Comparing intrapartum ultrasound and clinical examination in the assessment of fetal head position in African women

1. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E: Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 915–920. Ponkey SE Cohen AP Heffner LJ Lieberman E : Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes . Obstet Gynecol 2003 ; 101 : 915 – 920 . 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00068-1 Search in Google Scholar

2. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C: Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 1027–1031. Fitzpatrick M McQuillan K O’Herlihy C : Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome . Obstet Gynecol 2001 ; 98 : 1027 – 1031 . 10.1097/00006250-200112000-00007 Search in Google Scholar

3. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB: Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 563–568. Cheng YW Shaffer BL Caughey AB : Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001 . J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med 2006 ; 19 : 563 – 568 . 10.1080/1476705060068248716966125 Search in Google Scholar

4. Pearl ML, Roberts JM, Laros RK, Hurd WW: Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Reprod Med 1993; 38: 955–961. Pearl ML Roberts JM Laros RK Hurd WW : Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity . J Reprod Med 1993 ; 38 : 955 – 961 . Search in Google Scholar

5. Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakua EK: The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound 2016; 24: 222–232. Wiafe YA Whitehead B Venables H Nakua EK : The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Ultrasound 2016 ; 24 : 222 – 232 . 10.1177/1742271X16673124509871027847537 Search in Google Scholar

6. Handa VL, Lockhart ME, Fielding JR, Bradley CS, Brubaker L, Cundiff GW et al.: Racial differences in pelvic anatomy by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 914–920. Handa VL Lockhart ME Fielding JR Bradley CS Brubaker L Cundiff GW et al. : Racial differences in pelvic anatomy by magnetic resonance imaging . Obstet Gynecol 2008 ; 111 : 914 – 920 . 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318169ce03259312818378751 Search in Google Scholar

7. Hoyte L, Thomas J, Foster RT, Shott S, Jakab M, Weidner AC: Racial differences in pelvic morphology among asymptomatic nulliparous women as seen on three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 2035–2040. Hoyte L Thomas J Foster RT Shott S Jakab M Weidner AC : Racial differences in pelvic morphology among asymptomatic nulliparous women as seen on three-dimensional magnetic resonance images . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 ; 193 : 2035 – 2040 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.06016325611 Search in Google Scholar

8. Betti L, Manica A: Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 285: 20181807. Betti L Manica A : Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured . Proc Biol Sci 2018 ; 285 : 20181807 . 10.1098/rspb.2018.1807623489430355714 Search in Google Scholar

9. Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK Jr, Caughey AB: Face presentation: predictors and delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 10–12. Shaffer BL Cheng YW Vargas JE Laros RK Jr Caughey AB : Face presentation: predictors and delivery route . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 ; 194 : 10 – 12 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.02916647888 Search in Google Scholar

10. Ahmad A, Webb SS, Early B, Sitch A, Khan K, MacArthur C: Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 176–182. Ahmad A Webb SS Early B Sitch A Khan K MacArthur C : Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 ; 43 : 176 – 182 . 10.1002/uog.1318923929533 Search in Google Scholar

11. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Barbera A, Eggebø TM, Mynbaev OA, Bochicchio M et al.: Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 520–526. Malvasi A Tinelli A Barbera A Eggebø TM Mynbaev OA Bochicchio M et al. : Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014 ; 27 : 520 – 526 . 10.3109/14767058.2013.82559823865738 Search in Google Scholar

12. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A: Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 59–63. Souka AP Haritos T Basayiannis K Noikokyri N Antsaklis A : Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003 ; 13 : 59 – 63 . 10.1080/jmf.13.1.59.6312710859 Search in Google Scholar

13. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 258–263. Sherer DM Miodovnik M Bradley KS Langer O : Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002 ; 19 : 258 – 263 . 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x11896947 Search in Google Scholar

14. Shetty J, Aahir V, Pandey D, Adiga P, Kamath A: Fetal head position during the first stage of labor: comparison between vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 314617. Shetty J Aahir V Pandey D Adiga P Kamath A : Fetal head position during the first stage of labor: comparison between vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound . ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014 ; 2014 : 314617 . 10.1155/2014/314617407677325006479 Search in Google Scholar

15. Choi SK, Park YG, Lee DH, Ko HS, Park IY, Shin JC: Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during labor for the prediction of labor dystocia and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 3988–3992. Choi SK Park YG Lee DH Ko HS Park IY Shin JC : Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during labor for the prediction of labor dystocia and perinatal outcomes . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016 ; 29 : 3988 – 3992 . 10.3109/14767058.2016.115225026948718 Search in Google Scholar

16. Blanc-Petitjean P, Le Ray C, Lepleux F, De La Calle A, Dreyfus M, Chantry AA: Factors affecting rotation of occiput posterior position during the first stage of labor. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2018; 47: 119–125. Blanc-Petitjean P Le Ray C Lepleux F De La Calle A Dreyfus M Chantry AA : Factors affecting rotation of occiput posterior position during the first stage of labor . J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2018 ; 47 : 119 – 125 . 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.00629294363 Search in Google Scholar