1. bookVolume 71 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Assessment of different diagnostic methods for the identification of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows with pathological puerperium and their reliability to conceive

Published Online: 30 Dec 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 71 (2021) - Issue 4 (December 2021)
Page range: 462 - 476
Accepted: 30 Nov 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of study was to evaluate different methods for subclinical endometritis (SCE) diagnoses and their accuracy to predict pregnancy. The study was performed on 51 postpartum cross breed dairy cows with pathological puerperium. Artificial insemination (AI) was done in spontaneous estrus. Endometrium samples were taken by cytotape (CT), cervical mucus (CM) samples by Metricheck and smears for crystallization degree were obtained at AI day. Blood serum samples for progesterone (P4) concentration determination were taken at AI day and 17 days later. Cows were examined by ultrasound 35 days after AI to confirm pregnancy. Percent (%) of polymorphnuclear leukocytes (PMNs) taken by CT were expressed by ROC curve (with cut-off point set at 1%). Out of the total of 51 cows involved in the study, 13.73% true positive and 41.17% true negative cows were found (54.90%). The content of CM sampled with Metricheck was altered in 11 cows (21.57%), and one of them was pregnant (1.96%). An average macroscopic CM value for pregnant cows was 0.06±0.24 vs. 0.39±0.79 for non-pregnant (p<0.05). An average value of CM crystallization in pregnant cows was 2.50±1.04 vs. 1.85±1.15 in non-pregnant (p<0.05). P4 concentration was not statistically different at AI day, but was statistically significantly higher 17 days later in pregnant cows (p = 0.002). CT alterations may be a reliable diagnostic tool for SCE diagnosis, while macroscopic CM alterations may be used for CE detection. P4 determination is beneficial in pregnancy diagnosis while CM crystallization degree is helpful in determination of best time for AI.

Keywords

1. Kaufmann TB, Drillich M, Tenhagen BA, Forderung D, Heuwieser W: Prevalence of bovine subclinical endometritis 4h after insemination and its effects on first service conception rate. Theriogenology 2009, 71(2):385-391.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.00518801562 Search in Google Scholar

2. Diaz-Lundahl S, Garmo RT, Gillund P, Klem TB, Waldmann A, Krogenæs AK: Prevalence, risk factors, and effects on fertility of cytological endometritis at the time of insemination in Norwegian Red cows. J Dairy Sci 2021, 104(6):6961-6974.10.3168/jds.2020-1921133741149 Search in Google Scholar

3. McDougall S, Macaulay R, Compton C: Association between endometritis diagnosis using a novel intravaginal device and reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2007, 99(1-2):9-23.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.03.01716630700 Search in Google Scholar

4. Kasimanickam R, Duffield TF, Foster RA, Gartley CJ, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Johnson WH. Endometrial cytology and ultrasonography for the detection of subclinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology 2004, 62(1-2):9-23.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.03.00115159097 Search in Google Scholar

5. Sheldon, IM, Owens SE: Postpartum uterine infection and endometritis in dairy cattle. Anim Reprod 2017,14 (3):622-62910.21451/1984-3143-AR1006 Search in Google Scholar

6. Pascottini OB, Hostens M, Dini P, Van Eetvelde M, Vercauteren P, Opsomer G: Prevalence of cytological endometritis and effect on pregnancy outcomes at the time of insemination in nulliparous dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2016, 99(11):9051-9056.10.3168/jds.2016-1134827592429 Search in Google Scholar

7. Wagener K, Gabler C, Drillich M. A review of the ongoing discussion about definition, diagnosis and pathomechanism of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017, 94:21-30.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.00528407857 Search in Google Scholar

8. Arias LAQ, Fernández MV, González JJB, López MB, Herradón PG, Martínez AIP: Subclinical endometritis in dairy cattle. in: Payan-Carreira R. New Insights Into Theriogenology. Intech 2018, 79-97 Search in Google Scholar

9. Pascottini OB, Dini P, Hostens M, Ducatelle R, Opsomer G: A novel cytologic sampling technique to diagnose subclinical endometritis and comparison of staining methods for endometrial cytology samples in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2015, 84(8):1438-1446.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.03226300274 Search in Google Scholar

10. Gilbert RO, Shin ST, Guard CL, Erb HN, Frajblat M: Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology 2005, 64(9):1879-1888.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.02215961149 Search in Google Scholar

