1. bookVolume 59 (2010): Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Genetic Variation in Cold Hardiness and Phenology Between and Within Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Populations: Implications for Seed Transfer

Published Online: 20 Oct 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 59 (2010) - Issue 1-6 (December 2010)
Page range: 49 - 57
Received: 25 Mar 2008
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Wind-pollinated seeds from 40 trees (half-sib families) were collected from each of six Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) populations in southern Turkey. Two-year old seedlings were evaluated for growth, phenology and cold resistance in a common garden experiment established in Ankara, located outside the species’ natural range. Each family was represented with a six-tree row plot within each of the three replications. The below freezing temperatures (-15.2°C) observed in January and February of 2000 were sufficient to observe visually- assessable-cold damage to the seedlings. The populations significantly differed in all traits under investigation except for second flushing in 1999. Populations originating from more inland and higher elevation areas were more resistant to cold than coastal low elevation populations. Families within populations were significantly different as regards all traits except HT00. Family heritability for bud burst was 0.40, and ranged from 0.12 to 0.37 for height, and from 0.20 to 0.23 for bud set. Final height of cold damage prone seedlings was shorter than cold tolerant seedlings. Families with early bud-set, later bud-burst and shorter second flush shoots suffered less from cold damage. Considering the expected climate change in the eastern Mediterranean, there is a potential for using this species outside its natural range, especially in sites experiencing more continental climate since it will be possible to move the species 200-300 m in altitude and 2-3 degrees in latitude.

Keywords

AITKEN, S. N. and M. HANNERZ (2001): Genecology and gene resource management strategies for conifer cold hardiness, pp. 23-53. In: Conifer cold hardiness, edited by F. S. BIGRAS and S. CULOMBO, Kluwer Academic Press, New York.10.1007/978-94-015-9650-3_2Search in Google Scholar

ALDRETE, A., J. G. MEXAL and K. E. BURR (2008): Seedling cold hardiness, bud set, and bud break in nine provenances of Pinus greggii Engelm. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 3672-3676.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.054Search in Google Scholar

ANONYMOUS (2009): 2008 Yılı Çalıs¸ma Raporu, 2009 Yılı Çalıs¸ma Programı. Orman Ag˘açları ve Tohumları Islah Aras¸tırma Müdürlüg˘ü, Sayı: 3, Ankara, Turkey. [Annual Report 2008, Work Program for 2009. Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Directorate, No: 3, Ankara, Turkey.]Search in Google Scholar

ARBEZ, M. (1974): Distribution, ecology and variation of Pinus brutia in Turkey, pp. 21-33 in Forest Genetic Resources (No: 3), FAO, Rome/Italy.Search in Google Scholar

BINDER, W. D. and P. FIELDER (1996): Chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of frost hardiness in white spruce seedlings from different latitudes. New Forests 11: 233-253.Search in Google Scholar

FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., London, UK.Search in Google Scholar

FISKER, S. E., R. ROSE and D. L. HAASE (1995): Chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of cold hardiness and freezing stress in 1+1 Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Science 41: 564-575.Search in Google Scholar

HAMANN, A. and T. WANG (2006): Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87: 2773-2786.10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2773:PEOCCO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

IŞIK, F. (1986): Altitudinal variation in Pinus brutia Ten.: Seed and seedling characteristics. Silvae Genetica 35: 58-67.Search in Google Scholar

IŞIK, F., S. KESKIN, R. SABUNCU, M. S¸AHIN, M. N. BAS¸ and Z. KAYA (2002): Effects of water stress on the adaptive traits of different Pinus brutia natural populations and families in a nursery trial, Technical Bulletin No: 15, Southwest Anatolia Forest Research Institute, Antalya, Turkey, 42 p.Search in Google Scholar

KANDEMIR, G. E. (2002): Genetics and physiology of cold and drought resistance in Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) populations from southern Turkey. PhD. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

KAYA, Z. and A. TEMERIT (1994): Genetic structure of marginally located Pinus nigra var. pallasiana populations in Central Turkey. Silvae Genetica 43: 272-277.Search in Google Scholar

