This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hope Growers of America. 2018. USA hops 2018 statistical report. Hop Grow. Am., available at: https://www.usahops.org/img/blog_pdf/168.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Bridge, J. and Page, S. L. J. 1980. Estimation of root-knot nematode infestation levels on roots using a rating chart. International Journal of Pest Management 26:296–298.BridgeJ. and PageS. L. J.1980. Estimation of root-knot nematode infestation levels on roots using a rating chart. 26:296–298.Search in Google Scholar
Brito, J. A., Subbotin, S. A., Desaeger, J., Achinelly, F. and Qiu, S. 2018. First report of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) infecting hops (Humulus lupulus) in Florida, USA. Journal of Nematology 50:1–2.BritoJ. A.SubbotinS. A.DesaegerJ.AchinellyF. and QiuS.2018. First report of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) infecting hops (Humulus lupulus) in Florida, USA. 50:1–2.10.21307/jofnem-2018-040Search in Google Scholar
Cobb, S. G. 1962. First record of hop cyst nematode (Heterodera humuli Filipjev, 1934) in the United States. Plant Disease Report 46:541.CobbS. G.1962. First record of hop cyst nematode (Heterodera humuli Filipjev, 1934) in the United States. 46:541.Search in Google Scholar
De Grisse, A. and Gillard, A. 1963. Morphology and biology of hop cyst eelworm (Heterodera humuli Filipjev 1934). Nematologica 9:41–48.De GrisseA. and GillardA.1963. Morphology and biology of hop cyst eelworm (Heterodera humuli Filipjev 1934). 9:41–48.10.1163/187529263X00106Search in Google Scholar
Floyd, R., Abebe, E., Papert, A. and Blaxter, M. 2002. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Molecular Ecology 11:839–850.FloydR.AbebeE.PapertA. and BlaxterM.2002. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. 11:839–850.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01485.xSearch in Google Scholar
Foot, M. A. and Wood, F. H. 1982. Potato rot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor (Nematoda: Tylenchida), infecting hops in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 10:443–446.FootM. A. and WoodF. H.1982. Potato rot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor (Nematoda: Tylenchida), infecting hops in New Zealand. 10:443–446.10.1080/03015521.1982.10427916Search in Google Scholar
Forge, T. A. and Kimpinski, J. 2007. “Nematodes”, in Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G. (Eds), Soil sampling and methods of analysis 2nd ed, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 415–425.ForgeT. A. and KimpinskiJ.2007. “Nematodes”, in CarterM. R. and GregorichE. G. (Eds), 2nd ed, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 415–425.Search in Google Scholar
Garcia, M. and Rich, J. R. 1985. Root-knot nematodes in North-Central Florida soybean fields. Nematropica 15:43–48.GarciaM. and RichJ. R.1985. Root-knot nematodes in North-Central Florida soybean fields. 15:43–48.Search in Google Scholar
Hafez, S. L., Golden, A. M., Rashid, R. and Handoo, Z. 1992. Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with crops in Idaho and Eastern Oregon. Nematropica 22:193–204.HafezS. L.GoldenA. M.RashidR. and HandooZ.1992. Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with crops in Idaho and Eastern Oregon. 22:193–204.Search in Google Scholar
Holterman, M., Van Der Wurff, A., Van Den Elsen, S., Van Megen, H., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O, Bakker, J. and Helder, J. 2006. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:1792–1800.HoltermanM.Van Der WurffA.Van Den ElsenS.Van MegenH.BongersT.HolovachovOBakkerJ. and HelderJ.2006. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. 23:1792–1800.10.1093/molbev/msl044Search in Google Scholar
Hussey, R. S. and Barker, K. R. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula for Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Disease Report 57:1025–1028.HusseyR. S. and BarkerK. R.1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula for Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. 57:1025–1028.Search in Google Scholar
Maggenti, A. R. 1962. Hot water treatment of hop rhizomes for nematode control. California Agriculture October, 11–12.MaggentiA. R.1962. Hot water treatment of hop rhizomes for nematode control. October, 11–12.Search in Google Scholar
Mahaffee, W., Pethybridge, S. and Gent, D. H. 2009. Compendium of hop diseases and pests American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.MahaffeeW.PethybridgeS. and GentD. H.2009. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, B. J., Smith, R. M. and Chen, J. 2016. Growth, strobile yield, and quality of four Humulus lupulus varieties cultivated in a protected open-sided greenhouse structure. HortScience 51:838–842.PearsonB. J.SmithR. M. and ChenJ.2016. Growth, strobile yield, and quality of four Humulus lupulus varieties cultivated in a protected open-sided greenhouse structure. 51:838–842.10.21273/HORTSCI.51.7.838Search in Google Scholar
Pelerents, C., Heungens, A., Dejonckheere, W. and Barbez, D. 1983. Control of nematodes in hops. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent 48:75–77.PelerentsC.HeungensA.DejonckheereW. and BarbezD.1983. Control of nematodes in hops. 48:75–77.Search in Google Scholar
Porazinska, D. L., Duncan, L. W., McSorley, R. and Graham, J. H. 1999. Nematode communities as indicators of status and processes of a soil ecosystem influenced by agricultural management practices. Applied Soil Ecology 13:69–86.PorazinskaD. L.DuncanL. W.McSorleyR. and GrahamJ. H.1999. Nematode communities as indicators of status and processes of a soil ecosystem influenced by agricultural management practices. 13:69–86.10.1016/S0929-1393(99)00018-9Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, S. 1973. Steiner’s guide to American hops Hopsteiner, New York, NY.SteinerS.1973. Hopsteiner, New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, S. F., Benedict, C. A., Darby, H., Hoagland, L. A., Simonson, P., Robert Sirrine, J. and Murphy, K. M. 2011. Challenges and opportunities for organic hop production in the United States. Agronomy Journal 103:1645–1654.TurnerS. F.BenedictC. A.DarbyH.HoaglandL. A.SimonsonP.Robert SirrineJ. and MurphyK. M.2011. Challenges and opportunities for organic hop production in the United States. 103:1645–1654.10.2134/agronj2011.0131Search in Google Scholar
USDA-NASS 2018. National hop report USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC.USDA-NASS2018. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
Watson, T. T., Nelson, L. M., Neilsen, D., Neilsen, G. H. and Forge, T. A. 2017. Soil amendments influence Pratylenchus penetrans populations, beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms, and growth of newly planted sweet cherry. Applied Soil Ecology 117–118:212–220.WatsonT. T.NelsonL. M.NeilsenD.NeilsenG. H. and ForgeT. A.2017. Soil amendments influence Pratylenchus penetrans populations, beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms, and growth of newly planted sweet cherry. 117–118:212–220.10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.04.014Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, H. and Zheng-Li, L. 1989. Histological studies on the root-knot nematodes nonresistsant and resistant root apex of Humulus lupulus L. Acta Botanica Sinica 31:576–580.ZhangH. and Zheng-LiL.1989. Histological studies on the root-knot nematodes nonresistsant and resistant root apex of Humulus lupulus L. 31:576–580.Search in Google Scholar