Diagnostic tests to assess balance in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of their validity and reliability

[1] Chou CH, Hwang CL, Wu YT. Effect of exercise on physical function, daily living activities, and quality of life in the frail older adults: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:237–44. ChouCH HwangCL WuYT Effect of exercise on physical function, daily living activities, and quality of life in the frail older adults: a meta-analysis Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 237 44 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.042 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ. 2010; 44:75–84. WulfG SheaC LewthwaiteR Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors Med Educ 2010 44 75 84 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x Search in Google Scholar

[3] Winter DA, Patla AE, Ishac M, Gage WH. Motor mechanisms of balance during quiet standing. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13:49–56. WinterDA PatlaAE IshacM GageWH Motor mechanisms of balance during quiet standing J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003 13 49 56 10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00085-8 Search in Google Scholar

[4] de Kam D, Roelofs JMB, Bruijnes AKBD, Geurts ACH, Weerdesteyn V. The next step in understanding impaired reactive balance control in people with stroke: the role of defective early automatic postural responses. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31:708–16. de KamD RoelofsJMB BruijnesAKBD GeurtsACH WeerdesteynV The next step in understanding impaired reactive balance control in people with stroke: the role of defective early automatic postural responses Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017 31 708 16 10.1177/1545968317718267571415928691582 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Alves J, Santos A. Virtual reality therapy for balance training in aging and neurological disorders. J Adv Neurosci Res. 2016; 3:1–8. AlvesJ SantosA Virtual reality therapy for balance training in aging and neurological disorders J Adv Neurosci Res 2016 3 1 8 10.15379/2409-3564.2016.03.01.01 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hardin EC, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ. Ambulation and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013; 24:355–70. HardinEC KobeticR TrioloRJ Ambulation and spinal cord injury Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2013 24 355 70 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.11.00223598268 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jannings W, Pryor J. The experiences and needs of persons with spinal cord injury who can walk. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34:1820–6. JanningsW PryorJ The experiences and needs of persons with spinal cord injury who can walk Disabil Rehabil 2012 34 1820 6 10.3109/09638288.2012.66512622423597 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, Aydın A, Öneş K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015; 6:8–16. NasK YazmalarL ŞahV AydınA ÖneşK Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries World J Orthop 2015 6 8 16 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.8430379325621206 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Harkema SJ, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz DJ, Edgerton VR, Behrman AL. Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training–based rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93:1508–17. HarkemaSJ Schmidt-ReadM LorenzDJ EdgertonVR BehrmanAL Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training–based rehabilitation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 1508 17 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.02421777905 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Emerich L, Parsons KC, Stein A. Competent care for persons with spinal cord injury and dysfunction in acute inpatient rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012; 18:149–66. EmerichL ParsonsKC SteinA Competent care for persons with spinal cord injury and dysfunction in acute inpatient rehabilitation Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012 18 149 66 10.1310/sci1802-149358476423460762 Search in Google Scholar

[11] van Hedel HJA, Dietz V. Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010; 28:123–34. van HedelHJA DietzV Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury Restor Neurol Neurosci 2010 28 123 34 10.3233/RNN-2010-050820086289 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46:239–48. ManciniM HorakFB The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010 46 239 48 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Arora T, Oates A, Lynd K, Musselman KE. Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 43:10–23. AroraT OatesA LyndK MusselmanKE Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: a systematic review J Spinal Cord Med 2020 43 10 23 10.1080/10790268.2018.1481692700670729869951 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Chaudhry H, Bukiet B, Ji Z, Findley T. Measurement of balance in computer posturography: comparison of methods—a brief review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011; 15:82–91. ChaudhryH BukietB JiZ FindleyT Measurement of balance in computer posturography: comparison of methods—a brief review J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011 15 82 91 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.03.00321147423 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010; 31:307–10. ClarkRA BryantAL PuaY McCroryP BennellK HuntM Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance Gait Posture 2010 31 307 10 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.01220005112 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alexander MS, Anderson KD, Biering-Sorensen F, Blight AR, Brannon R, Bryce TN, et al. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord. 2009; 47:582–91. AlexanderMS AndersonKD Biering-SorensenF BlightAR BrannonR BryceTN Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions Spinal Cord 2009 47 582 91 10.1038/sc.2009.18272268719381157 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ; SCIRE Research Team. A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46:246–54. LamT NoonanVK EngJJ SCIRE Research Team A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2008 46 246 54 10.1038/sj.sc.3102134309563117923844 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, Thombs BD, Hyde CJ, Macaskill P, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ. 