<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of the present study was to characterise the chemical and mechanical properties of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials.</p></sec><sec><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Four thermoplastic materials were tested: Clear Aligner (Scheu-Dental), ACE and A+ (Dentsply), and Invisalign (Align Technology). Eight appliances were fabricated from each material and a small portion from each was analysed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. The appliances were cut and, following metallographic grinding and polishing, were subjected to instrumented indentation testing (IIT) employing a Vickers indenter. Martens Hardness (HM), Indentation Modulus (E<sub>IT</sub>), Elastic to Total Work Ratio (elastic index (η<sub>IT</sub>)) and Indentation Creep (C<sub>IT</sub>) were determined according to ISO 14577-1. The mean values of the mechanical properties were statistically analysed by one way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer multiple comparison test at a = 0.05.</p></sec><sec><h3>Results</h3><p>ATR-FTIR analysis identified that Invisalign was a polyurethane-based material, whereas the others were based on polyester, polyethylene glycol terephthalate (PETG). Invisalign showed higher hardness and modulus values, a slightly higher brittleness and lesser creep resistance compared with the PETG-based products.</p></sec><sec><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The materials tested showed significant differences in their chemical structure and mechanical properties and therefore differences in their clinical behaviour are anticipated.</p></sec></abstract>

AimThe aim of the present study was to characterise the chemical and mechanical properties of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials.Materials and methodsFour thermoplastic materials were tested: Clear Aligner (Scheu-Dental), ACE and A+ (Dentsply), and Invisalign (Align Technology). Eight appliances were fabricated from each material and a small portion from each was analysed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. The appliances were cut and, following metallographic grinding and polishing, were subjected to instrumented indentation testing (IIT) employing a Vickers indenter. Martens Hardness (HM), Indentation Modulus (EIT), Elastic to Total Work Ratio (elastic index (ηIT)) and Indentation Creep (CIT) were determined according to ISO 14577-1. The mean values of the mechanical properties were statistically analysed by one way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer multiple comparison test at a = 0.05.ResultsATR-FTIR analysis identified that Invisalign was a polyurethane-based material, whereas the others were based on polyester, polyethylene glycol terephthalate (PETG). Invisalign showed higher hardness and modulus values, a slightly higher brittleness and lesser creep resistance compared with the PETG-based products.ConclusionsThe materials tested showed significant differences in their chemical structure and mechanical properties and therefore differences in their clinical behaviour are anticipated.

Chemical and mechanical characteristics of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AimThe aim of the present study was to characterise the chemical and mechanical properties of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials.Materials and...

Chemical and mechanical characteristics of contemporary thermoplastic orthodontic materials

Published Online: Aug 15, 2021

Page range: 165 - 170

Received: Mar 01, 2015

Accepted: Sep 01, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-151

© 2015 Alexandros Alexandropoulos et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.