Open Access

The Effect of Sulphoraphane on Brain Glucose Uptake during Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Newborn Rats

S. Kapoor

S. Kapoor

  • Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of SciencesBratislava, Slovak Republic
  • Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of SciencesPrague, Czech Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kapoor, S.
, 
D. Kala

D. Kala

Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of SciencesPrague, Czech Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kala, D.
, 
J. Svoboda

J. Svoboda

Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of SciencesPrague, Czech Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Svoboda, J.
, 
Z. Brnoliakova

Z. Brnoliakova

Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of SciencesBratislava, Slovak Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Brnoliakova, Z.
 and 
J. Otahal

J. Otahal

Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of SciencesPrague, Czech Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Otahal, J.
  
Nov 25, 2021
The Effect of Sulphoraphane on Brain Glucose Uptake during Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in Newborn Rats's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Article Category: Special Issue Article
Published Online: Nov 25, 2021
Page range: 136 - 138
Received: Aug 04, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/afpuc-2021-0013
Keywords
© 2021 S. Kapoor et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Contralateral ratio of 18F-FDG activity after 24 hr (A), 1 week (B), 5 weeks (C) after HIE. ANOVA statistics: data were expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) *P<0.05 HIE+SFN and HIE vs SHAM+SFN; (B) ***P<0.001 HIE+SFN and HIE and SHAM vs SHAM+SFN; (C) *P<0.05 SHAM+SFN and HIE vs SHAM ; # # P<0.01 HIE+SFN vs HIE.
Contralateral ratio of 18F-FDG activity after 24 hr (A), 1 week (B), 5 weeks (C) after HIE. ANOVA statistics: data were expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) *P<0.05 HIE+SFN and HIE vs SHAM+SFN; (B) ***P<0.001 HIE+SFN and HIE and SHAM vs SHAM+SFN; (C) *P<0.05 SHAM+SFN and HIE vs SHAM ; # # P<0.01 HIE+SFN vs HIE.
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Pharmacy, Pharmacy, other
Journal RSS Feed