2020; 370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632 SalamehJP BossuytPM McGrathTA ThombsBD HydeCJ MacaskillP Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist BMJ 2020 370 m2632 10.1136/bmj.m263232816740 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Terwee CB. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27:1171–9. MokkinkLB de VetHCW PrinsenCAC PatrickDL AlonsoJ BouterLM TerweeCB COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Qual Life Res 2018 27 1171 9 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4589155229260445 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27:1147–57. PrinsenCAC MokkinkLB BouterLM AlonsoJ PatrickDL de VetHCW TerweeCB COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures Qual Life Res 2018 27 1147 57 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3589156829435801 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Adegoke BOA, Ogwumike OO, Olatemiju A. Dynamic balance and level of lesion in spinal cord injured patients. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002; 31:357–60. AdegokeBOA OgwumikeOO OlatemijuA Dynamic balance and level of lesion in spinal cord injured patients Afr J Med Med Sci 2002 31 357 60 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Boswell-Ruys CL, Sturnieks DL, Harvey LA, Sherrington C, Middleton JW, Lord SR. Validity and reliability of assessment tools for measuring unsupported sitting in people with a spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:1571–77. Boswell-RuysCL SturnieksDL HarveyLA SherringtonC MiddletonJW LordSR Validity and reliability of assessment tools for measuring unsupported sitting in people with a spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 1571 77 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.01619735786 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Field-Fote EC, Ray SS. Seated reach distance and trunk excursion accurately reflect dynamic postural control in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48:745–49. Field-FoteEC RaySS Seated reach distance and trunk excursion accurately reflect dynamic postural control in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2010 48 745 49 10.1038/sc.2010.11289427920157313 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 1998; 78:128–33. LynchSM LeahyP BarkerSP Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury Phys Ther 1998 78 128 33 10.1093/ptj/78.2.1289474105 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sprigle S, Maurer C, Holowka M. Development of valid and reliable measures of postural stability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30:40–49. SprigleS MaurerC HolowkaM Development of valid and reliable measures of postural stability J Spinal Cord Med 2007 30 40 49 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753913203200617385269 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Sprigle S, Wootten M, Sawacha Z, Thielman G. Relationships among cushion type, backrest height, seated posture, and reach of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003; 26:236–43. SprigleS WoottenM SawachaZ ThielmanG Relationships among cushion type, backrest height, seated posture, and reach of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury J Spinal Cord Med 2003 26 236 43 10.1080/10790268.2003.1175369014997965 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Srisim K, Saengsuwan J, Amatachaya S. Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38:439–45. SrisimK SaengsuwanJ AmatachayaS Functional assessments for predicting a risk of multiple falls in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury J Spinal Cord Med 2015 38 439 45 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000186461219924621036 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wirz M, Muller R, Bastiaenen C. Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24:70–7. WirzM MullerR BastiaenenC Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 70 7 10.1177/154596830934105919675123 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Iosa M, Molinari M. Reliability, validity, and effectiveness of center of pressure parameters in assessing stabilometric platform in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: A serial cross-sectional study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:86–98. TamburellaF ScivolettoG IosaM MolinariM Reliability, validity, and effectiveness of center of pressure parameters in assessing stabilometric platform in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: A serial cross-sectional study J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014 11 86 98 10.1186/1743-0003-11-86403115424886312 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Jørgensen V, Opheim A, Halvarsson A, Franzén E, Roaldsen KS. Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for assessing balance in ambulatory people with spinal cord injury: validation study. Phys Ther. 2017; 97:677–87. JørgensenV OpheimA HalvarssonA FranzénE RoaldsenKS Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for assessing balance in ambulatory people with spinal cord injury: validation study Phys Ther 2017 97 677 87 10.1093/ptj/pzx03028371940 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Lemay JF, Nadeau S. Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 245–50. LemayJF NadeauS Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale Spinal Cord 2010 48 245 50 10.1038/sc.2009.11919773797 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Chan K, Unger J, Lee JW, Johnston G, Constand M, Masani K, Musselman KE. Quantifying balance control after spinal cord injury: reliability and validity of the mini-BESTest. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42(suppl 1):141–8. ChanK UngerJ LeeJW JohnstonG ConstandM MasaniK MusselmanKE Quantifying balance control after spinal cord injury: reliability and validity of the mini-BESTest J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 42 suppl 1 141 8 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647930678122431573459 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Roy A, Higgins J, Nadeau S. