Evaluating Artificial Models of Cognition

Barandiaran, X. E., & Chemero, A. (2009). Animats in the modeling ecosystem. Adaptive Behavior, 17(4), 287-292.10.1177/1059712309340847Search in Google Scholar

Beer, R. D., &Williams, P. L. (2009). Animals and animats:Why not both iguanas? Adaptive Behavior, 17(4), 296-302.10.1177/1059712309340844Search in Google Scholar

Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles, experiments in synthetic psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon Press.10.1037/10037-000Search in Google Scholar

Cleeremans, A., & French, R. M. (1996). From chicken squawking to cognition: Levels of description and the computational approach in psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 36, 1-28.10.5334/pb.892Search in Google Scholar

Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299317.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, R. (1983). The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dawson, M. R. W. (2004). Minds and machines: Connectionism and psychological modeling. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470752999Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1981). Reflections on D. R. Hofstadter’s “The Turing Test: A coffeehouse conversation”. In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (Eds.), The mind’s I (pp. 69-95). New York: Bantam Books.Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88(1), 27-51.10.2307/2027085Search in Google Scholar

Eliasmith, C., Stewart, T. C., Choo, X., Bekolay, T., DeWolf, T., Tang, C., & Rasmussen, D. (2012). A large-scale model of the functioning brain. Science, 338(6111), 1202-1205. doi:10.1126/science.1225266.10.1126/science.1225266Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2010). Computational models as aids to better reasoning in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 329-335.10.1177/0963721410386677Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of psychology. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1967). Problems of computer simulation. Behavioral Science, 12(1), 59-67.10.1002/bs.3830120109Search in Google Scholar

Glennan, S. S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S342-S353.10.1086/341857Search in Google Scholar

Glymour, C. (1987). Android epistemology and the frame problem: Comments on Dennett’s “Cognitive wheels.” In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.), The robot’s dilemma: Frame problem in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 65-75). Norwood: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2008). Models and fictions in science. Philosophical Studies, 143(1), 101-116.10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2Search in Google Scholar

Hinton, G. E., & Nowlan, S. J. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems, 1, 495-502.Search in Google Scholar

Koehn, P. (2010). Statistical machine translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krohs, U. (2008). How digital computer simulations explain real-world processes. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22(3), 277-292.10.1080/02698590802567324Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S. (1993). The rewards and hazards of computer simulations. Psychological Science, 4(4) (July), 236-243.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00267.xSearch in Google Scholar

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421-431.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, A. (2012).Models, fictions, and realism: Two packages. Philosophy of Science, 79(5) (November 19), 738-748.10.1086/667992Search in Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. & PDP Research Group (Eds.) (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.10.1037/h0043158Search in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M. (2013). Explaining the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9339.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Montebelli, A., Lowe, R., Ieropoulos, I., Melhuish, C., Greenman, J., & Ziemke, T. (2010). Microbial fuel cell driven behavioral dynamics in robot simulations. In H. Fellermann et al. (Eds.), Artificial Life XII: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (pp. 749-756). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at https://mitp-web2.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/alife/0262290758chap133.pdf [Accessed November 10, 2011].Search in Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1963). The imitation of man by machine: The view that machines will think as man does reveals misunderstanding of the nature of human thought. Science, 139(3551): 193-197.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1960). A variety of intelligent learning in a general problem solver. In M. C. Yovits & S. Cameron (Eds.), Selforganizing systems: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary conference (pp. 153-189). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Larkin, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4) (July), 883-99.10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.883Search in Google Scholar

Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., & Bullock, S. (2000). Simulation models as opaque thought experiments. In M. Bedau, J. McCaskill, N. Packard & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), The Seventh International Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 497-506). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. F. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183(3) (March 11), 283-311. doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4.10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 23, 73-193.10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7Search in Google Scholar

Santos, D., Sangbae, K., Spenko, M., Parness, A., & Cutkosky, M. (2007). Directional adhesive structures for controlled climbing on smooth vertical surfaces. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1262-1267. IEEE.10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363158Search in Google Scholar

Sanz, R., & Hern´andez, C. (2010). Autonomy, intelligence and animat mesmerization. In C. Hern´andez, J. Gómez & R. Sanz (Eds.), From brains to systems: Preprints of the BICS 2010 conference on brain-inspired cognitive systems (pp. 256-270).Madrid. Preprint available at http://tierra.aslab.upm.es/events/BIC2010/documents/BICS-2010-Preprints-complete.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74 (11), 1-29.10.1037/h0093759Search in Google Scholar

Súarez, M. (2003). Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3) (October 1), 225-244. doi:10.1080/0269859032000169442.10.1080/0269859032000169442Search in Google Scholar

Súarez, M., (Ed.) (2009). Fictions in science: Philosophical essays on modeling and idealization. Vol. 4. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, R. (2009). Theoretical status of computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 124-140.10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1939). Prediction of vicarious trial and error by means of the schematic sowbug. Psychological Review, 46(4), 318-336.10.1037/h0057054Search in Google Scholar

Webb, B. (2009). Animals versus animats: Or why not model the real iguana? Adaptive Behavior, 17(4) (July 28), 269-286.10.1177/1059712309339867Search in Google Scholar

Weber, B. H., & Depew, D. J. (Eds.) (2003). Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zeigler, B. (1976). Theory of modelling and simulation. New York: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar