1. bookVolume 55 (2006): Issue 1-6 (December 2006)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Stepwise Penalty Index Selection from Populations with a Hierarchical Structure

Published Online: 19 Oct 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 55 (2006) - Issue 1-6 (December 2006)
Page range: 62 - 70
Received: 05 Aug 2005
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

By adding a penalty to a candidate’s breeding value for its relationship with the selected individuals, two indexes were constructed as criteria for stepwise selection of superior individuals from populations with a hierarchical structure. The relationship was expressed in terms of either family contribution or group coancestry. One of the indexes was derived from an optimal selection model. A stepwise procedure that screened superior individuals one by one was introduced to make selection based on these indexes possible. Two penalty selection methods exclusively maximized gain at given coancestry. Both methods produced all identical solutions in most of the populations simulated, and were nearly equivalent in the remaining populations, particularly when heritability was high and the population structure was simple. A better balance between gain and coancestry following penalty index selection can be obtained by avoiding the two extreme solutions: combined- index and within-family selection, and using simple mating designs rather than complex ones.

Keywords

ASKEW, G. R. and P. M. BURROWS (1983): Minimum coancestry selection I. A Pinus taeda population and its simulation. Silvae Genet. 32: 125-131.Search in Google Scholar

BRISBANE, J. R. and J. P. GIBSON (1995a): Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationship in selection decisions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 421-431.10.1007/BF0022296924169831Search in Google Scholar

BRISBANE, J. R. and J. P. GIBSON (1995b): Including genetic relationships in selection decisions: alternative methodologies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 769-775.10.1007/BF0022095724169914Search in Google Scholar

BULMER, M. G. (1971): The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am. Nat. 105: 201-211.Search in Google Scholar

BURROWS, P. P. (1984): Inbreeding under selection from related families. Biometrics 40: 895-906. 10.2307/2531141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CABALLERO, A. (1994): Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657-679.10.1038/hdy.1994.1747814264Search in Google Scholar

FALCONER, D. S. and T. F. C. MACKAY (1996): Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, London, UK.Search in Google Scholar

FERNÁNDEZ, J. and M. A. TORO (1999): The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116: 447-466.Search in Google Scholar

FERNÁNDEZ, J., M. A. TORO and A. CABALLERO (2003): Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics 165: 885-894.10.1093/genetics/165.2.885146277414573495Search in Google Scholar

HENDERSON, C. R. (1984): Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and A. C. MATHESON (1986): An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genet. 35: 173-177.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and R.-P. WEI (1994): Gain versus effective number. p. 164-177. In: Progeny testing and breeding strategies (edited by LEE, S. J.), Proc. of the Nordic Group for Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Edinburgh, Oct. 6-10, 1993, Forestry Authority.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and T. J. MULLIN (1997): Combining high gain and low coancestry. Silvae Genet. 46: 124-129.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D., R.-P. WEI and L. F. BONDESSON (1993): Optimal selection from families. Heredity 70: 619-621.10.1038/hdy.1993.88Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LUSH, J. L. (1947): Family merit and individual merit as bases for selection. Am. Nat. 81: 241-261 and 262-379. 10.1086/281520Search in Google Scholar

OSBORNE, R. (1957): The use of sire and dam family averages in increasing the efficiency of selective breeding under a hierarchical mating system. Heredity 11: 93-116.10.1038/hdy.1957.7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

QUINTON, M., C. SMITH and M. E. GODDARD (1992): Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 1060-1067.10.2527/1992.7041060x1582935Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROBERTSON, A. (1961): Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genet. Res. Camb. 2: 189-194.10.1017/S0016672300000690Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROSVALL, O. and T. J. MULLIN (2003): Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 629-642.10.1007/s00122-003-1318-912851766Search in Google Scholar

SANTIAGO, E. and A. CABALLERO (1995): Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics 139: 1013-1030.10.1093/genetics/139.2.101312063537713405Search in Google Scholar

TORO, M. and M. PEREZ-ENCISO (1990): Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genet. Sel. Evol. 22: 93-107.10.1186/1297-9686-22-1-93Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

VAN BUIJTENEN, J. P. and R. D. BURDON (1990): Expected efficiencies of mating designs for advanced-generation selection. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1648-1663.Search in Google Scholar

VERRIER, E., J. J. COLLEAU and J. L. FOULLEY (1993): Long-term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 446-454.Search in Google Scholar

WANG, T., S. N. AITKEN, J. H. WOODS, K. POLSSON and S. MAGNUSSEN (2004): Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas fir growth and yield in operational plantations: a model-based approach. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1162-1171Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P. (1995): Predicting genetic diversity and optimizing selection in breeding programmes. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, ISBN 91-576-4900-1Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P. and D. LINDGREN (1995): Optimal family contributions and a linear approximation. Theor. Pop. Biol. 48: 318-332.Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P. and F. C. YEH (2000): Optimal family contributions in selection toward maximum gain under restricted average coancestry. Silvae Genet. 49: 281-290.Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P., F. C. YEH and N. K. DHIR (2002): Investigation of status number following selection from populations under different mating designs. Silvae Genet. 51: 87-92.Search in Google Scholar

WEI, R.-P., C. R. HANSEN, N. K. DHIR and F. C. YEH (1998): Genetic gain with desired status number in breeding programs: a study on selection effects. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1861-1869.Search in Google Scholar

WHITE, T. L. and G. R. HODGE (1988): Best linear prediction of breeding values in a forest tree improvement program. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 719-727.10.1007/BF0030351824232350Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WILLIAMS, C. G. and O. SAVOLAINEN (1996): Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for using selfing as a breeding strategy. For. Sci. 42: 102-117.Search in Google Scholar

WRAY, N. R. and M. E. GODDARD (1994): Increasing longterm response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 431-451.10.1186/1297-9686-26-5-431Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZHENG, Y. Q., D. LINDGREN, O. ROSVALL and J. WESTIN (1997): Combining genetic gain and diversity by considering average coancestry in clonal selection of Norway spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1312-1319.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo