Environmental and Performance Assessment of Protective Outer Layers for Paper-Based Building Envelopes

[1] Latka, J. F. (2017). Paper in architecture Research by design, engineering and prototyping. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment (Vol. 7). A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment. Retrieved from https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/1875 LatkaJ. F. 2017 Paper in architecture Research by design, engineering and prototyping. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment 7 A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment Retrieved from https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/abe/article/view/1875 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Diarte, J., & Shaffer, M. (2021). Cardboard Architecture. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 18(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.17831/ENQARCC.V18I1.1103 DiarteJ. ShafferM. 2021 Cardboard Architecture Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research 18 1 58 65 https://doi.org/10.17831/ENQARCC.V18I1.1103 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Packaging waste statistics – Statistics Explained. (n.d.). Retrieved December 23, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Packaging_waste_statistics&oldid=559603 Packaging waste statistics – Statistics Explained (n.d.) Retrieved December 23, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Packaging_waste_statistics&oldid=559603 Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Paper Recycling Council (EPRC). (2020). European Declaration on Paper Recycling, 1–8. European Paper Recycling Council (EPRC) 2020 European Declaration on Paper Recycling 1 8 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Beurden, H. van. (2015). Paper breakthroughs. European answers to societal challenges. Amsterdam. BeurdenH. van 2015 Paper breakthroughs. European answers to societal challenges Amsterdam Search in Google Scholar

[6] Eekhout, M., Verheijen, F., & Visser, R. (2008). Cardboard in Architecture. IOS Press. Retrieved from http://files/271/Eekhout – 2008 – Cardboard in Architecture.pdf EekhoutM. VerheijenF. VisserR 2008 Cardboard in Architecture IOS Press Retrieved from http://files/271/Eekhout – 2008 – Cardboard in Architecture.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kumar, G., & Raheja, G. (2016). Design Determinants of Building Envelope for Sustainable Built Environment: A Review. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v3.n2.127 KumarG. RahejaG 2016 Design Determinants of Building Envelope for Sustainable Built Environment: A Review International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 3 2 https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v3.n2.127 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jasiolek, A., Latka, J., & Brzezicki, M. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Paper-based Building Envelopes for Semi-permanent Architecture: Original Proposals and Suggestions for Designers. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 9(2), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5510 JasiolekA. LatkaJ. BrzezickiM. 2021 Comparative Analysis of Paper-based Building Envelopes for Semi-permanent Architecture: Original Proposals and Suggestions for Designers Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 9 2 47 72 https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5510 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cripps, A. (2004). Cardboard as a construction material: a case study. Building Research & Information, 32(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210410001686273 CrippsA. 2004 Cardboard as a construction material: a case study Building Research & Information 32 3 207 219 https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210410001686273 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Meer, C. van der. (2013). Developing the W-house, the world’s first house made from wrapped cardboard. Delft University of Technology. MeerC. van der 2013 Developing the W-house, the world’s first house made from wrapped cardboard Delft University of Technology Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wolf, A., Rebecca, B., Nihat, K., Ulrich, K., Wilfinger, M., Bach, R., … Knaack, U. (2021). A Full Performance Paper House. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 9(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.1.5533 WolfA. RebeccaB. NihatK. UlrichK. WilfingerM. BachR. KnaackU. 2021 A Full Performance Paper House Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 9 1 252 https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.1.5533 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vaccari, M., & Sassi, P. (2015). Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Building Material. In IASS WORKING GROUPS 12 + 18 International Colloquium 2015 “Bio-based and Bio-inspired Environmentally Compatible Structures.” Retrieved from http://files/279/Vaccari i Sassi – 2015 – Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Buildin.pdf VaccariM. SassiP 2015 Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Building Material In IASS WORKING GROUPS 12 + 18 International Colloquium 2015 “Bio-based and Bio-inspired Environmentally Compatible Structures.” Retrieved from http://files/279/Vaccari i Sassi – 2015 – Environmental Assessment of Cardboard as a Buildin.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ayan, O. (2009). Cardboard in architectural technology and structural engineering a conceptual approach to cardboard buildings in architecture. ETH Zurich. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006080626 AyanO 2009 Cardboard in architectural technology and structural engineering a conceptual approach to cardboard buildings in architecture ETH Zurich Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006080626 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bach, R. (2020). Papier Fassaden : Entwicklung konstruktiver Prinzipien für Fassaden aus Papierwerkstoffen mit Fokus auf Brandschutz, Wärmedämmung, Feuchteschutz und ökologische Eigenschaften. Aachen University. BachR 2020 Papier Fassaden : Entwicklung konstruktiver Prinzipien für Fassaden aus Papierwerkstoffen mit Fokus auf Brandschutz, Wärmedämmung, Feuchteschutz und ökologische Eigenschaften Aachen University Search in Google Scholar

