CURRENT CHALLENGES OF VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS CONCERNING THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF STAPHYLOCOCCI TO ANTIBIOTICS

1.Adkins P.R.F., Middleton J.R., Calcutt M.J., Stewart G.C., Fox L.K.: Species Identification and Strain Typing of Staphylococcus agnetis and Staphylococcus hyicus Isolates from Bovine Milk by Use of a Novel Multiplex PCR Assay and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1778–1788 (2017)10.1128/JCM.02239-16544253428330895Search in Google Scholar

2.Al-Rubaye A.A., Couger M.B., Ojha S., Pummill J.F., Koon J.A., Wideman R.F. Jr, Rhoads D.D.: Genome Analysis of Staphylococcus agnetis, an Agent of Lameness in Broiler Chickens. PLoS One, 25, e0143336 (2015)10.1371/journal.pone.0143336465963626606420Search in Google Scholar

3.American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA): Judicious therapeutic use of antimicrobials, https://www.avma.org/KB/ Policies/Pages/Judicious-Therapeutic-Use-of-Antimicrobials. aspx (14.02.2018)Search in Google Scholar

4.Angeletti S.: Matrix assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in clinical microbiology. J. Microbiol. Methods. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.003 (2017)10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.00327613479Search in Google Scholar

5.Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice. https://www.ddd.dk/sektioner/familiedyr/antibiotikavejledning/ Documents/AntibioticGuidelines%20-%20v1.4_jun15.pdf (27.03.2018)Search in Google Scholar

6.Barreiro J.R., Gonçalves J.L., Braga P.A., Dibbern A.G., Eberlin M.N., Veiga Dos Santos M.: Non-culture-based identification of mastitis-causing bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 2928–2934 (2017)10.3168/jds.2016-1174128161160Search in Google Scholar

7.Becker K., Heilmann C., Peters G.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 870–926 (2014)Search in Google Scholar

8.Bemis D.A., Jones R.D., Videla R., Kania S.A.: Evaluation of cefoxitin disk diffusion breakpoint for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 24, 964–967 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

9.Bond R., Loeffler A.: What’s happened to Staphylococcus intermedius? Taxonomic revision and emergence of multi-drug resistance. J. Small Anim. Pract. 53, 147–54 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

10.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. 3^rd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI Supplement; VET01S (2015).Search in Google Scholar

11.Coates R., Moran J., Horsburgh M.J.: Staphylococci: colonizers and pathogens of human skin. Future Microbiol. 9, 75–91 (2014)10.2217/fmb.13.14524328382Search in Google Scholar

12.Cornaglia G., Courcol R., Herrmann J.-L., Kahlmeter G., Peigue-Lafeuille H., Vila J.: European Manual of Clinical Microbiology. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Societe Francaise de Microbiologie, 2012Search in Google Scholar

13.Couto N., Monchique C., Belas A., Marques C., Gama L.T., Pomba C:. Trends and molecular mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in clinical staphylococci isolated from companion animals over a 16 year period. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 71, 1479–1487 (2016)10.1093/jac/dkw02926944924Search in Google Scholar

14.Damborg P., Moodley A., Aalbæk B., Ventrella G., Dos Santos T.P., Guardabassi L.: High genotypic diversity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from canine infections in Denmark. BMC Vet. Res. 12: 131. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0756-y (2016)10.1186/s12917-016-0756-y492829727357502Search in Google Scholar

15.Dargatz D.A., Erdman M.M., Harris B.: A survey of methods used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 29, 669–675 (2017)Search in Google Scholar

16.Elbehiry A., Al-Dubaib M., Marzouk E., Osman S., Edrees H.: Performance of MALDI biotyper compared with Vitek™ 2 compact system for fast identification and discrimination of Staphylococcusspecies isolated from bovine mastitis. Microbiologyopen, 5, 1061–1070 (2016)10.1002/mbo3.389522144027364641Search in Google Scholar

17.El-Bouri K., Johnston S., Rees E., Thomas I., Bome-Mannathoko N., Jones C., Reid M., Ben-Ismaeil B., Davies A.R., Harris L.G., Mack D.: Comparison of bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and conventional diagnostic microbiology methods: agreement, speed and cost implications. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 69, 47–55 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

18.Ellington M.J., Woodford N. i wsp.: The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 23, 2–22 (2017)Search in Google Scholar

19.Europejski Komitet ds. Oznaczania Lekowrażliwości, European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, EUCAST, http://www.eucast.org (14.02.2018)Search in Google Scholar

20.Feng Y., Tian W., Lin D., Luo Q., Zhou Y., Yang T., Deng Y., Liu Y.H., Liu J.H.: Prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in pets from South China. Vet. Microbiol. 160, 517–524 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

21.Frank L.A., Loeffler A.: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: clinical challenge and treatment options. Vet. Dermatol. 23, 283–291 (2012)10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01047.x22486942Search in Google Scholar

22.Gordon N.C., Golubchik T. i wsp.: Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 1182–1191 (2014)Search in Google Scholar

23.Guardabassi L., Damborg P., Stamm I., Kopp P.A., Broens E.M., Toutain P.L.: ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology. Diagnostic microbiology in veterinary dermatology: present and future. Vet. Dermatol. 28, 146–e30 (2017)Search in Google Scholar

24.Guardabassi L., Prescott J.F.: Antimicrobial stewardship in small animal veterinary practice: from theory to practice. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 45, 361–376 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

25.Hauschild T., Stepanović S., Zakrzewska-Czerwińska J.: Staphylococcus stepanovicii sp. nov., a novel novobiocin-resistant oxidase-positive staphylococcal species isolated from wild small mammals. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 183–187 (2010)Search in Google Scholar

26.Hryniewicz W., Ozorowski T.: Szpitalna Polityka Antybiotykowa Propozycje dla polskich do szpitali. Narodowy Program Ochrony Antybiotyków, Warszawa 2011, http://www.antybiotyki.edu.pl/pdf/szpitalna/Szp-polit-antyb-MZ.pdf (14.02.2018)Search in Google Scholar

27.Huse H.K., Miller S.A., Chandrasekaran S., Hindler J.A., Lawhon S.D., Bemis D.A., Westblade L.F., Humphries R.M.: Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion and MIC Breakpoints Established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for Detection of mecA-Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e01653–17 (2018)Search in Google Scholar

28.Jorgensen J.H., Pfaller M.A., Carroll K.C., Funke G., Marie Louise Landry M.L., Richter S.S., Warnock D.W.: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 11th edition. American Society for Microbiology, 201510.1128/9781555817381Search in Google Scholar

29.Kadlec K., Schwarz S.: Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet. Dermatol. 23, 276–282 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

30.Kizerwetter-Świda M., Chrobak-Chmiel D., Rzewuska M., Antosiewicz A., Dolka B., Ledwoń A., Czujkowska A., Binek M.: Genetic characterization of coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from healthy pigeons. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 18, 627–634 (2015)Search in Google Scholar

31.Kizerwetter-Świda M., Chrobak-Chmiel D., Rzewuska M., Binek M.: Resistance of canine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains to pradofloxacin. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 28, 514–518 (2016)Search in Google Scholar

32.Kizerwetter-Świda M., Chrobak-Chmiel D., Rzewuska M., Binek M:. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius– trudno rozpo-znawalny patogen. Post. Mikrobiol. 54, 103–114 (2015)Search in Google Scholar

33.Kmieciak W., Szewczyk E.M.: Gatunki koagulazododatnie rodzaju Staphylococcus– taksonomia, chorobotwórczośćPost. Mikrobiol. 52, 233–244 (2017)Search in Google Scholar

34.Lazaris A., Coleman D.C., Kearns A.M., Pichon B., Kinnevey P.M., Earls M.R., Boyle B., O’Connell B., Brennan G.I., Shore A.C.: Novel multiresistance cfr plasmids in linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) from a hospital outbreak: co-location of cfr and optrA in VRE. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 3252–3257 (2017)10.1093/jac/dkx29228961986Search in Google Scholar

35.Matuschek E., Brown D. F., Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O255–O256 (2014)10.1111/1469-0691.1237324131428Search in Google Scholar

36.Morris D.O., Rook K.A., Shofer F.S., Rankin S.C.: Screening of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius, and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates obtained from small companion animals for antimicrobial resistance: a retrospective review of 749 isolates (2003–2004). Vet. Dermatol. 17, 332–227 (2006)Search in Google Scholar

37.Nováková D., Pantůcek R., Hubálek Z., Falsen E., Busse H.J., Schumann P., Sedlácek I.: Staphylococcus microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60, 566–573 (2010)Search in Google Scholar

38.Park J.Y., Fox L.K., Seo K.S., McGuire M.A., Park Y.H., Ruran-girwa F.R., Sischo W.M., Bohach G.A.: Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine intramammary infections. Vet. Microbiol. 147, 142–148 (2011)Search in Google Scholar

39.Poulsen L.L., Thøfner I., Bisgaard M., Olsen R.H., Christensen J.P., Christensen H.: Staphylococcus agnetis, a potential pathogen in broiler breeders. Vet. Microbiol. 212, 1–6 (2017)Search in Google Scholar

40.Pulido M.R., García-Quintanilla M., Martín-Peña R., Cisneros J.M., McConnell M.J.: Progress on the development of rapid methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68, 2710–2717 (2013)Search in Google Scholar

41.Rhoads D.D., Wang H., Karichu J., Richter S.S.: The presence of a single MALDI-TOF mass spectral peak predicts methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 86, 257–261 (2016)Search in Google Scholar

42.Riesen A., Perreten V.: Staphylococcus rostri sp. nov., a haemolytic bacterium isolated from the noses of healthy pigs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60, 2042–2047 (2010)10.1099/ijs.0.012443-019819995Search in Google Scholar

43.Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (WE) 1831/2003 z dnia 22 września 2003 r. w sprawie dodatków stosowanych w żywieniu zwierząt.Search in Google Scholar

44.Sader H.S., Jones R.N.: Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin potency trends (MIC creep) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in nine U.S. medical centers from 2002 to 2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 4127–4132 (2009)10.1128/AAC.00616-09276422419635961Search in Google Scholar

45.Sasaki T., Tsubakishita S., Tanaka Y., Sakusabe A., Ohtsuka M., Hirotaki S., Kawakami T., Fukata T., Hiramatsu K.: Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 765–769 (2010)Search in Google Scholar

46.Savini V., Di Giuseppe N., Fazii P., D’Amario C., D’Antonio D., Carretto E.: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius heterogeneously expresses the mecA gene. Vet. Microbiol. 165, 489–490 (2013)Search in Google Scholar

47.Savini V., Passeri C., Mancini G., Iuliani O., Marrollo R., Argentieri A.V., Fazii P., D’Antonio D., Carretto E.: Coagulase-positive staphylococci: my pet’s two faces. Res Microbiol. 164, 371–374 (2013)10.1016/j.resmic.2013.02.00423481095Search in Google Scholar

48.Silva M.B., Ferreira F.A., Garcia L.N., Silva-Carvalho M.C., Botelho L.A., Figueiredo A.M., Vieira-da-Motta O.: An evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine infections. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 27, 231–235 (2015)10.1177/104063871557329725680922Search in Google Scholar

49.Supré K., De Vliegher S., Cleenwerck I., Engelbeen K., Van Trappen S., Piepers S., Sampimon O.C., Zadoks R.N., De Vos P., Haesebrouck F.: Staphylococcus devriesei sp. nov., isolated from teat apices and milk of dairy cows. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60, 2739–2744 (2010)Search in Google Scholar

50.Swedish strategy to combat antibiotic resistance. http://www.government.se/contentassets/168838e186de455 ca7fe868bee92d209/swedish-strategy-to-combat-antibiotic-resistance.pdf (27.03.2018)Search in Google Scholar

51.Szczuka E., Makowska N., Kaznowski A.: Molekularne metody identyfikacji bakterii z rodzaju Staphylococcus. Post. Mikrobiol. 52, 211–218 (2013)Search in Google Scholar

52.Tagini F., Greub G.: Bacterial genome sequencing in clinical microbiology: a pathogen-oriented review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3024-6 (2017)10.1007/s10096-017-3024-6565372128639162Search in Google Scholar

53.Taponen S., Nykäsenoja S., Pohjanvirta T., Pitkälä A., Pyörälä S.: Species distribution and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitic milk. Acta Vet Scand. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-016-0193-8 (2016)10.1186/s13028-016-0193-8474439826852389Search in Google Scholar

54.Taponen S., Supré K., Piessens V., Van Coillie E., De Vliegher S., Koort J.M.: Staphylococcus agnetis sp. nov., a coagulase-variable species from bovine subclinical and mild clinical mastitis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 61–65 (2012)Search in Google Scholar

55.Tong S.Y, Giffard P.M. i wsp.: Novel staphylococcal species that form part of a Staphylococcus aureus-related complex: the non-pigmented Staphylococcus argenteus sp. nov. and the non-human primate-associated Staphylococcus schweitzeri sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 15–22 (2015)Search in Google Scholar

56.van Duijkeren E., Törneke K. i wsp.: Scientific Advisory Group on Antimicrobials (SAGAM). Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66, 2705–2714 (2011)Search in Google Scholar

57.Vanderhaeghen W., Piepers S., Leroy F., Van Coillie E., Haesebrouck F., De Vliegher S.: Identification, typing, ecology and epidemiology of coagulase negative staphylococci associated with ruminants. Vet . J. 203, 44–51 (2015)Search in Google Scholar

58.Weese J.S., Sykes J.E. i wsp.: Antimicrobial use guidelines for treatment of urinary tract disease in dogs and cats: antimicrobial guidelines working group of the international society for companion animal infectious diseases. Vet. Med. Int. DOI: 10.4061/2011/263768 (2011)10.4061/2011/263768313499221776346Search in Google Scholar

59.World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). Laboratory methodologies for bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. http://www.oie.int/en/international-standard-setting/ terrestrial-manual/access-online (14.02.2018)Search in Google Scholar

60.Wu M.T., Burnham C.A., Westblade L.F., Dien Bard J., Lawhon S.D., Wallace M.A., Stanley T., Burd E., Hindler J., Humphries R.M.: Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk and MIC Breakpoints for Prediction of Methicillin Resistance in Human and Veterinary Isolates of Staphylococcus intermediusGroup. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 535–542 (2016)Search in Google Scholar

61.Yossepowitch O., Dan M., Kutchinsky A., Gottesman T., Schwartz-Harari O.: A cost-saving algorithm for rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus and susceptibility to oxacillin directly from positive blood culture bottles by combined testing with BinaxNOW® S. aureus and Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 78, 352–355 (2014)10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.01.00124503507Search in Google Scholar