Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)
Open Access
Dog Distraction Quantified
Peter McKenzie
Peter McKenzie
| Jan 01, 2010
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jan 01, 2010
Page range:
9 - 26
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/ijom-2010-002
© 2010 Peter McKenzie published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Table 1.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.
Figure 1.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by calendar year.
Figure 2.
Number of dogs associated with aftercare issue (N = 280).
Figure 3.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2000 to 2003.
Figure 4.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2004 to 2006.
Figure 5.
Major aftercare issues associated with dogs placed in calendar years 2007 to 2008.
Table 2.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by region.
Table 3.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog breed.
Table 4.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by dog sex and user gender (Golden Retrievers excluded) n = 243.
Table 5.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by breeder quantity of dogs.
Table 6.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser experience.
Table 7.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raiser numbers.
Table 8.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training intake assessment score.
Figure 6.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by assessment score.
Table 9.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by puppy raising variable and assessment score.
Table 10.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by supervising instructor.
Table 11.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by batch type.
Table 12.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by training type.
Table 13.
Percentage of dogs with dog distraction referrals by program instructor.
Table 14.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user age.
Table 15.
Observed frequencies of dog distraction referrals by user experience.