[
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B. & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). A billion-dollar donation: Estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6, 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boston, J. (2017). Governing for the future: Designing democratic institutions for a better tomorrow. Emerald Group Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropper, M. L., Freeman, M. C., Groom, B. & Pizer, W. A. (2014). Declining discount rates. American Economic Review, 104(5), 538–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunne, S. & Pedersen, M. (2023). Refusing busyness. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 23(2), 211–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Folbre, N. (2020). The rise and decline of patriarchal systems. Verso.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Future Generations Commissioner for Wales. (2021). The Future Generations report 2020: at a glance. Office of the Future Generations Commissioner for Wales. https://www.futuregenerations.wales/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/At-A-Glance-FG-Report.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grove, J. (2022, September 8). British Academy trials awarding research grants by lottery. Times Higher Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herbert, D. L., Barnett, A. G. & Graves, N. (2013). Australia’s grant system wastes time. Nature, 495(7441), 314. doi:10.1038/495314d
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, J. & Murphy, M. P. (Eds.). (2021). Policy analysis in Ireland. Policy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ismail, S., Farrands, A. & Wooding, S. (2009). Evaluating grant peer review in the health sciences: A review of the literature. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR742.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, T. (2021). Post growth: Life after capitalism. Polity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Link, A. N., Swann, C. A. & Bozeman, B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363–74. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthews, D. (2017, October 10). Is ‘universal basic income’ a better option than research grants? Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/universal-basic-income-better-option-research-grants
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myth. Demos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mulgan, G. (2014). Innovation in the public sector: How can public organisations better create, improve and adapt? Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/innovation_in_the_public_sector-_how_can_public_organisations_better_create_improve_and_adapt_0.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Strengthening policy development in the public sector in Ireland. doi:10.1787/6724d155-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (2021). Towards a strategic foresight system in Ireland: OECD policy brief. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/1cb62-towards-a-strategic-foresight-system-in-ireland-oecd-policy-brief/?
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pomey, M.-P., Morgan, S., Church, J., Forest, P.-G., Lavis, J. N., McIntosh, T., Smith, N., Petrela, J., Martin, E. & Dobson, S. (2010). Do provincial drug benefit initiatives create an effective policy lab? The evidence from Canada. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 35(5), 705–42. doi:10.1215/03616878-2010-025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, K. S. (2020). The Ministry for the Future. Orbit.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runciman, D. (2021, November 16). Votes for children! Why we should lower the voting age to six. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/nov/16/reconstruction-after-covid-votes-for-children-age-six-david-runciman
]Search in Google Scholar