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the mini-BESTest in adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation setting. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021: 37:126–34. RoyA HigginsJ NadeauS Reliability and minimal detectable change of the mini-BESTest in adults with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation setting Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 37 126 34 10.1080/09593985.2019.162216131156010 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Abou L, Sung JH, Sosnoff JJ, Rice LA. Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 43:846–53. AbouL SungJH SosnoffJJ RiceLA Reliability and validity of the function in sitting test among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury J Spinal Cord Med 2020 43 846 53 10.1080/10790268.2019.1605749780109330998421 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Jørgensen V, Elfving B, Opheim A. Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49:838–43. JørgensenV ElfvingB OpheimA Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2011 49 838 43 10.1038/sc.2011.921358720 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wadhwa G, Aikat R. Development, validity and reliability of the ‘Sitting Balance Measure’ (SBM) in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54:319–23. WadhwaG AikatR Development, validity and reliability of the ‘Sitting Balance Measure’ (SBM) in spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2016 54 319 23 10.1038/sc.2015.14826458968 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21:1371–1383. AndersonKD Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population J Neurotrauma 2004 21 1371 1383 10.1089/neu.2004.21.137115672628 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Amatachaya S, Wannapakhe J, Arrayawichanon P, Siritarathiwat W, Wattanapun P. Functional abilities, incidences of complications and falls of patients with spinal cord injury 6 months after discharge. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49:520–4. AmatachayaS WannapakheJ ArrayawichanonP SiritarathiwatW WattanapunP Functional abilities, incidences of complications and falls of patients with spinal cord injury 6 months after discharge Spinal Cord 2011 49 520 4 10.1038/sc.2010.16321151192 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kirshblum SC, Priebe MM, Ho CH, Scelza WM, Chiodo AE, Wuermser LA. Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(3 Suppl 1):S62–70. KirshblumSC PriebeMM HoCH ScelzaWM ChiodoAE WuermserLA Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 88 3 Suppl 1 S62 70 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.00317321851 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006; 23:571–85. BarbeauH NadeauS GarneauC Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury J Neurotrauma 2006 23 571 85 10.1089/neu.2006.23.57116629638 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Molinari M. Balance training improves static stability and gait in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury subjects: a pilot study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013; 49:353–64. TamburellaF ScivolettoG MolinariM Balance training improves static stability and gait in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury subjects: a pilot study Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013 49 353 64 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Nardone A, Schieppati M. The role of instrumental assessment of balance in clinical decision making. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46:221–37. NardoneA SchieppatiM The role of instrumental assessment of balance in clinical decision making Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010 46 221 37 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Yelnik A, Bonan I. Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008; 38:439–45. YelnikA BonanI Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders Neurophysiol Clin 2008 38 439 45 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.00819026963 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Noohu MM, Dey AB, Hussain ME. Relevance of balance measurement tools and balance training for fall prevention in older adults. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 5:31–5. NoohuMM DeyAB HussainME Relevance of balance measurement tools and balance training for fall prevention in older adults J Clin Gerontol Geriatr 2014 5 31 5 10.1016/j.jcgg.2013.05.002 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Sibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB. Clinical balance assessment: perceptions of commonly-used standardized measures and current practices among physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-33 SibleyKM StrausSE InnessEL SalbachNM JaglalSB Clinical balance assessment: perceptions of commonly-used standardized measures and current practices among physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada Implement Sci. 2013 8 33 10.1186/1748-5908-8-33360683623510277 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Park E-Y, Kim W-H. Correlation of Berg balance scale and functional reach test. Phys Ther Korea. 2007; 14:28–34. ParkE-Y KimW-H Correlation of Berg balance scale and functional reach test Phys Ther Korea 2007 14 28 34 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Moore JL, Potter K, Blankshain K, Kaplan SL, O’Dwyer LC, Sullivan JE. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018; 42:174–220. MooreJL PotterK BlankshainK KaplanSL O’DwyerLC SullivanJE A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline J Neurol Phys Ther 2018 42 174 220 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000229602360629901487 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Tyson SF, Connell LA. How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:824–40. TysonSF ConnellLA How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions Clin Rehabil 2009 23 824 40 10.1177/026921550933501819656816 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Page MJ, Shamseer L, Tricco AC. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. Syst Rev. 2018; 7:32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4 PageMJ ShamseerL TriccoAC Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting Syst Rev. 2018 7 32 10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4581970929463298 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar