In deep space missions, a gravity assist trajectory is often used, which uses the gravity of a planet (or other celestial body) to alter the path and speed of a spacecraft. This technique allows to reach destinations which would not be accessible with current technology or to reach targets with significantly reduced propulsion requirements. Many spacecrafts such as Voyager, Galileo, and Cassini use the gravity assist technique to achieve their targets. The two Voyager spacecrafts provide a classic example. Voyager 2 launched in August 1977 took one G. A. from Jupiter, one from Saturn, later from Uranus, and then move up to Neptune and beyond. Galileo passed by Venus then twice by Earth, and finally go up to its path Jupiter. Cassini passed by Venus twice, then Earth, and finally Jupiter on the way to Saturn [1,2,3].
In a gravity assist trajectory, angular momentum is transferred from the orbiting planet to a spacecraft, while the value of it’s speed relative to planet is not changed during a gravity assist flyby, but it’s direction is changed. However, both value and direction of spacecraft’s speed relative to the sun are changed during a gravity assist flyby, due to the planet relative orbital velocity is added to the spacecraft’s velocity on its way out.
The application of a “multi-conic method” with differential correction was explored by Wilson and Howell [4] with applications to the Sun-Earth-Moon environment. Their work is based on the original multi-conic method, which approximates trajectory legs by considering separate perturbing influences. This method is somewhat of a compromise between patched conics and fully integrated trajectories. In another work, Marchand, Howell, and Wilson [6] utilized a multi-step correction process for obtaining trajectories in an n-body ephemeris model. This procedure begins with a “seed” trajectory, divides the trajectory into nodes, and performs differential correction on the states at the nodes to satisfy specified constraints in the n-body model. The design of a transfer trajectory combining Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) and gravity assist (GA) can be regarded as a general trajectory optimization problem [7]. The dynamics of the spacecraft is governed mainly by the gravity attraction of the Sun, when the spacecraft is outside the sphere of influence of a planet, and by the gravity attraction of the planet during a gravity assist maneuver. Low-thrust propulsion is then used to shape trajectory arcs between two subsequent encounters and to meet the best incoming conditions for a swing-by.
An interesting approach is to choice to direct collocation as demonstrated by Betts [8], who efficiently optimized a transfer trajectory to Mars combining low-thrust with two swing-bys of Venus. In this paper an original direct optimization approach has been used to design an optimal interplanetary trajectory. The proposed approach is characterized by a transcription of both states and controls by Finite Elements in Time (DFET) [9]. A set of additional parameters, not included among states and controls, are allowed and can be used for a combined optimization of both the trajectory and other quantities peculiar to the original optimal control problem (parametric optimization). In particular, in this paper, the orbital elements of each hyperbola are treated as additional parameters and opposite to the work of Betts, swing-by trajectories are not transcribed with collocation but using multiple shooting.
In this work we study the interplanetary trajectory of a spacecraft leaving Earth and making fly by with Mars in it’s destination to Jupiter. We introduced a simple and accessible algorithms for interplanetary trajectory planning that do not require gross simplifications and are able to find the required solution. The algorithms are implemented in Mathematica program, which allows for their straightforward use in an academic setting.
The complete trajectory has been divided into five different segments. Three of them are planetary segments around Earth, Mars and Jupiter, respectively, the other two are heliocentric elliptic orbits Fig. (1). The classical analysis of scales for interplanetary missions is adopted [5]. That is, since planetary radii are significantly smaller than planetary Spheres of influence (SoI), the limit of the (SoI) is considered (from the point of view of the planetary segments) to be located at infinity. On the other hand, from the perspective of the heliocentric trajectories Earth - Mars and Mars - Jupiter, the (SoI) are reduced to a point. Finally, using the method of patched conics, the five segments are joined to compose the complete trajectory.
A gravity assist maneuver is applied in an interplanetary trajectory to use of planet’s gravitational field and momentum in order to increase or decrease the spacecraft’s heliocentric orbital energy. In the planet centered reference frame of the patched conic method, the trajectory (unpowered gravity assist) does not change in orbital energy, but is simply redirected from entering
The heliocentric velocity of the spacecraft
Lambert’s problem is characterized by taking two position vectors
Calculations of Lambert problemslambert earth - Mars Lambert Mars -Jupiter -1.280952970127814 × 108 1.588109522284044 × 108 -7.873040871488884 × 107 -1.331196049556935 × 108 4241.23706297353500 -6690470.129802731 1.588109522284044 × 108 5.331461279416993 × 108 -1.3311960495569350 × 108 5.392020271071861 × 108 -6690470.12980273100 -9671957.471152349 Δ 1.054080811623402 × 107 Δ 8.25504364820473 × 107 1.32712428000 × 1011 1.32712428 × 1011 18.61716546638244600 30.823073404118684 -28.29950136444239000 4.934176592416298 -1.152116764359739900 -0.8994633203622276 21.7254264303175400 -5.888427200446674 13.84469939965363100 3.2105733597573787 0.013528429195021072 0.22569580208145187
The algorithm that is used is taken from Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications [10]. This algorithm utilizes the bisection method which provide a strong solution for a wide variety of transfer orbits. The formulation of this method begins with the
Where
The
Equating the corresponding equations in the two groups Eqs. (1) and Eqs. (2), we obtain
We get from Eq. (3)
Substituting with
We can write this equation more compactly by defining two auxiliary symbols, A and y as:
Using these definitions of A and y, Eqs. (7) and (8) may be written more compactly as
If we now solve for Δ
Using the auxiliary symbols A and y to write Eqs. (3 - 6) in the following simplified expressions:
Then the solution of Lambert problems yields the following relations:
In order to escape the gravitational pull of a planet, the spacecraft must travel a hyperbolic trajectory relative to the planet, arriving at it’s sphere of influence with a relative velocity
The heliocentric velocity of S/C
The latter is assumed to be equal to the spacecraft velocity relative to the Earth. In general it is
The impulse required to be given at the perigee of the hyperbolic orbit to transfer the spacecraft from the parking orbit to the escape hyperbolic orbit is given by
Clearly the direction of
We can obtain
The velocity at the perigee of the hyperbolic orbit is:
The speed of S/c in its circular parking orbit is given by
The orientation of the apse line of the hyperbola to the asymptotes of the hyperbolic trajectory measured by the angle, which can be obtained from the relation [5]
The results are summarized in the Table (2).
Escape from Earth at JD (Julian day No) of Δ 4.63635 3.986004415 × 105 6678.1363 1.36014 79262.1 .744807 7.72576 4.14313
Now after solving Lambert’s problem for earth - Mars trajectory and Mars, Jupiter trajectory we have
Then the heliocentric velocity of spacecraft at the SOI of Mars is
We take the direction of
We know that
Now we can calculate the hyperbolic orbital elements using the relation [5],
Then we can calculate the perigee of the hyperbolic fly by Mars, now the spacecraft out the SOI of Mars with the velocity
After that the spacecraft out from the SOI of Mars with heliocentric velocity is
which by it can complete it’s trajectory to reach the SOI of Jupiter. The results are summarized in Table (3).
Fly by Mars at JD (Julian day No) of Δ (km) Δ 8.58375 4.305 × 104 11968.6 21.4844 12539.3 21.2887 0.0931244 12.7049
A spacecraft arrives at the sphere of influence of the Jupiter with a hyperbolic excess velocity
Such that:
the goal’s mission is landing on Jupiter To achieve this goal we make the perigee of the hyperbola equal to the Jupiter radius (
Capture from Jupiter at JD (Julian day No) of Δ ( Δ 16.4086 1.26675 × 108 69911 1.14859 265842 62.3951 -62.3951
The problem of preliminary interplanetary design to outer planets has been studied using Gravity-assisted maneuvers techniques which have been introduced as a resource to get the required energy to reach far planets. Deep Space Maneuvers and impulses at the flyby periapsis have also been described as means to increase the degrees of freedom in the global trajectory design process. The method is applied to transfer trajectory from the Earth to planet Jupiter making flyby with Mars to gain an extra energy to reach to the target planet ( Jupiter). Lambert problem were used to find a solution for the position vectors from initial orbits in each transfer.