KAYA, Z. and F. IŞIK (1997): The pattern of genetic variation in shoot growth of Pinus brutia Ten. populations sampled from the Toros Mountains in Turkey. Silvae Genetica 46: 73-81.Search in Google Scholar

KOSKI, V. and J. ANTOLA (1993): National Tree Breeding and Seed Production Program for Turkey 1994-2003, Enso Forest Development Oy. Ltd., Turkish-Finnish Forestry Project.Search in Google Scholar

KULLMAN, L. (2002): Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes. Journal of Ecology 90: 68-77.10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00630.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

LAMBETH, C. C. (1980): Juvenile-mature correlations in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. Forest Science 26: 571-580.Search in Google Scholar

LEDIG, F. T. (1987): Genetic structure and the conservation of California’s endemic and near endemic conifers, pp. 587-594. In: Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants, edited by T. S. ELLIS, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.Search in Google Scholar

LEINONEN, I. and H. HÄNNINEN (2002): Adaptation of timing of bud burst of Norway spruce and boreal climates. Silva Fennica 36: 695-701.10.14214/sf.534Search in Google Scholar

MARACCHI, G., O. SIROTENKO and M. BINDI (2005): Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Climatic Change 70: 117-135.10.1007/s10584-005-5939-7Search in Google Scholar

MÁTYÁS, C. (1996): Climatic adaptation of trees: rediscovering provenance tests. Euphytica 92: 45-54.10.1007/BF00022827Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PARMESAN, C. and G. YOHE (2003): A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.10.1038/nature01286Search in Google Scholar

ROOT, T. L., J. T. PRICE, K. R. HALL, S. H. SCHNEIDER, C. ROSENZWEIG and J. A. POUNDS (2003): Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60.10.1038/nature01333Search in Google Scholar

SAS INSTITUTE INC. (1990): SAS/STAT(c) User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th edition. Cary.Search in Google Scholar

SEARLE, S. R., G. CASELLA and C. E. MCCULLOCH (1992): Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York.10.1002/9780470316856Search in Google Scholar

SOGAARD, G., O. JOHNSON, J. NILSEN and O. JUNTTILA (2008): Climatic control of bud burst in young seedlings of nine provenances of Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 28: 311-320.10.1093/treephys/28.2.31118055441Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SPENCER, D. (2001): Conifers in the Dry Country: A report for the RIRDC/L&W Australia/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products-Australia, RIRDC Publication No: 01/46, Australia, 60 p.Search in Google Scholar

SPITTLEHOUSE, D. L. (2005): Integrating climate change adaptation into forest management. Forestry Chronicle 81: 691-695.10.5558/tfc81691-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

STONECYPHER, R. W. (1992): Computational methods, pp. 195-228. In: Handbook of quantitative forest genetics edited by L. FINS, S. T. FRIEDMAN and J. V. BROTSCHOL, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-015-7987-2_6Search in Google Scholar

SWALLOW, W. H. and J. F. MONAHAN (1984): Monte Carlo comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML estimators of variance components. Technometrics 26: 47-57.10.1080/00401706.1984.10487921Search in Google Scholar

VELİOĞLU, E., F. F. ÇİÇEK, Z. KAYA and B. ÇENGEL (2000): Genetic variation in natural Kazdag˘ı Fir (Abies equitrojani Aschers et. Sint.) populations sampled from Kazdag˘ları, Technical Bulletin No: 3, Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding Research Directorate, Ankara, Turkey, 31 p.Search in Google Scholar

WALTHER, G. R., E. POST, P. CONVEY, A. MENZEL, C. PARMESAN, T. J. C. BEEBEE, J. M. FROMENTIN, O. HOEGH-GULDBERG and F. BAIRLEIN (2002): Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389-395. 10.1038/416389a11919621Search in Google Scholar

WANG, T., A. HAMANN, A. YANCHUK, G. A. O’NEILL and S. N. AITKEN (2006): Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Global Change Biology 12: 2404-2416.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

WHITE, T. (1996): Genetic parameter estimates and breeding value predictions: issues and implications in tree improvement programs, pp. 110-117. In: Tree improvement for sustainable tropical forestry, edited by M. J. DETERS, C. E. HARWOOD and S. U. WALKER, Queensland Forestry Research Institute, Gympie.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo