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.001 Dostupné z: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0887233305002183 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Matušová D, Truplová E. Chitosan v topických prípravkoch. Ceska Slov Farm. 2007;56(3):141–145. MatušováD TruplováE Chitosan v topických prípravkoch Ceska Slov Farm 2007 56 3 141 145 Search in Google Scholar

Nóbrega AM et al. Determination of eye irritation potential of low-irritant products: comparison of in vitro results with the in vivo draize rabbit test. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2012;55(3):381–388. NóbregaAM Determination of eye irritation potential of low-irritant products: comparison of in vitro results with the in vivo draize rabbit test Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2012 55 3 381 388 Search in Google Scholar

Risso A, Ciana A, Achilli C, Antonutto G, Minetti G. Neocytolysis: none, one or many? A reappraisal and future perspectives. Front Physiol. 2014;5:54. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00054. PMID: 24592241; PMCID: PMC3924315. RissoA CianaA AchilliC AntonuttoG MinettiG Neocytolysis: none, one or many? A reappraisal and future perspectives Front Physiol 2014 5 54 10.3389/fphys.2014.00054 24592241 PMC3924315 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Scott L et al. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. Toxicology in vitro: an international journal published in association with BIBRA. [online] 2010;24(1):1–9, [cit. 2016-02-03]. ScottL A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches Toxicology in vitro: an international journal published in association with BIBRA. [online] 2010 24 1 1 9 [cit. 2016-02-03]. Search in Google Scholar

Song J, Christensen RD, Thiagarajan P, Prchal JT. Does neocytolysis exist after descent from high altitude? Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2021;233(3):e13713. doi: 10.1111/apha.13713. Epub 2021 Jul 14. PMID: 34228882. SongJ ChristensenRD ThiagarajanP PrchalJT Does neocytolysis exist after descent from high altitude? Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2021 233 3 e13713 10.1111/apha.13713 Epub 2021 Jul 14. 34228882 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tichý M. Experimental toxicology in silico. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005; 149 (2):217–219. TichýM Experimental toxicology in silico Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2005 149 2 217 219 Search in Google Scholar

Vitková Z, Herdová P, Vitko A. Farmakokinetika a farmakodynamika z pohľadu farmaceutickej technológie (prístup in silico). Bratislava: Felia; 2016. VitkováZ HerdováP VitkoA Farmakokinetika a farmakodynamika z pohľadu farmaceutickej technológie (prístup in silico) Bratislava Felia 2016 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD