<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The conclusions drawn from studies of genetic differentiation among populations largely determine our understanding of ecological and population genetic processes. These conclusions basically depend on the applied type of genetic marker and the method of measuring and estimating genetic differentation. However, concerns have been raised about the conceptual appropriateness of common methods of measuring genetic differentiation. The present paper contributes to the clarification of the problems involved by recalling the conceptual characteristics of FST (= GST), by specifying basic tests of the major causal factors of genetic differentiation with the help of permutation analysis, by comparing FST and Hedrick’s new normalization F’ST with the basic index δ of differentiation for data on allozymes and microsatellites obtained from 6 oak stands. All three descriptors display small values, among which δ is largest and closely followed by F’ST, while FST is distinctly smaller than both across all loci. Degrees of covariation of δ with FST and F’ST differ distinctly between allozymes and microsatellites as a probable consequence of confounding aspects of differentiation with aspects of fixation in the FST descriptors. Permutation analysis reveals that the boundary conditions provided by the number of populations and their (sample) sizes as well as the overall genetic variation across population samples determine the order of magnitude of differentiation. This mathematical artefact undermines the widely held opinion that small degrees of differentiation at many loci are the result of extensive gene flow or recent joint history. Differentation patterns vary considerably among allozyme loci (indicating the action of homogenizing and diversifying selection). In contrast, microsatellite loci consistently display significant differentiation as can be explained by mechanisms of non-recurrent mutation. These observations apply to all three descriptors for the relatively high within population polymorphism observed in the studied stands. At least for low within population polymorphism close to fixation, however, it is shown theoretically that the predictions may diverge distinctly among the three descriptors.</abstract>

The conclusions drawn from studies of genetic differentiation among populations largely determine our understanding of ecological and population genetic processes. These conclusions basically depend on the applied type of genetic marker and the method of measuring and estimating genetic differentation. However, concerns have been raised about the conceptual appropriateness of common methods of measuring genetic differentiation. The present paper contributes to the clarification of the problems involved by recalling the conceptual characteristics of FST (= GST), by specifying basic tests of the major causal factors of genetic differentiation with the help of permutation analysis, by comparing FST and Hedrick’s new normalization F’ST with the basic index δ of differentiation for data on allozymes and microsatellites obtained from 6 oak stands. All three descriptors display small values, among which δ is largest and closely followed by F’ST, while FST is distinctly smaller than both across all loci. Degrees of covariation of δ with FST and F’ST differ distinctly between allozymes and microsatellites as a probable consequence of confounding aspects of differentiation with aspects of fixation in the FST descriptors. Permutation analysis reveals that the boundary conditions provided by the number of populations and their (sample) sizes as well as the overall genetic variation across population samples determine the order of magnitude of differentiation. This mathematical artefact undermines the widely held opinion that small degrees of differentiation at many loci are the result of extensive gene flow or recent joint history. Differentation patterns vary considerably among allozyme loci (indicating the action of homogenizing and diversifying selection). In contrast, microsatellite loci consistently display significant differentiation as can be explained by mechanisms of non-recurrent mutation. These observations apply to all three descriptors for the relatively high within population polymorphism observed in the studied stands. At least for low within population polymorphism close to fixation, however, it is shown theoretically that the predictions may diverge distinctly among the three descriptors.

Problems in the Analysis of Genetic Differentiation Among Populations – a Case Study in Quercus robur

Silvae Genetica

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

The conclusions drawn from studies of genetic differentiation among populations largely determine our understanding of ecological and population genetic...

Problems in the Analysis of Genetic Differentiation Among Populations – a Case Study in Quercus robur

Published Online: Oct 14, 2017

Page range: 190 - 199

Received: Dec 08, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2007-0029

Keywords
population differentiation, homogenizing forces, diversifying forces, permutation analysis, analysis of covariation, oak, microsatellites, allozymes

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Problems in the Analysis of Genetic Differentiation Among Populations – a Case Study in Quercus robur

Published Online: Oct 14, 2017

Page range: 190 - 199

Received: Dec 08, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2007-0029

Keywordspopulation differentiation, homogenizing forces, diversifying forces, permutation analysis, analysis of covariation, oak, microsatellites, allozymes

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Keywords
population differentiation, homogenizing forces, diversifying forces, permutation analysis, analysis of covariation, oak, microsatellites, allozymes