[15] Qin, P., Yi, D., Xing, J., Zhou, M., & Hao, J. (2021). Study on flame retardancy of ammonium polyphosphate/montmorillonite nanocompound coated cellulose paper and its application as surface flame retarded treatment for polypropylene. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10427-1 QinP. YiD. XingJ. ZhouM. HaoJ 2021 Study on flame retardancy of ammonium polyphosphate/montmorillonite nanocompound coated cellulose paper and its application as surface flame retarded treatment for polypropylene Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 1 11 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10427-1 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Si, Y., & Guo, Z. (2016). Eco-friendly functionalized superhydrophobic recycled paper with enhanced flame-retardancy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 477, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.044 SiY. GuoZ. 2016 Eco-friendly functionalized superhydrophobic recycled paper with enhanced flame-retardancy Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 477 74 82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.044 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Jasiolek, A., Latka, J., & Brzezicki, M. (2021). Biodegradable methods of impregnating paperboard for its use as a building material. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(5), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1920640 JasiolekA. LatkaJ. BrzezickiM. 2021 Biodegradable methods of impregnating paperboard for its use as a building material International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 14 5 1081 1089 https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1920640 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kuusipalo, J. (2000). PHB/V in extrusion coating of paper and paperboard: Part I: Study of functional properties. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 8(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010124205584 KuusipaloJ. 2000 PHB/V in extrusion coating of paper and paperboard: Part I: Study of functional properties Journal of Polymers and the Environment 8 1 39 47 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010124205584 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Bach, R., & Hildebrand, L. (2018). A comparative overview of tools for environmental assessment of materials, components and buildings. In Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools (pp. 143–158). BachR. HildebrandL 2018 A comparative overview of tools for environmental assessment of materials, components and buildings In Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools 143 158 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hildebrand, L., & Hollberg, A. (2018). Methodology for Assessing Environmental Quality of Materials and Construction. In S. Kosanovic, T. Klein, T. Konstantinou, & L. Hildebrand (Eds.), Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools (pp. 121–142). TU Delft Open. https://doi.org/978-94-6366-032-7 HildebrandL. HollbergA 2018 Methodology for Assessing Environmental Quality of Materials and Construction In KosanovicS. KleinT. KonstantinouT. HildebrandL. (Eds.), Sustainable and resilient building design: approaches, methods and tools 121 142 TU Delft Open https://doi.org/978-94-6366-032-7 Search in Google Scholar

[21] ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework (2006). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework 2006 Search in Google Scholar

[22] ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines (2006). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines 2006 Search in Google Scholar

[23] EN 15804:2012+A2:2019. Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products. (2019). EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations – Core rules for the product category of construction products 2019 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H. J., Doka, G., Dones, R., Heck, T., … Spielmann, M. (2005). The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1 FrischknechtR. JungbluthN. AlthausH. J. DokaG. DonesR. HeckT. SpielmannM. 2005 The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10 1 3 9 https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Hischier, R., Althaus, H. J., & Werner, F. (2004). Developments in Wood and Packaging Materials Life Cycle Inventories in ecoinvent (9 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2005 10:1, 10(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1065/LCA2004.11.181.6 HischierR. AlthausH. J. WernerF. 2004 Developments in Wood and Packaging Materials Life Cycle Inventories in ecoinvent (9 pp) The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2005 10:1 10 1 50 58 https://doi.org/10.1065/LCA2004.11.181.6 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., & Matthews, D. (2014). Life cycle assessment: Quantitative approach for decisions that matter. Retrieved from https://www.lcatextbook.com/ MatthewsH. S. HendricksonC. T. MatthewsD 2014 Life cycle assessment: Quantitative approach for decisions that matter Retrieved from https://www.lcatextbook.com/ Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2018). Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217 IsmaeelW. S. E. 2018 Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems Journal of Cleaner Production 182 783 793 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.217 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Bare, J. C., Hofstetter, P., Pennington, D. W., & de Haes, H. A. U. (2000). Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978665 BareJ. C. HofstetterP. PenningtonD. W. de HaesH. A. U. 2000 Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5 6 319 326 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02978665 Search in Google Scholar