Open Access

Movement of seed- and soil-applied fluopyram in soil columns

Travis R. Faske

Travis R. Faske

Division of Agriculture, University of ArkansasUSA
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Faske, Travis R.
 and 
Katherine Brown

Katherine Brown

Division of Agriculture, University of ArkansasUSA
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Brown, Katherine
  
Jul 31, 2019
Movement of seed- and soil-applied fluopyram in soil columns's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Article Category: Arts & Humanities
Published Online: Jul 31, 2019
Page range: 1 - 8
Received: Dec 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-045
Keywords
© 2019 Travis R. Faske et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides detected at three depths in sand (A) and sandy loam (B) filled 6-mm-diameter soil columns drenched with a base rate of water infiltration. The base rate of water infiltration was 20.0 mm/d. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides detected at three depths in sand (A) and sandy loam (B) filled 6-mm-diameter soil columns drenched with a base rate of water infiltration. The base rate of water infiltration was 20.0 mm/d. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 2:

Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides detected at three depths in sand filled 6-mm-diameter soil column drenched with a slower rate of water infiltration (A) and a 12-mm-diameter soil column drenched with a base rate of water infiltration (B). The base rate was 20.0 mm/d whereas the slower rate was 0.7 mm/d over a 30-day period. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides detected at three depths in sand filled 6-mm-diameter soil column drenched with a slower rate of water infiltration (A) and a 12-mm-diameter soil column drenched with a base rate of water infiltration (B). The base rate was 20.0 mm/d whereas the slower rate was 0.7 mm/d over a 30-day period. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 3:

Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides from cotton (A) and soybean (B) treated seed detected at three depths in sand filled soil columns drenched with a base rate of water infiltration. The base rate of water infiltration was 20.0 mm/d. A 6-mm-diam. column was used for cotton seed, while a 12-mm-diam. column was used for soybean seed. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Percent dead Meloidogyne incognita after 24 hr exposure to nematicides from cotton (A) and soybean (B) treated seed detected at three depths in sand filled soil columns drenched with a base rate of water infiltration. The base rate of water infiltration was 20.0 mm/d. A 6-mm-diam. column was used for cotton seed, while a 12-mm-diam. column was used for soybean seed. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
1 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Life Sciences, other
Journal RSS Feed