11. Barlund CS, Carruthers TD, Waldner CL, Palmer CW: A comparison of diagnostic techniques for postpartum endometritis in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2008, 69(6):714-723.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.00518242670 Search in Google Scholar

12. Kumar P, Purohit GN, Mehta JS: Diagnosis of endometritis in cows using Metricheck, uterine cytology and ultrasonography and efficacy of different treatments. Veterinary Practitioner 2013, 14 (2): 351-354 Search in Google Scholar

13. Pascottini OB, Hostens M, Sys P, Vercauteren P, Opsomer G: Cytological endometritis at artificial insemination in dairy cows: Prevalence and effect on pregnancy outcome. J Dairy Sci 2017a,100(1):588-597.10.3168/jds.2016-11529 Search in Google Scholar

14. Pascottini OB, Hostens M, Sys P, Vercauteren P, Opsomer G: Risk factors associated with cytological endometritis diagnosed at artificial insemination in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017b, 92:1-5.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

15. Pleticha S, Drillich M, Heuwieser W: Evaluation of the Metricheck device and the gloved hand for the diagnosis of clinical endometritis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92(11):5429-5435.10.3168/jds.2009-2117 Search in Google Scholar

16. Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO: Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology 2006, 65(8):1516-1530.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.021 Search in Google Scholar

17. Cortés ME, González F, Vigil P. Crystallization of Bovine Cervical Mucus at Oestrus: An Update. Rev Med Vet. 2014, 28: 103-116. Search in Google Scholar

18. López-Gatius F, Labérnia J, Santolaria P, Rutllant J, López-Béjar M: The relationship of the rheological behavior of the cervical fluid at the time of insemination to the conception rate in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1997, 48(5):865-871.10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00307-5 Search in Google Scholar

19. Wiltbank, M, Souza, A, Carvalho, P, Cunha, A, Giordano, J, Fricke, P, Diskin, M: Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal 2014, 8(S1), 70-81.10.1017/S175173111400058524703103 Search in Google Scholar

20. Bishnoi BL, Vyas KK, Dwaraknath PK: Note on spinnbarkeit and crystallization pattern of bovine cervical mucus during oestrus. Indian J Anim Sci 1982, 52(6): 438-440 Search in Google Scholar

21. Sheldon IM, Noakes DE: Comparison of three treatments for bovine endometritis. Vet Rec 1998,142:575–579.10.1136/vr.142.21.5759634707 Search in Google Scholar

22. Ramirez-Garzon, O, Soares Magalhaes, R, Satake, N, Hill, J, Jimenez, C, Holland, MK, McGowan, M: Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle. Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI 2021, 11, n. pag.10.3390/ani11061683822817234198740 Search in Google Scholar

23. Plöntzke J, Madoz LV, De la Sota RL, Drillich M, Heuwieser W: Subclinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in grazing dairy cattle in Argentina. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 122(1-2):52-57.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.00620727691 Search in Google Scholar

24. Prunner I, Wagener K, Pothmann H, Ehling-Schulz M, Drillich M: Risk factors for uterine diseases on small- and medium-sized dairy farms determined by clinical, bacteriological, and cytological examinations. Theriogenology 2014, 82(6):857-865.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.06.01525066047 Search in Google Scholar

25. Moreno-Oliva P, Montaldo-Valdenegro H, García-Ortiz C, Hernández-Cerón J: Serum progesterone concentrations at the insemination time and pregnancy rate in dairy cows, AbanicoVet 2016, 6(2):22-29. Search in Google Scholar

26. Purschke S: Effects of suprabasal progesterone levels and negative energy balance on estrous activity and fertility in dairy cows. Inaugural Dissertation, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Clinic of Reproductive Medicine, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

27. Verma KK, Prasad S, Kumaresan A, Mohanty TK, Layek SS, Patbandha TK, Chand S: Characterization of physico-chemical properties of cervical mucus in relation to parity and conception rate in Murrah buffaloes, Veterinary World 2014, 7(7): 467-47110.14202/vetworld.2014.467-471 Search in Google Scholar

28. Båge R: Conception rates after AI in Swedish red and white dairy heifers: relationship with progesterone concentrations at AI. Reprod Domest Anim 2003, 38(3):199-203.10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00426.x12753553 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo